Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring Individual Differences in Recognizing Idiomatic Expressions in Context Cover

Exploring Individual Differences in Recognizing Idiomatic Expressions in Context

Open Access
|Aug 2021

References

  1. Abel, B. (2003). English idioms in the first language and second language lexicon: A dual representation approach. Second Language Research, 19(4), 329358. DOI: 10.1191/0267658303sr226oa
  2. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 148. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  3. Beck, S. D., & Weber, A. (2020). Context and Literality in Idiom Processing: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49(5), 837863. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-020-09719-2
  4. Bobrow, S. A., & Bell, S. M. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory & Cognition, 1(3), 343346. DOI: 10.3758/BF03198118
  5. Cacciari, C., Corrardini, P., & Ferlazzo, F. (2018). Cognitive and personality components underlying spoken idiom comprehension in context. An exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00659
  6. Cacciari, C., & Glucksberg, S. (1991). Chapter 9 understanding idiomatic expressions: The contribution of word meanings. Advances in Psychology, 217240. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61535-6
  7. Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 668683. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90014-9
  8. Dąbrowska, E. (2018). Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment. Cognition, 178, 222235. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.018
  9. Fox, J. (2003). Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 8(15), 127. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v008.i15
  10. Gibbs, R. W. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & Cognition, 8(2), 149156. DOI: 10.3758/BF03213418
  11. Gibbs, R. W., & O’Brien, J. E. (1990). Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition, 36(1), 3568. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90053-M
  12. Hintz, F., Dijkhuis, M., van‘t Hoff, V., McQueen, J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (2020). A behavioural dataset for studying individual differences in language skills. Scientific Data, 7(1), 118. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-00758-x
  13. Holsinger, E. (2013). Representing idioms: Syntactic and contextual effects on idiom processing. Language and Speech, 56(3), 373394. DOI: 10.1177/0023830913484899
  14. Hubers, F., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Dijkstra, T. (2019). Normative data of Dutch idiomatic expressions: Subjective judgments you can bank on. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01075
  15. Hubers, F., van Ginkel, W., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Dijkstra, T. (2018). Normative data on Dutch idiomatic expressions: Native speakers. DANS [Dataset]. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01075
  16. Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643650. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
  17. Kidd, E., Donnelly, S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Individual differences in language acquisition and processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(2), 154169. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.006
  18. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 126. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  19. Lüdecke, D., Makowski, D., Waggoner, P., & Patil, I. (2020). Assessment of Regression Models Performance. CRAN. Available from https://easystats.github.io/performance
  20. Marsden, E. J., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (2018). A Methodological Synthesis of Self-Paced Reading in Second Language Research: Methodological synthesis of SPR tests. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(5), 861904. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716418000036
  21. McGlone, M. S., Glucksberg, S., & Cacciari, C. (1994). Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17(2), 167190. DOI: 10.1080/01638539409544865
  22. Mitchell, D. C. (1994). An evaluation of subject-paced reading tasks and other methods for investigating immediate processes in reading. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 6990). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. DOI: 10.4324/9780429505379-4
  23. Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., … & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195203. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
  24. Prasad, G., & Linzen, T. (2018). Do self-paced reading studies provide evidence for rapid syntactic adaptation? PsyArXiv. https://osf.io/qd8ye/
  25. R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
  26. Rommers, J., Dijkstra, T., & Bastiaansen, M. (2013). Context-dependent semantic processing in the human brain: Evidence from idiom comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(5), 762776. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00337
  27. Stamenković, D., Ichien, N., & Holyoak, K. J. (2019). Metaphor comprehension: An individual-differences approach. Journal of Memory and Language, 105, 108118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2018.12.003
  28. Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(5), 523534. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6
  29. Tabossi, P., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K. (2009). Why are idioms recognized fast? Memory & Cognition, 37(4), 529540. DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.4.529
  30. Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1999). On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 16551674. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00008-9
  31. Van Ginkel, W. (2019). ‘It’s all smooth sailing’: Figurative and literal aspects of language comprehension (PhD Dissertation). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Donders Series.
  32. Van Wonderen, E., Hubers, F., & Dijkstra, T. (in prep.). Single Words in Idiom Processing: Activation of Word Forms and Literal Word Meanings.
  33. Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
  34. Wray, A., & Perkins, M. R. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language & Communication, 20(1), 128. DOI: 10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.183 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 10, 2021
Accepted on: Jul 22, 2021
Published on: Aug 12, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Mesian Tilmatine, Ferdy Hubers, Florian Hintz, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.