Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How does Working Memory Promote Traces in Episodic Memory? Cover

How does Working Memory Promote Traces in Episodic Memory?

Open Access
|Jan 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Overall summary of the current experiments.

METHODOLOGICAL DETAILSEXPERIMENT
123456
ParticipantsMean age (SD)21.29 (1.85)20.33 (1.66)21.79 (2.25)21.63 (2.08)24.42 (4.64)21.13 (1.75)
Experiment languageItalianItalianItalianEnglishEnglishItalian
DesignOverall design2 (CL) × 2 (# Dist)2 (CL) × 2 (# Dist)2 (CL) × 2 (# Dist)2 (CL) × 2 (# Dist)2 (CL) × 2 (FT)One-way:
High CL/Low FT
Low CL/High FT
High CL/High FT
CL (low vs. high)Location vs. ParitySlow vs. Fast PaceSRT vs. ParitySRT vs. ParitySlow vs. Fast paceSlow vs. Fast pace
# Dist (low vs. high)3 vs. 63 vs. 63 vs. 61 vs. 3
FT (low vs. high)Short vs. LongShort vs. Long
Method# Dist after each word3 or 63 or 63 or 61 or 32, 4, or 83 or 6
Pace of each distractor700 ms1125 or 600 ms700 ms700 ms750 ms600 ms
FT after each distractor300 ms375 or 200 ms300 ms300 ms500 or 250 ms400 or 200 ms
Total FT/studied word900 or 1800 msfrom 600 to 2250 ms900 or 1800 ms300 or 900 ms2000 or 1000 ms1200 or 600 ms
Immediate recall methodTypedTypedTypedAloudAloudTyped

[i] Note: All design factors manipulated within-subjects, and blocked and counterbalanced across participants. CL = cognitive load, # Dist = number of distractors, FT = free time, SRT = serial reaction time.

Table 2

Mean (and standard deviations) of distractor response times (RTs, in ms) and immediate recall (proportion correct) as a function of cognitive load (CL) and the second manipulated factor (either distractors or free time) in each experiment.

EXP.SECOND FACTORRESPONSE TIMES (RTS, MS)IMMEDIATE RECALL – SERIAL SCORING
LOW CLHIGH CLLOW CLHIGH CL
1DistractorsLow403.56 (56.87)549.62 (36.20)0.73 (0.14)0.65 (0.18)
High378.02 (42.75)547.93 (26.39)0.72 (0.21)0.61 (0.15)
2DistractorsLow605.21 (83.19)514.43 (28.04)0.79 (0.15)0.68 (0.18)
High606.76 (74.98)521.82 (34.13)0.78 (0.16)0.62 (0.19)
3DistractorsLow285.21 (53.03)542.99 (42.83)0.86 (0.12)0.70 (0.15)
High298.26 (56.26)540.41 (42.03)0.90 (0.12)0.63 (0.18)
4DistractorsLow576.51 (108.28)709.07 (72.06)0.48 (0.24)0.38 (0.24)
High587.25 (130.59)686.73 (63.25)0.50 (0.24)0.33 (0.23)
5Free timeLow737.75 (78.22)717.88 (64.77)0.44 (0.22)0.45 (0.18)
High736.01 (77.28)707.86 (60.36)0.47 (0.23)0.46 (0.26)
6Free timeLow492.32 (22.20)0.69 (0.14)
High499.53 (38.66)497.38 (24.00)0.68 (0.17)0.62 (0.19)

[i] Note: Exp. = experiment, CL = cognitive load.

Table 3

Results of the BANOVAs for each experiment.

EXP.DESIGNMEASUREMAIN EFFECT OF FACTOR 1MAIN EFFECT OF FACTOR 2BOTH MAIN EFFECTSMAIN EFFECTS + INTERACTION
12 (CL: location, parity) × 2 (Distractors: 3, 6)Distractor RTs1.52 × 10360.272.65 × 10363.53 × 1036
Immediate serial recall134.320.3553.7219.42
Delayed recall overall0.320.870.300.14
Delayed recall conditionalized0.231.150.270.09
22 (CL: slow, fast pace) × 2 (Distractors: 3, 6)Distractor RTs1.00 ×10130.222.50 × 10127.55 × 1011
Immediate serial recall2860.070.401453.28603.75
Delayed recall overall47.940.2210.813.14
Delayed recall conditionalized1.640.220.380.11
32 (CL: SRT, parity) × 2 (Distractors: 3, 6)Distractor RTs6.29 ×10470.221.75 × 10478.12 × 1046
Immediate recall2.36 × 10100.236.21 × 1091.83 × 1010
Delayed recall overall120.080.2938.0211.24
Delayed recall conditionalized1.940.430.900.36
42 (CL: SRT, parity) × 2 (Distractors: 1, 3)Distractor RTs3.44 ×1080.217.61 × 1074.72 × 107
Immediate serial recall416.070.23102.4950.59
Delayed recall overall2.980.581.940.69
Delayed recall conditionalized0.308.832.870.83
52 (CL: slow, fast pace) × 2 (FT: short, long)Distractor RTs25.560.287.732.61
Immediate serial recall0.220.240.060.02
Delayed recall overall0.430.430.190.06
Delayed recall conditionalized1.980.501.080.32
6One-way (High CL/Low FT, Low CL/High FT, High CL/High FT)Distractor RTs0.16
Immediate serial recall0.67
Delayed recall overall0.21
Delayed recall conditionalized0.22

[i] Note: All models include participant as a random effect. The Bayes factor (BF) refers to the evidence for the alternative model (BF10) for each effect (shown in the different columns) relative to the null model (i.e., a model that includes only a random effect of participant). The best model in favor of the effect is shown in boldface in each row for each experiment/measure and is underlined when the BF for the best model relative to the next-best model exceeds 3. BANOVA = Bayesian analysis of variance, Exp. = experiment, CL = cognitive load, FT = free time, RTs = response times.

Figure 1

Mean overall and conditionalized delayed recall (and 95% within-subjects confidence intervals) as a function of cognitive load and number of distractors in Experiments 1–4.

Figure 2

Delayed recall (both overall and conditionalized) as a function of accumulated free time at each serial position (labeled 1–4) and each combination of cognitive load (CL) and number of distractors conditions in Experiments 1–4. See online article for a color version of this figure.

Figure 3

Mean overall and conditionalized delayed recall (and 95% within-subjects confidence intervals) as a function of cognitive load and free time in Experiments 5–6.

Figure 4

Delayed recall (both overall and conditionalized) as a function of accumulated free time at each serial position (labeled 1–4) and each combination of cognitive load (CL) and free time conditions in Experiments 5–6. See online article for a color version of this figure.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.245 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 4, 2022
Accepted on: Oct 13, 2022
Published on: Jan 11, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Vanessa M. Loaiza, Anne-Laure Oftinger, Valérie Camos, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.