Do Task Sets Compete in the Stroop Task and Other Selective Attention Paradigms?
References
- Aarts, E., Roelofs, A., & van Turennout, M. (2009). Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: Brain activity and reaction time distributions. Neuropsychologia, 47(10), 2089–2099. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.019
- Algom, D., & Chajut, E. (2019). Reclaiming the Stroop effect back from control to input-driven attention and perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1683. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01683
- Algom, D., Chajut, E., & Lev, S. (2004). A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 323–338. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.323
- Algom, D., Fitousi, D., & Chajut, E. (2022). Can the Stroop effect serve as the gold standard of conflict monitoring and control? A conceptual critique. Memory & Cognition, 50(5), 883–897. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01251-5
- Aron, A. R., Monsell, S., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2004). A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex. Brain, 127(7), 1561–1573. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh169
- Augustinova, M., Clarys, D., Spatola, N., & Ferrand, L. (2018). Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 767–774. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1427-0
- Augustinova, M., Parris, B. A., & Ferrand, L. (2019). The loci of Stroop interference and facilitation effects with manual and vocal responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1786. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01786
- Augustinova, M., Silvert, S., Spatola, N., & Ferrand, L. (2018). Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response stimulus intervals. Acta Psychologica, 189, 54–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.009
- Bench, C. J., Frith, C. D., Grasby, P. M., Friston, K. J., Paulesu, E., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Dolan, R. J. (1993). Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test. Neuropsychologia, 31(9), 907–922. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90147-R
- Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
- Braem, S., Bugg, J. M., Schmidt, J. R., Crump, M. J., Weissman, D. H., Notebaert, W., & Egner, T. (2019). Measuring adaptive control in conflict tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(9), 769–783. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.002
- Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
- Brown, J. W., & Braver, T. S. (2005). Learned predictions of error likelihood in the anterior cingulate cortex. Science, 307(5712), 1118–1121. DOI: 10.1126/science.1105783
- Brown, T. L. (2011). The relationship between Stroop interference and facilitation effects: Statistical artifacts, baselines, and a reassessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 85–99. DOI: 10.1037/a0019252
- Brown, T. L., Roos-Gilbert, L., & Carr, T. H. (1995). Automaticity and word perception: Evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1395–1411. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1395
- Burca, M., Beaucousin, V., Chausse, P., Ferrand, L., Parris, B. A. & Augustinova, M. (2021) Is there semantic conflict in the Stroop task? Further evidence from a modified two-to-one Stroop paradigm combined with single-letter coloring and cueing. Experimental Psychology, 68(5), 274–283. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000530
- Burca, M., Chausse, P., Ferrand, L., Parris, B. A., & Augustinova, M. (2022). Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference: insights from the two-to-one Stroop paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 29(2), 492–500. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-02011-x
- Burt, J. S. (1994). Identity primes produce facilitation in a colour naming task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47(A), 957–1000. DOI: 10.1080/14640749408401103
- Burt, J. S. (1999). Associative priming in color naming: Interference and facilitation. Memory and Cognition, 27(3), 454–464. DOI: 10.3758/BF03211540
- Burt, J. S. (2002). Why do non-colour words interfere with colour naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1019–1038. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1019
- Carter, C. S., Mintun, M., & Cohen, J. D. (1995). Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: an H215O PET study of Stroop task performance. Neuroimage, 2(4), 264–272. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1995.1034
- Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97(3), 332. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332
- Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
- Coltheart, M., Woollams, A., Kinoshita, S., & Perry, C. (1999). A position-sensitive Stroop effect: Further evidence for a left-to-right component in print-to-speech conversion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(3), 456–463. DOI: 10.3758/BF03210835
- Cramer, P. (1967). The Stroop effect in preschool aged children: A preliminary study. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 111(1), 9–12. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.1967.10533742
- Dalrymple-Alford, E. C. (1972). Associative facilitation and interference in the Stroop color-word task. Perception & Psychophysics, 11(4), 274–276. DOI: 10.3758/BF03210377
- Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Budayr, B. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23(3), 1211–1214. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1966.23.3f.1211
- De Houwer, J. (2014). A propositional perspective on context effects in human associative learning. Behavioral Processes, 104, 20–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.002
- De Houwer, J. (2021). On the challenges of cognitive psychopathology research and possible ways forward: Arguments for a pragmatic cognitive approach. Current Opinion in Psychology, 41, 96–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.005
- Dewhurst, S. A., & Barry, C. (2006). Dissociating word frequency and age of acquisition: The Klein effect revived (and reversed). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 919–924. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.919
- Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). The distractor frequency effect in picture–word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 878–891. DOI: 10.1037/a0019128
- Diede, N. T., & Bugg, J. M. (2017). Cognitive effort is modulated outside of the explicit awareness of conflict frequency: Evidence from pupillometry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 43(5), 824–835. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000349
- Elchlepp, H., Monsell, S., & Lavric, A. (2021). How Task Set and Task Switching Modulate Perceptual Processes: Is Recognition of Facial Emotion an Exception? Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 36. DOI: 10.5334/joc.179
- Entel, O., & Tzelgov, J. (2018). Focussing on task conflict in the Stroop effect. Psychological Research, 82(2), 284–295. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0832-8
- Entel, O., & Tzelgov, J. (2020). When working memory meets control in the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(7), 1387–1406. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000790
- Entel, O., Tzelgov, J., Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Shahar, N. (2015). Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task. Psychological Research, 79, 913–927. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0630-0
- Evans, N. J., & Servant, M. (2022). A model-based approach to disentangling facilitation and interference effects in conflict tasks. Psychology Review, 129(5), 1183–1209. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000357
- Fellows, L. K., & Farah, M. J. (2005). Is anterior cingulate cortex necessary for cognitive control? Brain, 128(4), 788–796. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh405
- Ferrand, L., Ducrot, S., Chausse, P., Maïonchi-Pino, N., O’Connor, R. J., Parris, B. A., Perret, P., Riggs, K. J., & Augustinova, M. (2020). Stroop interference is a composite phenomenon: Evidence from distinct developmental trajectories of its components. Developmental Science, 23(2),
e12899 . DOI: 10.1111/desc.12899 - Floden, D., Vallesi, A., & Stuss, D. T. (2011). Task context and frontal lobe activation in the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(4), 867–879. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21492
- Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(1), 13–42. PMID: 2522504. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.118.1.13
- Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2007). Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1170–1176. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1170
- Hasshim, N., & Parris, B. (2014). Two-to-one color-response mapping and the presence of semantic conflict in the Stroop task. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1157. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01157
- Hasshim, N., & Parris, B. A. (2015). Assessing stimulus–stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures. Attention Perception and Psychophysics, 77, 2601–2610. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0971-9
- Hasshim, N., & Parris, B. A. (2018). Trial type mixing substantially reduces the response set effect in the Stroop task. Acta Psychologica, 189, 43–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.002
- Hasshim, N., & Parris, B. A. (2021). The role of contingency and correlation in the Stroop task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(10), 1657–1668. DOI: 10.1177/17470218211032548
- Hershman, R., Beckmann, L., & Henik, A. (2022). Task and informational conflicts in the numerical Stroop task. Psychophysiology, 59,
e14057. 01311–6 DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14057 - Hershman, R., & Henik, A. (2019). Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 45(10), 1899–1909. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000690
- Hershman, R., & Henik, A. (2020) Pupillometric contributions to deciphering Stroop conflicts. Memory & Cognition, 48, 325–333. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00971-z
- Hershman, R., Levin, Y., Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (2021). Neutral stimuli and pupillometric task conflict. Psychological Research, 85(3), 1084–1092. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01311-6
- Jonides, J. & Mack, R. (1984). On the Cost and Benefit of Cost and Benefit. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 29–44. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.29
- Kalanthroff, E., Avnit, A., Henik, A., Davelaar, E., & Usher, M. (2015). Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22(3), 869–875. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0735-x
- Kalanthroff, E., Davelaar, E., Henik, A., Goldfarb, L., & Usher, M. (2018). Task conflict and proactive control: A computational theory of the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 125(1), 59–82. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000083
- Kalanthroff, E., Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2013b). Evidence for interaction between the Stop Signal and the Stroop task conflict. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 579–592. DOI: 10.1037/a0027429
- Kalanthroff, E., Goldfarb, L., Usher, M., & Henik, A. (2013a). Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(7), 1356–1367. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.741606
- Kalanthroff, E., & Henik, A. (2014). Preparation time modulates pro-active control and enhances task conflict in task switching. Psychological Research, 78, 276–288. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0495-7
- Kalanthroff, E., Henik, A., Simpson, H. B., Todder, D., & Anholt, G. E. (2017). To do or not to do: Task control deficit in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behavior Therapy, 48(5), 603–613. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.01.004
- Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science, 154(3756), 1583–1585. DOI: 10.1126/science.154.3756.1583
- Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1), 47–70. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47
- Kinoshita, S., De Wit, B, & Norris, D. (2017). The magic of words reconsidered: Investigating the automaticity of reading color-neutral words in the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 43(3), 369–384. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000311
- Kinoshita, S., Mills, L., & Norris, D. (2018). The semantic stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 44(11), 1730–1742. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000552
- Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. The American Journal of Psychology, 77(4), 576–588. DOI: 10.2307/1420768
- Koch, I., & Lavric, A. (2020). Has “Erasing” Made Things Clearer? Commentary on Schmidt, Liefooghe & De Houwer (2020, JoC): “An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory”. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 25. DOI: 10.5334/joc.111
- La Heij, W., & Boelens, H. (2011). Colour-object interference: Further tests of an executive control account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(1), 156–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.007
- La Heij, W., Boelens, H., & Kuipers, J. R. (2010). Object interference in children’s colour and position naming: Lexical interference or task-set competition? Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(4), 568–588. DOI: 10.1080/01690960903381174
- Laeng, B., Sirois, S., & Gredebäck, G. (2012). Pupillometry: A Window to the Preconscious? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(1), 18–27. DOI: 10.1177/1745691611427305
- Levin, Y., & Tzelgov, T. (2016). What Klein’s “semantic gradient” does and does not really show: Decomposing Stroop interference into task and informational conflict components. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 249. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00249
- Lindsay, D. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(2), 219–234. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.219
- Littman, R., & Kalanthroff, E. (2020). Control over task conflict in the Stroop and affordances tasks: an individual differences study. Psychological Research, 85(6), 2420–2427. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01411-3
- Littman, R., & Kalanthroff, E. (2022). Neutral affordances: Task conflict in the affordances task. Consciousness and Cognition, 97,
103262 . DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103262 - Littman, R., Keha, E., & Kalanthroff, E. (2019). Task conflict and task control: A mini-review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1598. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01598
- Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7(3), 166–174. DOI: 10.3758/BF03197535
- Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485–495. DOI: 10.3758/BF03198265
- MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
- MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(10), 383–391. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01530-8
- Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 503–535. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
- Marmurek, H. H. C., Proctor, C., & Javor, A. (2006). Stroop-like serial position effects in colour naming of words and nonwords. Experimental Psychology, 53(2), 105–110. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.2.105
- Martinon, L. M., Ferrand, L., Burca, M., Hasshim, N., Lakzoum, D., Parris, B. A., Silvert, L., & Augustinova, M. (submitted). Distributional analyses reveal the polymorphic Nature of the Stroop Interference Effect: It’s about (response) time.
- McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
- Mewhort, D. J., Braun, J. G., & Heathcote, A. (1992). Response time distributions and the Stroop Task: A test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 872–882. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.872
- Milham, M. P., Erickson, K. I., Banich, M. T., Kramer, A. F., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., & Cohen, N. J. (2002). Attentional control in the aging brain: insights from an fMRI study of the stroop task. Brain and cognition, 49(3), 277–296. DOI: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1501
- Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 228–252. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.228
- Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
- Monsell, S., & McLaren, I. (2020). PEP Does Not Dispense with but Implements Task-Set Reconfiguration. Can It Handle Phenomena More Diagnostic of Endogenous Control? Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 27. DOI: 10.5334/joc.109
- Monsell, S., Taylor, T. J., & Murphy, K. (2001). Naming the colour of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? Memory & Cognition, 29(1), 137–151. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195748
- Mulatti, C., & Coltheart, M. (2012). Picture-word interference and the response-exclusion hypothesis. Cortex, 48(3), 363–372. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.025
- Navarrete, E., Sessa, P., Peressotti, F., & Dell’Acqua, R. (2015). The distractor frequency effect in the colour-naming Stroop task: An overt naming event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 277–289. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2014.1002786
- Parris, B. A. (2014). Task conflict in the Stroop task: When Stroop interference decreases as Stroop facilitation increases in a low task conflict context. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1182. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01182
- Parris, B. A., Hasshim, N., & Dienes, Z. (2021). Look into my eyes: Pupillometry reveals that a post-hypnotic suggestion for word blindness reduces Stroop interference by marshalling greater effortful control. European Journal of Neuroscience, 53(8), 2819–2834. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15105
- Parris, B. A., Hasshim, N., Wadsley, M., Augustinova, M., & Ferrand, L. (2022). The loci of Stroop effects: a critical review of methods and evidence for levels of processing contributing to color-word Stroop effects and the implications for the loci of attentional selection. Psychological Research, 86(4), 1029–1053. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01554-x
- Parris, B. A., Wadsley, M. G., Hasshim, N., Benattayallah, A., Augustinova, M., & Ferrand, L. (2019). An fMRI study of Response and Semantic conflict in the Stroop task. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2426. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02426
- Prevor, M. B., & Diamond, A. (2005). Color–object interference in young children: A Stroop effect in children 31⁄2–61⁄2 years old. Cognitive Development, 20(2), 256–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.04.001
- Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110(1), 88–125. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.88
- Roelofs, A. (2010). Attention and Facilitation: Converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(2), 411–422. DOI: 10.1037/a0018523
- Roelofs, A. (2014). Tracking eye movements to localize Stroop interference in naming: word planning versus articulatory buffering. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5), 1332–1347. DOI: 10.1037/a0036575
- Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207–231. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
- Schmidt, J. R. (2019). Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 26(3), 753–771. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1520-z
- Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 514–523. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514
- Schmidt, J. R., Liefooghe, B., & De Houwer, J. (2020). An episodic model of task switching effects: erasing the homunculus from memory. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 22. DOI: 10.5334/joc.97
- Schulz, L., Ischebeck, A., Wriessnegger, S. C., Steyrl, D., & Müller-Putz, G. R. (2018). Action affordances and visuo-spatial complexity in motor imagery: an fMRI study. Brain and Cognition, 124, 37–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.03.012
- Shichel, I., & Tzelgov, J. (2018). Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect. Acta Psychologica, 189, 93–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.10.007
- Shahar, N., & Meiran, N. (2015). Differential contribution of task conflicts to task switch cost and task mixing cost in alternating runs and cued task-switching: evidence from ex-Gaussian modeling of reaction time distributions. Psychological Research, 79, 259–256. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0569-1
- Spinelli, G., & Lupker, S. J. (2021). Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(10), 1550–1562. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000820
- Spinelli, G., & Lupker, S. J. (2022). Robust evidence for proactive conflict adaptation in the proportion-congruent paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001144
- Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2007). Automatic activation of task-related representations in task shifting. Memory & Cognition, 35, 138–155. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195950
- Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2009). Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1398–1412. DOI: 10.1037/a0016467
- Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. DOI: 10.1037/h0054651
- Taft, M. (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllable structure. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 21–39. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90544-9
- Taft, M. (1987).
Morphographic processing: The BOSS re-emerges . In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 265–279). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. - van Boxtel, G. J. M., van der Molen, M. W., & Jennings, J. R. (2005). Differential involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in performance monitoring during a stop-signal task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 1–10. DOI: 10.1027/0269-8803.19.1.1
- Van Voorhis, B. A., & Dark, V. J. (1995). Semantic matching, response mode, and response mapping as contributors to retroactive and proactive priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(4), 913–932. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.913
- Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2004) The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distracter interference in the flanker and Stroop task. Acta Psychologica, 116(1), 21–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.011
- Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601–626. DOI: 10.1037/a0019791
- Zahedi, A., Rahman, R. A., Stürmer, B., & Sommer, W. (2019). Common and specific loci of Stroop effects in vocal and manual tasks, revealed by event-related brain potentials and post-hypnotic suggestions. Journal of Experiment Psychology: General, 148(9), 1575–1594. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000574
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.272 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 7, 2022
Accepted on: Mar 31, 2023
Published on: May 4, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2023 Benjamin A. Parris, Nabil Hasshim, Ludovic Ferrand, Maria Augustinova, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.