Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching
References
- Altmann, E. M. (2006). Task switching is not cue switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1016–1022. DOI: 10.3758/BF03213918
- Altmann, E. M. (2011). Testing probability matching and episodic retrieval accounts of response repetition effects in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 935–951. DOI: 10.1037/a0022931
- Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
- Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2004). Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Memory and Cognition, 32(6), 965–978. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196874
- Arrington, C. M., Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2007). Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: Are there “true” task switch effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 484–502. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.484
- Benini, E., Koch, I., Mayr, S., Frings, C., & Philipp, A. M. (2022). Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching. Manuscript Submitted for Publication.
- Declerck, M., & Philipp, A. M. (2015). A review of control processes and their locus in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22(6), 1630–1645. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0836-1
- Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2008). That’s what task sets are for: Shielding against irrelevant information. Psychological Research, 72(4), 355–361. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-007-0131-5
- Dreisbach, G., & Wenke, D. (2011). The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1540–1546. DOI: 10.1037/a0024077
- Druey, M. D. (2014). Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: An evaluation of four explanations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 125–146. DOI: 10.1037/a0033868
- Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
- Forrest, C. L. D., Monsell, S., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2014). Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 40(4), 1002–1024. DOI: 10.1037/a0035981
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. M. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 1367–1377. DOI: 10.1080/17470210600955645
- Gade, M., Schuch, S., Druey, M. D., & Koch, I. (2014).
Inhibitory control in task switching . In Task switching and cognitive control. (pp. 137–159). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199921959.003.0007 - Gade, M., & Steinhauser, M. (2020). The impact of cue format and cue transparency on task switching performance. Psychological Research, 84(5), 1346–1369. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01150-0
- Grzyb, K. R., & Hübner, R. (2013). Excessive response-repetition costs under task switching: How response inhibition amplifies response conflict. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(1), 126–139. DOI: 10.1037/a0028477
- Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. J. (2014). Stimulus–response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 376–384. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004
- Hommel, B. (1998). Event Files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183–216. DOI: 10.1080/713756773
- Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- Hommel, B. (2019). Theory of Event Coding (TEC) V2.0: Representing and controlling perception and action. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(7), 2139–2154. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01779-4
- Hübner, R., & Druey, M. D. (2006). Response execution, selection, or activation: What is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting? Psychological Research, 70(4), 245–261. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8
- Kandalowski, S. R. M., Seibold, J. C., Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2020). Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(4), 1632–1643. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01931-0
- Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
- Kleinsorge, T. (1999). Response repetition benefits and costs. Acta Psychologica, 103(3), 295–310. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00047-5
- Kleinsorge, T., & Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research, 62(4), 300–312. DOI: 10.1007/s004260050060
- Koch, I., Frings, C., & Schuch, S. (2018). Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition. Psychological Research, 82(3), 570–579. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0847-9
- Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 557–583. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000144
- Koch, I., Schuch, S., Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2011). Response-repetition effects in task switching—Dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability. Acta Psychologica, 136(3), 399–404. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.006
- Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
- Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(3), 575–599. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575
- Lukas, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010a). The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching. Acta Psychologica, 134(3), 318–322. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.004
- Lukas, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010b). Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance. Psychological Research, 74(3), 255–267. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0246-y
- Lukas, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2014). Crossmodal attention switching: Auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks. Acta Psychologica, 153, 139–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.10.003
- Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2006). Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 932–943. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.932
- Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 29(3), 362–372. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.362
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2017). Dissociation of binding and learning processes. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 79(8), 2590–2605. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1393-7
- Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
- Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 493–516. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493
- Morton, J. (1979).
Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the Logogen Model . In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of Visible Language (pp. 259–268). US: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-0994-9_15 - Morton, J. (1980).
The logogen model and orthographic structure . In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Spelling (pp. 117–132). Academic Press. - Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207–231. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.124.2.207
- Rubin, O., & Koch, I. (2006). Exogenous influences on task set activation in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(6), 1033–1046. DOI: 10.1080/02724980543000105
- Schmidt, J. R., Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (2020). Contingency learning as binding? Testing an exemplar view of the colour-word contingency learning effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(5), 739–761. DOI: 10.1177/1747021820906397
- Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 343–367. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343
- Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2011). Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue–task mappings: Not so different after all. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 405–415. DOI: 10.1037/a0021967
- Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2004). The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(3), 566–582. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.566
- Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2010). Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution. Acta Psychologica, 135(3), 302–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.016
- Spence, C., & Driver, J. (1997). On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(3), 389–403. DOI: 10.3758/BF03211906
- Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601–626. DOI: 10.1037/a0019791
- von Bastian, C. C., & Druey, M. D. (2017). Shifting between mental sets: An individual differences approach to commonalities and differences of task switching components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(9), 1266–1285. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000333
- Whitehead, P. S., Pfeuffer, C. U., & Egner, T. (2020). Memories of control: One-shot episodic learning of item-specific stimulus-control associations. Cognition, 199(104220). DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104220
- Woods, K. J. P., Siegel, M. H., Traer, J., & McDermott, J. H. (2017). Headphone screening to facilitate web-based auditory experiments. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(7), 2064–2072. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1361-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.220 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 26, 2021
Accepted on: Apr 4, 2022
Published on: Apr 18, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
© 2022 Elena Benini, Iring Koch, Susanne Mayr, Christian Frings, Andrea M. Philipp, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.