Similar Quality of Visual Working Memory Representations between Negative and Positive Attentional Templates
References
- Arita, J. T., Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2012). Templates for rejection: Configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 580–584. DOI: 10.1037/a0027885
- Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2008). Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision. Science, 321(5890), 851–854. DOI: 10.1126/science.1158023
- Beck, V. M., Luck, S. J., & Hollingworth, A. (2018). Whatever you do, don’t look at the …: Evaluating guidance by an exclusionary attentional template. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(4), 645–662. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000485
- Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological review, 97(4), 523. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.523
- Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbæk, S. (2005). A Neural Theory of Visual Attention: Bridging Cognition and Neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112(2), 291–328. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.291
- Carlisle, N. B. (2019). Focus: Attention science: Flexibility in attentional control: Multiple sources and suppression. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 92(1), 103–113.
- Carlisle, N. B. (2023). Negative and positive templates: Two forms of cued attentional control. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 85(3), 585–595. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02590-4
- Carlisle, N. B., Arita, J. T., Pardo, D., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Attentional Templates in Visual Working Memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(25), 9315–9322. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1097-11.2011
- Carlisle, N. B., & Nitka, A. W. (2019). Location-based explanations do not account for active attentional suppression. Visual Cognition, 27(3–4), 305–316. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2018.1553222
- Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). When memory is not enough: Electrophysiological evidence for goal-dependent use of working memory representations in guiding visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 2650–2664. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21602
- Chidharom, M., & Carlisle, N. B. (2023). Neurophysiological Measures of Proactive and Reactive Control in Negative Template Use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–12. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01996
- Chidharom, M., & Carlisle, N. B. (2024a). Distinct Mechanisms of Attentional Suppression: Exploration of Trait Factors Underlying Cued- and Learned-Suppression. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 9(26). DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00554-w
- Chidharom, M., & Carlisle, N. B. (2024b). Why Are Some Individuals Better at Using Negative Attentional Templates to Suppress Distractors? Exploration of Interindividual Differences in Cognitive Control Efficiency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, in press. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001214
- Conci, M., Deichsel, C., Müller, H. J., & Töllner, T. (2019). Feature guidance by negative attentional templates depends on search difficulty. Visual Cognition, 27(3–4), 317–326. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1581316
- deBettencourt, M. T., Keene, P. A., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2019). Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(8), 808–816. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0606-6
- Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
- de Vries, I. E., Savran, E., van Driel, J., & Olivers, C. N. (2019). Oscillatory mechanisms of preparing for visual distraction. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 31(12), 1873–1894. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01460
- Dube, B., & Al-Aidroos, N. (2019). Distinct prioritization of visual working memory representations for search and for recall. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 1253–1261. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-01664-6
- Dube, B., Basciano, A., Emrich, S. M., & Al-Aidroos, N. (2016). Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search. Attention, Perception & psychophysics, 78, 1232–1244. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1105-8
- Dube, B., Emrich, S. M., & Al-Aidroos, N. (2017). More than a filter: Feature-based attention regulates the distribution of visual working memory resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(10), 1843–1854. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000428
- Geng, J., & DiQuattro, N. (2009). Attentional capture by a salient non-target improves target selection. Journal of Vision, 9(8), 109–109. DOI: 10.1167/9.8.109
- Gonthier, C., Zira, M., Colé, P., & Blaye, A. (2019). Evidencing the developmental shift from reactive to proactive control in early childhood and its relationship to working memory. Journal of experimental child psychology, 177, 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.07.001
- Hollingworth, A. (2022).
The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention . In Visual memory (pp. 26–48). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003158134-3 - Kerzel, D. (2019). The precision of attentional selection is far worse than the precision of the underlying memory representation. Cognition, 186, 20–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.001
- Lin, Y., Brough, R. E., Tay, A., Jackson, J. J., & Braver, T. S. (2022). Working memory capacity preferentially enhances implementation of proactive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001195
- Lively, Z., Robinson, M. M., & Benjamin, A. S. (2021). Memory Fidelity Reveals Qualitative Changes in Interactions Between Items in Visual Working Memory. Psychological Science, 32(9), 1426–1441. DOI: 10.1177/0956797621997367
- Moher, J., & Egeth, H. E. (2012). The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1590–1605. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0358-0
- Oberauer, K. (2019). Working Memory and Attention – A Conceptual Analysis and Review. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 298–23. DOI: 10.5334/joc.58
- Olivers, C. N. L. (2011). Long-term visual associations affect attentional guidance. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 243–247. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.001
- Olivers, C. N., & Eimer, M. (2011). On the difference between working memory and attentional set. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1553–1558. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.033
- Palmer, J. (1990). Attentional Limits on the Perception and Memory of Visual Information. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.2.332
- Rajsic, J., Burton, J. A., & Woodman, G. F. (2019). Contralateral delay activity tracks the storage of visually presented letters and words. Psychophysiology, 56(1),
e13282 . DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13282 - Rajsic, J., Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2020). What not to look for: Electrophysiological evidence that searchers prefer positive templates. Neuropsychologia, 140, 107376. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107376
- Rajsic, J., Ouslis, N. E., Wilson, D. E., & Pratt, J. (2017). Looking sharp: Becoming a search template boosts precision and stability in visual working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(6), 1643–1651. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1342-5
- Rajsic, J., & Woodman, G. F. (2020). Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(1), 269–279. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01721-8
- Redick, T. S. (2014). Cognitive control in context: Working memory capacity and proactive control. Acta Psychologica, 145, 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.010
- Reeder, R. R., Olivers, C. N. L., Hanke, M., & Pollmann, S. (2018). No evidence for enhanced distractor template representation in early visual cortex. Cortex, 108, 279–282. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.005
- Reeder, R. R., Olivers, C. N. L., & Pollmann, S. (2017). Cortical evidence for negative search templates. Visual Cognition, 25(1–3), 278–290. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1339755
- Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470. DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1455
- Soto, D., Hodsoll, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in cognitive sciences, 12(9), 342–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.007
- Suchow, J. W., Brady, T. F., Fougnie, D., & Alvarez, G. A. (2013). Modeling visual working memory with the MemToolbox. Journal of Vision, 13(10), 9–9. DOI: 10.1167/13.10.9
- Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428(6984), 748–751. DOI: 10.1038/nature02447
- Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438(7067), 500–503. DOI: 10.1038/nature04171
- Wiemers, E. A., & Redick, T. S. (2018). Working memory capacity and intra-individual variability of proactive control. Acta Psychologica, 182, 21–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.002
- Wilken, P., & Ma, W. J. (2004). A detection theory account of change detection. Journal of Vision, 4(12), 11. DOI: 10.1167/4.12.11
- Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided Search: An Alternative to the Feature Integration Model for Visual Search. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.419
- Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(2), 363. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.363
- Yu, X., Hanks, T. D., & Geng, J. J. (2022). Attentional guidance and match decisions rely on different template information during visual search. Psychological science, 33(1), 105–120. DOI: 10.1177/09567976211032225
- Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453(7192), 233–235. DOI: 10.1038/nature06860
- Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2009). Sudden death and gradual decay in visual working memory. Psychological science, 20(4), 423–428. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02322.x
- Zhang, Z., Gaspelin, N., & Carlisle, N. B. (2020). Probing early attention following negative and positive templates. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(3), 1166–1175. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01864-8
- Zhang, Z., Sahatdjian, R., & Carlisle, N. B. (2022). Benefits from negative templates in easy and difficult search depend on rapid distractor rejection and enhanced guidance. Vision Research, 197, 108031. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108031
- Zhao, C., Vogel, E., & Awh, E. (2022). Change localization: A highly reliable and sensitive measure of capacity in visual working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02586-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.380 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 2, 2023
Accepted on: Jun 22, 2024
Published on: Jul 16, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2024 Matthieu Chidharom, Mahsa Zafarmand, Nancy B. Carlisle, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.