References
- Anderson, J. R., et al. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review. 111(4), 1036–1060. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036
- Anselmi, F., Murray, M., & Franceschiello, B. (2020). A computational model for grid maps in neural populations. J Comput Neurosci, 48, 149–159. DOI: 10.1007/s10827-020-00742-9
- Antonov, I., Antonova, I., Kandel, E. R., & Hawkins, R. D. (2003). Activity-Dependent Presynaptic Facilitation & Hebbian ltp Are Both Required & Interact during Classical Conditioning in Aplysia. Neuron, 37(1). DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01129-7
- Ashby, F., & Helie, S. (2011). A tutorial on computational cognitive neuroscience, Modeling the neurodynamics of cognition. J. Math. Psychol, 55, 273–289. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2011.04.003
- Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 3½- and 4½-month-old infants. Develop. Psychol., 23(5), 655–664. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.655
- Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 20(1985), 191–208. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90008-3
- Baxter, D., & Byrne, J. (2006). Aplysia Feeding behavior: a model system for comparing cellular mechanisms of classical and operant conditioning. Learn. Mem, 13, 669–680. DOI: 10.1101/lm.339206
- Bechtel, W. (2016). Investigating neural representations: the tale of place cells. Synthese, 193, 1287–1321. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-014-0480-8
- Bicanski, A., & Burgess, N. (2019). A Computational Model of Visual Recognition Memory via Grid Cells. Current Biology, 29, 979–990. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.077
- Bliss, T., & Lomo, T. (1973). Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J. Physiol., 232(1973), 331–356. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010273
- Bolton, S., & Hattie, J. (2017). Cognitive and Brain Development: Executive Functions, Piaget, and the Prefrontal Cortex. Arch. Psychol, 1, 3.
- Bonzon, P. (2017). Towards neuro-inspired symbolic models of cognition: linking neural dynamics to behaviors through asynchronous communications. Cogn Neurodyn, 11(4), 327–353. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-017-9435-3
- Bonzon, P. (2019). Symbolic modeling of asychronous neural dynamics reveal potential synchronous roots of awareness. Front. Comput. Neurosci. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00001
- Bonzon, P. (2020). Modeling the synchronization of multimodal perceptions as a basis for the emergence of deterministic behaviors. Front. Neurorobot. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.570358
- Bonzon, P., Cavalcanti, M., & Nossum, R. (eds.) (2000). Formal Aspects of Context, Applied Logic Series 20, Kluver Academic Publ. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9397-7
- Borst, J. P., & Anderson, J. R. (2017). A step-by-step tutorial on using the cognitive architecture ACT-R in combination with fMRI data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 76(Part B), 94–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.05.005
- Bower, T. (1967). The development of object-permanence: Some studies of existence constancy. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 411–418. DOI: 10.3758/BF03208778
- Bower, T., & Wishart, J. (1972). The effects of motor skill on object permanence. Cognition, 1(2–3), 165–172. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(72)90017-0
- Brette, R., et al. (2007). Simulation of networks of spiking neurons, A review of tools & strategies. J. Computional Neuroscience, 23, 349–398. DOI: 10.1007/s10827-007-0038-6
- Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159. DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-M
- Carandini, M. (2012). From circuits to behavior: a bridge too far? Nature neurosci., 15(4), 505–507. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3043
- Carew, T. J. (2002). Neurology, Understanding the consequences. Nature New & Views, 407, 803–806. DOI: 10.1038/417803a
- Cooper, R., & Peebles, D. (2015). Beyond Single-Level Accounts: The Role of Cognitive Architectures in Cognitive Scientific Explanation. Topics in Cogn. Sci., 7(2), 243–258. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12132
- Darwin,
C. (1871).
The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex . John Murray. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.24784 - Diamond, A. (2001). Looking closely at infants’ performance and experimental procedures in the A-not-B task. Behav Brain Sci, 24(1), 39–42. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01253916
- Doumas, L., Hummel, J., & Sandhofer, C. (2008). A Theory of the Discovery and Predication of Relational Concepts. Psychological Review, 115, 1–43. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.1
- Egan, F. (2014). How to think about mental content. Philos Stud, 170, 115–135. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-013-0172-0
- Egan,
F. (2020).
A deflationary account of mental representations . In J. Smortchkova, et al. (Eds.), What are Mental Representations ? Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190686673.003.0002 - Forstmann,
B., &
Wagenmakers,
E. (2015).
Model-based cognitive neuroscience, a conceptual introduction . In B. Forstmann, & E.-J. Wagenmakers, (Eds), An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience, Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9 - Frank,
M. J. (2015).
Linking across levels of computation in model-based cognitive neuroscience . In B. Forstmann, & E.-J. Wagenmakers, (Eds), An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience, Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9_8 - Frank, M. J., & Badre, D. (2015). How cognitive theory guides neuroscience. Cognition, 135, 14–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.009
- Frégnac, Y. (2017). Big data and the industrialization of neuroscience: A safe roadmap for understanding the brain? Science, 358(6362), 470–477. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan8866
- Frégnac, Y., & Bathellier, B. (2015). Cortical Correlates of Low-Level Perception: From Neural Circuits to Percepts. Neuron, 88. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.041
- Gallistel,
C. (2001).
Mental Representations, Psychology of . In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01488-1 - Gallistel,
C. (2017).
Learning and Representation . In: Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd ed. Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21009-2 - Gallistel, C. (2021). The physical basis of memory, Cognition, 213. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104533
- Gershman, S. (2017) Context-dependent learning and causal structure. Psychon Bull Rev, 24, 557–565. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1110-x
- Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. (2002). Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815706
- Glanzman, D. L. (1995). The cellular basis of classical conditioning in Aplysia californica – it’s less simple than you think. Trends in Neurosciences, 18, 30–36. DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93947-V
- Goldman, J., et al. (2019). Bridging Single Neuron Dynamics to Global Brain States. Front. Syst. Neurosci. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00075
- Haugeland,
J. (1991).
‘Representational Genera’ . In W. Ramsey, S. Stich & D. Rumelhart (Eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, 61–90. Erlbaum, New Jersey. - Herd, S., Krueger, K., Kriete, T., Huang, T. R., Hazy, T., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2013). Strategic Cognitive Sequencing: A Computational Cognitive Neuroscience Approach. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol 2013. DOI: 10.1155/2013/149329
- Heyes, C. (2012) Simple minds: a qualified defence of associative learning. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 367, 2695–2703. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0217
- Hinton, G. E., et al. (2006). A fast learning algorithm for deep beliefs net. Neural Computation, 18(7), 1527–1554. DOI: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527
- Hodgkin, A. L., & Huxley, A. F. (1952). A quantitative description of membrane current & its application to conduction & excitation in nerve. Journal of Physiology, 17(4), 500–544. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764
- Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 79(8), 2554–2558. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554
- Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2005). Relational Reasoning in a Neurally Plausible Cognitive Architecture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 153–157. DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00350.x
- Hutto,
D., &
Myin,
E. (2020).
Deflating Deflationism about Mental Representations . In: J. Smortchkova, et al. (Eds.), What are Mental Representations? Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190686673.003.0004 - Huyck, C., & Passmore, P. (2013). A review of cell assemblies. Biol Cybern, 107(3), 263–288. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-013-0555-5
- Jilk, D., Lebiere, C., O’Reilly, R., & Anderson, J. R. (2008). SAL: An explicitly pluralistic cognitive architecture. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 20(3), 197–218. DOI: 10.1080/09528130802319128
- Kandel, E., & Tauc, L. (1965). Heterosynaptic facilitation in neurones of the abdominal ganglion of Aplysia depilans. Journal of Physiology (London), 181. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007742
- Kohonen, T. (1982). Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, 43, 59–69. DOI: 10.1007/BF00337288
- Kriegeskorte, N., & Douglas, P. (2018). Cognitive computational neuroscience. Nature Neurosci., 21, 1148–1160. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0210-5
- Letzkus, J., Wolff, S., & Lüthi, A. (2015). Disinhibition, a Circuit Mechanism for Associative Learning & Memory. Neuron, 88(2), 264–276. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.024
- Lewis, M., Purdy, S., Ahmad, S., & Hawkins, J. (2019). Locations in the Neocortex: A Theory of Sensorimotor Object Recognition Using Cortical Grid Cells. Front. Neural Circuits, 13, 22. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2019.00022
- Liu, X., et al. (2012). Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall. Nature, 484(7394), 381–5. DOI: 10.1038/nature11028
- Love, B. (2015). The algorithmic Level is the Bridge between Computation and Brain. Topics in Cogn. Scie, 7(2), 230–242. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12131
- Ma, W., & Pouget, A. (2008). Linking Neurons to Behavior in Multisensory Perception: A Computational Review. Brain Research, 1242, 4–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.082
- Markram, H., Lubke, J., Frotscher, M., & Sakmann, B. (1997). Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs & EPSPs. Science, 275, 213–215. DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5297.213
- Markram, H, et al. (2015). Reconstruction & Simulation of Neocortical Microcircuitry. Cell, 163, 456–492. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.029
- Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Approach. Freeman & Co.
- Marr,
D., &
Poggio,
T. (1977).
“From Understanding Computation to Understanding Neural Circuitry” In E. Poppel, R. Heldand J. E. Dowling (Eds.), Neuronal Mechanisms in Visual Perception, Neurosciences Res. Prog. Bull., 15, 470–488. - McCulloch, W., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 7, 115–133. DOI: 10.1007/BF02478259
- McCune, L. (2001). Is a field theory of perseverative reaching compatible with a Piagetian view? Behav Brain Sci, 24(1), 53. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01383917
- Moser, E. I., Kropff, E., & Moser, M.-B. (2008). Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system. Annual. Review Neuroscience, 31. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.061307.090723
- Moser, E. I., & Moser, M.-B. (2008). A metric for space. Hippocampus, 18, 1142–1156. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20483
- Mulder, M. J., van Maanen, L., & Forstmann, B. J. (2014). Perceptual decision neurosciences – A model-based review. Neuroscience, 277, 872–884. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.031
- Müller, U., & Carpendale, J. (2001). Objectivity, intentionality, and levels of explanation. Behav Brain Sci, 24(1), 56–57. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01413914
- Munakata, Y. (1998). Infant perseverative and implications for object permanence theories: A DP model of the A-not-B task. Develop. Sci, 1, 161–84. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7687.00021
- Newell,
A.,
Rosenbloom,
P., &
Laird,
J. (1989).
Symbolic Architectures for Cognition . In M. Posner (ed), Foundations of cognitive sciences. MIT Press. DOI: 10.21236/ADA222909 - Newen,
A., &
Vosgerau,
G. (2020).
Situated Mental Representations . In J. Smortchkova, et al. (Eds.), What are Mental Representations? Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190686673.003.0007 - O’Keefe, J., & Dostrovsky, J. (1971). The hippocampus as a spatial map: Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Research, 34(1), 171–5. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90358-1
- O’Reilly, R., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/2014.001.0001
- Orlandi,
N. (2020).
Representing as Coordinating with Absence . In J. Smortchkova, et al. (Eds.) What are Mental Representations? Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190686673.003.0005 - Palmieri, T, et al. (2017). Model-based cognitive neuroscience. J. Math. Psychol. 76(B), 59–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.10.010
- Piaget,
J. (1936).
La naissance de l’intelligence chez l’enfant. Delachaux et Niestlé [english translation: Piaget, J (1952) . The origins of intelligence in children, New York International Universities Press]. - Piaget,
J. (1937).
La construction du réél chez l’enfant. Delachaux et Niestlé [english translation: Piaget, J (1954) . The construction of reality in the child, Basic Books]. - Poggio, T. (2012), The level of understandings framework, revised. Perception, 41(9), 1007–23. DOI: 10.1068/p7299
- Queenan, J., et al. (2017). On the research of time past: the hunt for the substrate of memory. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1396, 108–125. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13348
- Ramsay, D., & Campos, J. (1978) The onset of representation and entry into stage 6 of object permanence development. Developmental Psychology, 52, 785–97. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.14.1.79
- Ramsey, W. (2016). Untangling two questions about mental representation. New Ideas in Psychol., 40, 3–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.01.004
- Ramsey,
W. (2020).
Defending representation realism . In J. Smortchkova, et al. (Eds.) What are Mental Representations? Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190686673.003.0003 - Ruffman, T. (2001). Understanding A-not-B errors as a function of object representation and deficits in attention rather than motor memories. Behav Brain Sci, 24(1), 61. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01473912
- Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001
- Ryan, T. J., Roy, D. S., & Pignatelli, M., et al. (2015). Engram cells retain memory under retrograde amnesia. Science, 348, 1007–1013. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa5542
- Schöner, E., & Thelen, G. (2006). Using Dynamic Field Theory to Rethink Infant Habituation. Psych. Review, 113(2), 273–299. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.273
- Seth, A., McKinstry, J., Edelman, G., & Krichmar, J. (2004). Visual binding through reentrant connectivity and dynamic synchronization in a brain-based device. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 1185–1199. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh079
- Shastri, L., & Ajjanagadde, V. (1993). From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony. Behav. Brain Sci, 16(3), 417–494. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00030910
- Smortchkova, J, et al., eds. (2020). What are Mental Representations? Oxford Univ. Press
- Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: a field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behav Brain Sci, 24(1), 1–34. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01003910
- Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamics systems approach to the development of perception and action. MIT Press
- Tomov, M., et al. (2018). Neural Computations Underlying Causal Structure Learning. J. Neurosci., 38(32), 7143–57. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3336-17.2018
- Tonegawa, S., et al. (2015). Memory engram storage and retrieval. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 35, 109–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.07.009
- Turner,
B. (2015).
Constraining cognitive abstractions through Bayesian modeling . In B. U. Forstmann, & E.-J. Wagenmakers (Eds.), An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience, 199–220 Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9_10 - Turner, B. M., et al. (2017). Approaches to analysis in model-based cognitive neuroscience. J. of Math. Psychol. Feb, 76(B), 65–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.001
- Van der Velde, F., & de Kamps, M. (2015). The necessity of connection structures in neural models of variable binding. Cogn Neurodyn, 9, 359–37. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-015-9331-7
- Van Gelder, T. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behav. Brain. Sci, 21, 1–14. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X98001733
- Vosgerau, G. (2006). The Perceptual Nature of Mental Models. Advances in Psychology, 138, 255–275. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4115(06)80039-7
- Vosgerau, G. (2010). Memory and Content. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 838–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.021
- Wyble, B., et al. (2020). Understanding Visual Attention With RAGNAROC: A Reflexive Attention Gradient Through Neural AttRactOr Competition. Psych. Review., 126(6), 1163–1198. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000245
- Zagha, E., Ge, X., & McCormick, D. (2015). Competing Neural Ensembles in Motor Cortex Gate Goal-Directed Motor Output. Neuron, 88(3), 565–577. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.044
- Zeki, S. (2015). A massively asynchronous, parallel brain. Phil. Tran. R. Soc. B, 370, 20140174. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0174
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.249 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: May 22, 2022
Accepted on: Nov 14, 2022
Published on: Jan 12, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2023 Pierre Bonzon, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.