Proactively Adjusting Stopping: Response Inhibition is Faster when Stopping Occurs Frequently
References
- Aron, A. R. (2011). From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biological Psychiatry, 69(12), 55–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024
- Balduzzi, S., Rücker, G., & Schwarzer, G. (2019). How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 22(4), 153–160. DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117
- Band, G. P. H., Van der Molen, M. W., & Logan, G. D. (2003). Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychologica, 112(2), 105–142. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00079-3
- Bissett, P. G., Jones, H. M., Poldrack, R. A., & Logan, G. D. (2021). Severe violations of independence in response inhibition tasks. Science Advances, 7(12), 1–14. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf4355
- Bissett, P. G., & Logan, G. D. (2011). Balancing Cognitive Demands: Control Adjustments in the Stop-Signal Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 392–404. DOI: 10.1037/a0021800
- Chikazoe, J., Jimura, K., Hirose, S., Yamashita, K., Miyashita, Y., & Konishi, S. (2009). Preparation to Inhibit a Response Complements Response Inhibition during Performance of a Stop-Signal Task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(50), 15870–77. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3645-09.2009
- De Leeuw, J. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
- Doekemeijer, R. A., Verbruggen, F., & Boehler, C. N. (2021). Face the (trigger) failure: Trigger failures strongly drive the effect of reward on response inhibition. Cortex, 139, 166–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.025
- Elchlepp, H., Lavric, A., Chambers, C. D., & Verbruggen, F. (2016). Proactive inhibitory control: A general biasing account. Cognitive Psychology, 86, 27–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.01.004
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
- Goulet-Pelletier, J.-C., & Cousineau, D. (2018). A review of effect sizes and their confidence intervals, Part 1: The Cohen’s d family. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 14(4), 242–265. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.14.4.p242
- Hawkins, H. L., & Shulman, G. L. (1979). Two definitions of persistence in visual perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 348–350. DOI: 10.3758/BF03198815
- Jahfari, S., Stinear, C. M., Claffey, M., Verbruggen, F., & Aron, A. R. (2010). Responding with Restraint: What Are the Neurocognitive Mechanisms? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1479–1492. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21307
- Jahfari, S., Verbruggen, F., Frank, M. J., Waldorp, L. J., Colzato, L., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Forstmann, B. U. (2012). How Preparation Changes the Need for Top–Down Control of the Basal Ganglia When Inhibiting Premature Actions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(32), 10870–10878. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0902-12.2012
- Kassambara, A. (2021). rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. R package version 0.7.0.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix - Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 26(4), 1–12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
- Leunissen, I., Coxon, J. P., & Swinnen, S. P. (2016). A Proactive Task Set Influences How Response Inhibition Is Implemented in the Basal Ganglia. Human Brain Mapping, 37(12), 4706–4717. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23338
- Logan, G. D. (1981).
Attention, automaticity, and the ability to stop a speeded choice response . In: J. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. - Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and Independence in Responding to Double Stimulation: A Comparison of Stop, Change, and Dual-Task Paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception, and Performance, 12(4), 549–563. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.12.4.549
- Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91(3), 295–327. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295
- Matzke, D., Love, J., & Heathcote, A. (2017). A Bayesian approach for estimating the probability of trigger failures in the stop-signal paradigm. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 267–81. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0695-8
- Messel, M. S., Raud, L., Hoff, P. K., Skaftnes, C. S., & Huster, R. J. (2019). Strategy switches in proactive inhibitory control and their association with task-general and stopping-specific networks. Neuropsychologia, 135(107220), 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107220
- Messel, M. S., Raud, L., Hoff, P. K., Stubberud, J., & Huster, R. J. (2021). Frontal-midline theta reflects different mechanisms associated with proactive and reactive control of inhibition. NeuroImage. 241(118400), 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118400
- R Core Team. (2014).
R: A language and environment for statistical computing . Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URLhttp://www.R-project.org/ - Ramautar, J. R., Kok, A., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2004). Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: The N2/P3 complex further validated. Brain and Cognition, 56(2), 234–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.091
- Ramautar, J. R., Slagter, H. A., Kok, A., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2006). Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: The insula and the significance of failed inhibition. Brain Research, 1105(1), 143–154. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01797-6
- Sánchez-Carmona, A. J., Rincón-Pérez, I., López-Martín, S., Albert, J., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2021). The effects of discrimination on the adoption of different strategies in selective stopping. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 209–218. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01797-6
- Strayer, D. L., & Kramer, A. F. (1994). Strategies and automaticity: II. Dynamic aspects of strategy adjustment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(2), 342–365. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.2.342
- Verbruggen, F., Aron, A. R., Band, G. P. H., Beste, C., Bissett, P. G., Brockett, A. T., Brown, J. W., Chamberlain, S. R., Chambers, C. D., Colonius, H., Colzato, L. S., Cornell, B. D., Coxon, J. P., Depuis, A., Eagle, D. M., Garavan, H., Greenhouse, I., Heathcote, A., Huster, R. J., Jahfari, S., Kenemans, J. L., Leunissen, I., Li, C.-S. R., Logan, G. D., Matzke, D., Morein-Zamir, S., Murthy, A., Paré, M., Poldrack, R. A., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Robbins, T. W., Roesch, M., Rubia, K., Schachar, R. J., Schall, J. D., Stock, A.-K., Swann, N. C., Thakkar, K. N., Van der Molen, M. W., Vermeylen, L., Vink, M., Wessel, J. R., Whelan, R., Zandbelt, B. B., & Boehler, C. N. (2019). A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task. eLife, 8, 1–26. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.46323
- Verbruggen, F., Chambers, C. D., & Logan, G. D. (2013). Fictitious Inhibitory Differences: How Skewness and Slowing Distort the Estimation of Stopping Latencies. Psychological Science, 24(3), 352–362. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612457390
- Verbruggen, F., McLaren, I. P. L., & Chambers, C. D. (2014). Banishing the Control Homunculi in Studies of Action Control and Behavior Change. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 497–524. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614526414
- Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009a). Proactive Adjustments of Response Strategies in the Stop-Signal Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception, and Performance, 35(3), 835–854. DOI: 10.1037/a0012726
- Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009b). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(5), 647–661. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014
- Vink, M., Kaldewaij, R., Zandbelt, B. B., Pas, P., & Du Plessis, S. (2015). The role of stop-signal probability and expectation in proactive inhibition. European Journal of Neuroscience, 41, 1086–1094. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12879
- Wang, X.-J. (2013).
The prefrontal cortex as a quintessential “cognitive-type” neural circuit . In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (2nd ed., pp. 226–248). New York City, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199837755.003.0018 - Weigard, A., Heathcote, A., Matzke, D., & Huang-Pollock, C. (2019). Cognitive Modeling Suggests That Attentional Failures Drive Longer Stop-Signal Reaction Time Estimates in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(4), 856–872. DOI: 10.1177/2167702619838466
- Wessel, J. R. (2018). Surprise: A More Realistic Framework for Studying Action Stopping? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(9), 741–744. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.06.005
- Wessel, J. R., & Aron, A. R. (2015). It’s not too late: The onset of the frontocentral P3 indexes successful response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Psychophysiology, 52, 472–480. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12374
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.264 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 8, 2022
Accepted on: Feb 1, 2023
Published on: May 4, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2023 Roos A. Doekemeijer, Anneleen Dewulf, Frederick Verbruggen, C. Nico Boehler, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.