Table 1
Means (and Standard Deviations) of Correct and Error Trials RTs.
| VARIABLES | CORRECT TRIALS | ERROR TRIALS | P-VALUE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Task-wide | 629.71 (51.18) | 617.83 (63.95) | .043 * |
| Word trials | 606.57 (41.44) | 617.63 (60.09) | .125 |
| Pseudoword trials | 652.86 (49.95) | 618.03 (68.45) | <.001 *** |
[i] Note. Significant differences are marked in bold.
*: p < .050, ***: p < .001.
Figure 1
Conditional Accuracy Functions.
Note. Each point represents the accuracy for one quintile and one condition. Error bars show standard deviations from mean accuracy.
Table 2
Means (and Standard Deviations) of Accuracy (%) as a function of Quintiles and Conditions.
| CONDITIONS | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Words | 92.26 (5.09) | 94.02 (3.94) | 93.30 (4.18) | 93.60 (3.84) | 91.46 (4.06) |
| Pseudowords | 88.81 (9.06) | 95.63 (3.38) | 96.67 (2.64) | 97.33 (2.61) | 95.30 (3.18) |
| p-value | .056 | .010 * | <.001 *** | <.001 *** | <.001 *** |
[i] Note. Q refers to the quintiles. The p-values reflect the pairwise comparisons of accuracy between the two conditions in each quintile (Bonferroni correction was applied). Significant differences are marked in bold. *: p < .050, **: p < .010, ***: p < .001.
Table 3
Pairwise Comparisons of Accuracy Between Quintiles in each Condition.
| PAIRED QUINTILES | WORD CONDITION | PSEUDOWORD CONDITION | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | P-VALUE | T | P-VALUE | |
| Q1–Q2 | –2.39 | .224 | –6.80 | <.001 *** |
| Q1–Q3 | –1.01 | 1.000 | –7.14 | <.001 *** |
| Q1–Q4 | –1.00 | 1.000 | –8.97 | <.001 *** |
| Q1–Q5 | 1.08 | 1.000 | –4.74 | <.001 ** |
| Q2–Q3 | 1.60 | 1.000 | –1.781 | .840 |
| Q2–Q4 | 0.55 | 1.000 | –3.89 | .004 ** |
| Q2–Q5 | 3.04 | .045 * | 0.82 | 1.000 |
| Q3–Q4 | –0.49 | 1.000 | –1.50 | 1.000 |
| Q3–Q5 | 2.84 | .180 | 2.69 | .107 |
| Q4–Q5 | 3.50 | .013 * | 4.21 | .002 ** |
[i] Note. Significant differences are marked in bold. P-values were corrected using Bonferroni’s method. *: p < .050, **: p < .010, ***: p < .001.