References
- Albert, S., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2018). Repair: The interface between interaction and cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10, 279–313. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12339
- Almor, A. (2008). Why does language interfere with vision-based tasks? Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 260–268. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.4.260
- Arnold, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Altmann, R. J., & Fagnano, M. (2004). The old and thee, uh, new: Disfluency and reference resolution. Psychological Science, 15, 578–582. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.x
- Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Clarendon Press.
- Bangerter, A., & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27(2), 195–225. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2702_3
- Barthel, M., & Levinson, S. C. (2020). Next speakers plan word forms in overlap with the incoming turn: evidence from gaze-contingent switch task performance. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(9), 1183–1202. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2020.1716030
- Barthel, M., Meyer, A. S., & Levinson, S. C. (2017). Next speakers plan their turn early speak after turn-final “go-signals”. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 393. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00393
- Barthel, M., & Sauppe, S. (2019). Speech planning at turn transitions in dialog is associated with increased processing load. Cognitive Science, 43(7),
e12768 . DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12768 - Barthel, M., Sauppe, S., Levinson, S. C., & Meyer, A. S. (2016). The timing of utterance planning in task-oriented dialogue: Evidence from a novel list-completion paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01858
- Bartolozzi, F., Jongman, S. R., & Meyer, A. S. (2021). Concurrent speech planning does not elimiate repetition priming from spoken words: Evidence from linguistic dual-tasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 47(3), 466–480. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000944
- Bögels, S. (2020). Neural correlates of turn-taking in the wild: Response planning starts early in free interviews. Cognition, 203, 104347. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104347
- Bögels, S., Casillas, M., & Levinson, S. C. (2018). Planning versus comprehension in turn-taking: Fast responders show reduced anticipatory processing of the question. Neuropsychologia, 109, 295–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.028
- Bögels, S., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Never say no … How the brain interprets the pregnant pause in conversation. PlosOne, 10(12),
e0145474 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145474 - Bögels, S., Magyari, L., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 1–11. DOI: 10.1038/srep12881
- Bögels, S., & Torreira, F. (2015). Listeners use intonational phrase boundaries to project turn ends in spoken interaction. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 46–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.04.004
- Bögels, S., & Torreira, F. (2021). Turn-end estimation in conversational turn-taking: The roles of context prosody. Discourse Processes, 58(10), 903–924. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2021.1986664
- Boiteau, T. W., Malone, P. S., Peters, S. A., & Almor, A. (2014). Interference between conversation and a concurrent visuomotor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 295–311. DOI: 10.1037/a0031858
- Boland, J. E., Fonseca, P., Mermelstein, I., & Williamson, M. (2021).
Zoom disrupts the rhythm of conversation . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001150 - Brehm, L., & Meyer, A. S. (2021). Planning when to say: Dissociating cue use in utterance initiation using cross-validation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(9), 1772–1799. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001012
- Brown-Schmidt, S., & Konopka, A. E. (2015). Processes of incremental message planning during conversation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(3), 833–843. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0714-2
- Burki, A., Elbuy, S., Madec, S., & Vasishth, S. (2020). What did we learn from forty years of research on semantic interference? A Bayesian meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 114, 104125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104125
- Calhoun, S., Carletta, J., Brenier, J. M., Mayo, N., Jurafsky, D., Steedman, M., & Beaver, D. (2010). The NXT-format switchboard corpus: A rich resource for investigating the syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and prosody of dialogue. Language Resources and Evaluation, 44, 387–419. DOI: 10.1007/s10579-010-9120-1
- Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
- Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3
- Cohen, L., Salondy, P., Pallier, C., & Dehaene, S. (2021). How does inattention affect written and spoken language processing? Cortex, 138, 212–227. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.007
- Corps, R. E., Crossley, A., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). Early preparation during turn-taking: Listeners use content predictions to determine what to say but not when to say it. Cognition, 175, 77–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.015
- Corps, R. E., Gambi, M. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2020). How do listeners time response articulation when answering questions? The role of speech rate. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 46(4), 781–802. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000759
- Corps, R. E., Knudsen, B., & Meyer, A. S. (2022). Overrated gaps: Inter-speaker gaps provide limited information about the timing of turns in conversation. Cognition, 223, 105037. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105037
- Corps, R. E., Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2019). Predicting turn-ends in discourse context. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 34(5), 615–627. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1552008
- Crible, L. (2019).
Discourse markers and (dis)fluency . Forms and functions across languages and registers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.286 - Crible, L., & Pascual, E. (2020). Combinations of discourse markers with repairs and repetitions in English, French and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 54–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.002
- Dahan, D., & Ferreira, F. (2019).
Language comprehension: Insights from research on spoken language . In P. Hagoort (Ed.), Human Language: From Genes and Brains to Behavior (pp. 21–33). MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/10841.003.0005 - De Ruiter, J. P., & Albert, S. (2017). An appeal for a methodological fusing of conversation analysis and experimental psychology. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50, 90–107. DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2017.1262050
- De Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. J. (2006). Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 82, 515–535. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2006.0130
- Donders, F. C. (1868). Over de snelheid van psychische processe. [On the speed of psychical processes]. Onderzoeking gedaan in het Physiologisch Laboratorium der Utrechtsche Hoogeschool, 1868–1869. [Research conducted in the Physiological Laboratorium of Utrechtsche Hoogeschool] Tweede reeks [Second series], II, (pp. 92–120), cited in Roelofs, 2018.
- Drew, P. (2009).
Quit talking while I’m interrupting: a comparison between positions of overlap onset in conversation . In M. Haakana, M. Laakso & J. Lindström (Eds.), Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions (pp. 70–93). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. - Fairs, A., Bögels, S., & Meyer, A. S. (2018). Dual-tasking with simple linguistic tasks: Evidence for serial processing. Acta Psychologica, 191, 131–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.006
- Fargier, R., & Laganaro, M. (2016). Neurophysiological modulations of non-verbal and verbal dual-tasks interference during word planning. PloS One, 11. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168358
- Ferreira, F. (1991). Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(2), 210–233. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90004-4
- Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, K. (2006). The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(7–8), 1011–1029. DOI: 10.1080/016909600824609
- Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1187. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1187
- Fox Tree, J. E., & Clark, H. H. (1997). Pronouncing “the” as “thee” to signal problems in speaking. Cognition, 62, 151–167. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00781-0
- Francis, W. S., Gurrola, B. V., & Martinez, M. (2022). Comprehension exposures to words in sentence contexts impact spoken word production. Memory & Cognition, 50(1), 192–215. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01214-w
- Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 8–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016
- Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 292–304. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01020.x
- Gisladottir, R. S., Bögels, S., & Levinson, S. C. (2018). Oscillatory brain responses reflect anticipation during comprehension of speech acts in spoken dialog. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00034
- Gisladottir, R. S., Chwilla, D. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Conversation electrified: ERP correlates of speech act recognition in underspecified utterances. Plos One, 10. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120068
- Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
- Gravano, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2011). Turn-taking cues in task-oriented dialogue. Computer Speech and Language, 25, 601–634. DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2010.10.003
- Hardy, S. M., Wheeldon, L., & Segaert, K. (2020). Structural priming is determined by global syntax rather than internal phrasal structure: Evidence from young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 46(4), 720–740. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000754
- He, J., Meyer, A. S., Creemers, A., & Brehm, L. (2021). Conducting language production research online: A web-based study of semantic context and name agreement effects in multi-word production. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1), 29935. DOI: 10.1525/collabra.29935
- Heldner, M., & Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 555–568. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002
- Holler, J., Alday, P. M., Decuyper, C., Geiger, M., Kendrick, K. H., & Meyer, A. S. (2021), Competition reduces response times in multiparty conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 693124. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693124
- Holler, J., & Levinson, S. C. (2019). Multimodal language processing in human communication. Trends in Cognitive Science, 23(8), 639–652. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006
- Holler, J., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C. (2018). Processing language in face-to-face conversation: Questions with gestures get faster responses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1900–1908. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1363-z
- Horton, W. S. (2017).
Theories and approaches to the study of conversation and interactive discourse . In M. F. Schober, D. N. Rapp & M. A. Britt (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Processes (2nd Edition; pp. 22–68). Routledge Press. DOI: 10.4324/9781315687384-3 - Hubbard, R. J., & Federmeier, K. D. (2021). Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension. Brain Research, 1764, 147466. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147466
- Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014
- Huettig, F., Audring, J., & Jackendoff, R. (2022). A parallel architecture perspective on pre-activation and prediction in language processing. Cognition, 224, 105050. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105050
- Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: a critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 255. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
- Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
- Ivanova, I., Horton, W. S., Swets, B., Kleinman, D., & Ferreira, V. S. (2020). Structural alignment in dialogue and monologue (and what attention may have to do with it). Journal of Memory and Language, 110, 104052. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104052
- Jacobs, C. L., Cho, S. J., & Watson, D. G. (2019). Self-Priming in production: Evidence for a hybrid model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 43(7).
E12749 . DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12749 - Jacquemot, C., & Bachaud-Levi, A. C. (2021). Striatum and language processing: Where do we stand? Cognition, 213, 104785. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104785
- Jefferson, G. (1986). Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies, 153–183. DOI: 10.1007/BF00148125
- Jefferson, G. (2004).
A sketch of some orderly aspects of overlap in natural conversation . In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 43–59). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.125.05jef - Jongman, S. R., Piai, V., & Meyer, A. S. (2020). Planning for language production: The electrophysiological signature of attention to the cue to speak. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 915–932. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1690153
- Kandylaki, K. D., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2019). From story comprehension to the neurobiology of language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(4), 405–410. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1584679
- Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., & Kello, C. T. (2015). The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production and reading aloud: evidence and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1457. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01457
- Kendrick, K. H., & Holler, J. (2017). Gaze direction signals response preference in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 12–32. DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2017.1262120
- Kendrick, K. H., & Torreira, F. (2015). The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52(4), 255–289. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997
- Knudsen, B., Creemers, A., & Meyer, A. S. (2020). Forgotten little words: How backchannels and particles may facilitate speech planning in conversation? Frontiers, 11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593671
- Konopka, A. E. (2019). Encoding actions and verbs: Tracking the time-course of relational encoding during message and sentence formulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(8), 1486–1510. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000650
- Krause, P. A., & Kawamoto, A. H. (2020). On the timing and coordination of articulatory movements: Historical perspectives and current theoretical challenges. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(6),
e12373 . DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12373 - Kuhlen, A. K., Bogler, C., Brennan, S. E., & Haynes, J. D. (2017). Brains in dialogue. Decoding neural preparation of speaking to a conversational partner. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12, 871–880. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0341-8
- Kuhlen, A. K., & Rahman, R. A. (2022). Mental chronometry of speaking in dialogue: Semantic interference turns into facilitation. Cognition, 219. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104962
- Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31, 32–59. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
- Kurtić, E., & Gorisch, J. (2018). F0 accommodation and turn competition in overlapping talk. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 376–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.006
- Lee, E. K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Watson, D. G. (2013). Ways of looking ahead: Hierarchical planning in language production. Cognition, 129(3), 544–562. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.007
- Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99001776
- Levinson, S. C. (2016). Turn-taking in human communication–origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 6–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.010
- Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
- Magyari, L., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., de Ruiter, J. P., & Levinson, S. C. (2014). Early anticipation lies behind the speed of response in conversation. Journal of Cognition and Neuroscience, 26, 2530–2539. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00673
- Magyari, L., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2012). Prediction of turn-ends based on anticipation of upcoming words. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 376. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00376
- Magyari, L., de Ruiter, J. P., & Levinson, S. C. (2017). Temporal preparation for speaking in question-answer sequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 211. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00211
- Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Varga, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 503–535. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
- Meyer, A. S., Alday, P. M., Decuyper, C., & Knudsen, B. (2018). Working together: Contributions of corpus analyses and experimental psycholinguistics to understanding conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00525
- Nota, N., Trujllo, J. P., & Holler, J. (2021). Facial Signals and Social Actions in Multimodal Face-to-Face Interaction. Brain Sciences, 11, 8.1017. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11081017
- Papafragou, A., & Grigoroglou, M. (2019). The role of conceptualization during language production: evidence from event encoding. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(9), 1117–1128. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1589540
- Piai, V., Roelofs, A., Rommers, J., Dahlstaett, K., & Maris, E. (2015). Withholding planned speech is reflected in synchronized beta-band oscillations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00549
- Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427–459. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427
- Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
- Rasenberg, M., Ozyurek, A., Bogels, S., & Dingemanse, M. (2022). The primacy of multimodal alignment in converging on shared symbols for novel referents. Discourse Processes, 59, 209–236. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2021.1992235
- Riest, C., Jorschick, A. B., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2015). Anticipation in turn-taking: mechanisms and information sources. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 89. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00089
- Roberts, S. G., Torreira, F., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). The effects of processing and sequence organization on the timing of turn taking: a corpus study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 509. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00509
- Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42(1), 107–142. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F
- Roelofs, A. (2018). One hundred fifty years after Donders: Insight from unpublished data, a replication, and modeling of his reaction times. Acta Psychologica, 191, 228–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.002
- Roelofs, A. (2021). How Attention Controls Naming: Lessons From Wundt 2.0. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(10), 1927–1955. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001030
- Roelofs, A., & Ferreira, V. S. (2019).
The architecture of speaking . In P. Hagoort (Ed.), Human language: From genes and brains to behavior (pp. 35–50). MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/10841.003.0006 - Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2011). Attention demands of spoken word planning: a review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 307. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00307
- Romani, C., Silverstein, P., Ramoo, D., & Olson, A. (2022). Effects of delay, length, and frequency on onset RTs and word durations: Articulatory planning uses flexible units but cannot be prepared. Cognitive Neuropsychology. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/g42fb
- Rühlemann, C., & Gries, S. T. (2020). Speakers advance-project turn completion by slowing down: A multifactorial corpus analysis. Journal of Phonetics, 80, 100976. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100976
- Sacks, H. J., Schlegoff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50008-2
- Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095. DOI: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
- Schegloff, E. A. (1982).
Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences . In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing text and talk (pp. 71–93). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press. - Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1–63. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404500001019
- Schegloff, E. A. (2007).
Sequence organization in interaction . A primer in conversation analysis. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208 - Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. DOI: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
- Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. DOI: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
- Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
- Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
- Segaert, K., Wheeldon, L., & Hagoort, P. (2016). Unifying structural priming effects on syntactic choices and timing of sentence generation. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 59–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.011
- Sjerps, M. J., Decuyper, C., & Meyer, A. S. (2019). Initiation of utterance planning in response to pre-recorded and “live” utterances. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(3), 357–374. DOI: 10.1177/1747021819881265
- Sjerps, M. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2015). Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking. Cognition, 136, 304–324. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.008
- Skantze, G. (2021). Turn-taking in conversational systems and human-robot interaction: Review: A review. Computer Speech & Language, 67, 101178. DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2020.101178
- Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., … & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10587–10592. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
- Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31. DOI: 10.1080/08351810903471258
- Templeton, E. M., Chang, L. J., Reynolds, E. A., Cone LeBeaumont, M. D., & Wheatley, T. (2022). Fast response times signal social connection in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119, 4, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2116915119
- Tolins, J., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2014). Addressee backchannels steer narrative development. Journal of Pragmatics, 70, 152–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.006
- Tolins, J., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2016). Overhearers use addressee backchannels in dialog comprehension. Cognitive Science, 40, 1412–1434. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12278
- Tomasello, R., Grisoni, L., Boux, I., Sammerler, D., & Pulvermuller, F. (2022). Instantaneous Neural Processing of Communicative Functions Conveyed by Speech Prosody. Cerebral Cortex, 5(16). DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab522
- Tooley, K. M. (2022). Structural priming during comprehension: A pattern from many pieces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02209-7
- Tsuboi, N., Francis, W. W., & Jameson, J. T. (2021). How word comprehension exposures facilitate later spoken production: implications for lexical processing and repetition priming. Memory, 29(1), 39–58. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1845740
- Verga, L., & Kotz, S. A. (2019). Putting language back into ecological communication contexts. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(4), 536–544. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1506886
- Wehbe, L., Blank, IA, Shain, C., Futrell, R, Levy, R., von der Malsburg, T., Smith, N., Gibson, E., & Fedorenko, E. (2021). Incremental Language Comprehension Difficulty Predicts Activity in the Language Network but Not the Multiple Demand Network. Cerebral Cortex, 31(9), 4006–4023. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab065
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.268 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 9, 2022
Accepted on: Mar 17, 2023
Published on: Apr 5, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2023 Antje S. Meyer, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.