Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Investigating the Effects of Valence, Arousal, Concreteness, and Humor on Words Unique to Singapore English Cover

Investigating the Effects of Valence, Arousal, Concreteness, and Humor on Words Unique to Singapore English

Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2006). Attentional control and the flexible lexical processor: Explorations of the magic moment of word recognition. In S. Andrews (Ed.), From Inkmarks to Ideas: Current Issues in Lexical Processing (pp. 229258).
  2. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445459. http://www.springerlink.com/index/l7121702t08h0456.pdf
  3. Bartko, J. J. (1966). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability. Psychological Reports, 19(1), 311. 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3
  4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using Lme4. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  5. Blasi, D. E., Henrich, J., Adamou, E., Kemmerer, D., & Majid, A. (2022). Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(12), 11531170. 10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.015
  6. Bolton, K., Botha, W., & Kirkpatrick, A. (Eds.). (2020). The handbook of Asian Englishes. Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118791882
  7. Bottini, R., Morucci, P., D’Urso, A., Collignon, O., & Crepaldi, D. (2022). The concreteness advantage in lexical decision does not depend on perceptual simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(3), 731738. 10.1037/xge0001090
  8. Brysbaert, M., & Diependaele, K. (2013). Dealing with zero word frequencies: A review of the existing rules of thumb and a suggestion for an evidence-based choice. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 422430. 10.3758/s13428-012-0270-5
  9. Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., McCormick, S. F., & Keuleers, E. (2019). Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 51(2), 467479. 10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9
  10. Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977990. http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
  11. Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., De Deyne, S., Voorspoels, W., & Storms, G. (2014). Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. Acta Psychologica, 150, 8084. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.010
  12. Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904911. 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
  13. Buchanan, E. M., Valentine, K. D., & Maxwell, N. P. (2019). LAB: Linguistic Annotated Bibliography – a searchable portal for normed database information. Behavior Research Methods, 51(4), 18781888. 10.3758/s13428-018-1130-8
  14. Cavallaro, F., Ng, B. C., & Tan, Y. Y. (2020). Singapore English. In K. Bolton, W. Botha, & A. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), The Handbook of Asian Englishes. John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118791882.ch18
  15. Ching, W. S. (2020). Does Singlish Contribute to Singaporean’s National Identity, and do Singaporeans Support Formal Recognition of it? International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(2), 96112. 10.6007/IJARPED/v9-i2/7244
  16. Diveica, V., Muraki, E. J., Binney, R. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2024). Socialness effects in lexical–semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 50(8), 13291343. 10.1037/xlm0001328
  17. Diveica, V., Pexman, P. M., & Binney, R. J. (2022). Quantifying social semantics: An inclusive definition of socialness and ratings for 8388 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 55(2), 461473. 10.3758/s13428-022-01810-x
  18. Duan, X., Li, S., & Cai, Z. G. (2024). MacBehaviour: An R package for behavioural experimentation on large language models. Behavior Research Methods, 57(1), 19. 10.3758/s13428-024-02524-y
  19. Engelthaler, T., & Hills, T. T. (2018). Humor norms for 4,997 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 11161124. 10.3758/s13428-017-0930-6
  20. Fatima, A., Li, Y., Hills, T. T., & Stella, M. (2021). DASentimental: Detecting Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Texts via Emotional Recall, Cognitive Networks, and Machine Learning. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 5(4), 77. 10.3390/bdcc5040077
  21. Goh, W. D., Yap, M. J., & Chee, Q. W. (2020). The Auditory English Lexicon Project: A multi-talker, multi-region psycholinguistic database of 10,170 spoken words and nonwords. Behavior Research Methods. 10.3758/s13428-020-01352-0
  22. Goh, W. D., Yap, M. J., Lau, M. C., Ng, M. M. R., & Tan, L.-C. (2016). Semantic Richness Effects in Spoken Word Recognition: A Lexical Decision and Semantic Categorization Megastudy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00976
  23. Gonzales, W. D. W., Hiramoto, M., Leimgruber, J. R. E., & Lim, J. J. (2023). The Corpus of Singapore English Messages (CoSEM). World Englishes, 42(2), 371388. 10.1111/weng.12534
  24. Groot, A. M. B. D., & Keijzer, R. (2000). What Is Hard to Learn Is Easy to Forget: The Roles of Word Concreteness, Cognate Status, and Word Frequency in Foreign-Language Vocabulary Learning and Forgetting. Language Learning, 50(1), 156. 10.1111/0023-8333.00110
  25. Gupta, A. F. (1994). The step-tongue: Children’s English in Singapore. Multilingual Matters.
  26. Haro, J., Hinojosa, J. A., & Ferré, P. (2024). The role of individual differences in emotional word recognition: Insights from a large-scale lexical decision study. Behavior Research Methods, 56(8), 85018520. 10.3758/s13428-024-02488-z
  27. Hernández-Rivera, E., Kalogeris, A., Tiv, M., & Titone, D. (2024). Self-evaluations and the language of the beholder: Objective performance and language solidarity predict L2 and L1 self-evaluations in bilingual adults. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 9(1), 75. 10.1186/s41235-024-00592-4
  28. Hills, T. T., & Adelman, J. S. (2015). Recent evolution of learnability in American English from 1800 to 2000. Cognition, 143, 8792. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.009
  29. Ho, D., Hamzah, D., Poria, S., & Cambria, E. (2018). Singlish SenticNet: A Concept-Based Sentiment Resource for Singapore English. 2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), 12851291. 10.1109/SSCI.2018.8628796
  30. Joser, J. R., Dedace, J. R., Daclizon, K., Salvaña, P. L., Nacionales, J., & Claridad, N. (2023). The rhetoric of comedy: Exploring the language and humor styles of Filipino stand-up comedians. Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies, 2(2), 7188. 10.58881/jlps.v2i2.17
  31. Keuleers, E., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 16651692. 10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560
  32. Kidd, E., & Garcia, R. (2022). How diverse is child language acquisition research? First Language, 42(6), 703735. 10.1177/01427237211066405
  33. Kirk, N. W. (2023). MIND your language(s): Recognizing Minority, Indigenous, Non-standard(ized), and Dialect variety usage in “monolinguals.” Applied Psycholinguistics, 44(3), 358364. 10.1017/S0142716422000467
  34. Koh, J. X., Mislan, A., Khoo, K., Ang, B., Ang, W., Ng, C., & Tan, Y. Y. (2019). Building the singapore english national speech corpus. Malay, 20(25.0), 1913. 10.21437/Interspeech.2019-1525
  35. Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473481. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007
  36. Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1065. 10.1037/a0035669
  37. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13). 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  38. Levisen, C. (2019). Biases we live by: Anglocentrism in linguistics and cognitive sciences. Language Sciences, 76, 101173. 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.05.010
  39. Li, Y., Breithaupt, F., Hills, T., Lin, Z., Chen, Y., Siew, C. S. Q., & Hertwig, R. (2024). How cognitive selection affects language change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(1), e2220898120. 10.1073/pnas.2220898120
  40. Li, Z., Shi, Y., Liu, Z., Yang, F., Payani, A., Liu, N., & Du, M. (2024, December 11). Language Ranker: A Metric for Quantifying LLM Performance Across High and Low-Resource Languages. 10.48550/arXiv.2404.11553
  41. Lo, P.-C., & Lim, E.-P. (2018). On Learning Psycholinguistics Tools for English-based Creole Languages using Social Media Data. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 751760. 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622010
  42. Lynott, D., Connell, L., Brysbaert, M., Brand, J., & Carney, J. (2020). The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: Multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 52(3), 12711291. 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z
  43. Martin, C. D., Garcia, X., Potter, D., Melinger, A., & Costa, A. (2016). Holiday or Vacation? The processing of variation in vocabulary across dialects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(3), 375390. 10.1080/23273798.2015.1100750
  44. Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 4875. 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2
  45. Martínez, G., Conde, J., Reviriego, P., & Brysbaert, M. (2024). AI-generated estimates of familiarity, concreteness, valence, and arousal for over 100,000 Spanish words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17470218241306694. 10.1177/17470218241306694
  46. Martínez, G., Molero, J. D., González, S., Conde, J., Brysbaert, M., & Reviriego, P. (2024). Using large language models to estimate features of multi-word expressions: Concreteness, valence, arousal. Behavior Research Methods, 57(1), 5. 10.3758/s13428-024-02515-z
  47. Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013). CROWDSOURCING A WORD–EMOTION ASSOCIATION LEXICON. Computational Intelligence, 29(3), 436465. 10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.x
  48. New, B., Bourgin, J., Barra, J., & Pallier, C. (2024). UniPseudo: A universal pseudoword generator. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77(2), 278286. 10.1177/17470218231164373
  49. Osgood, C. E. (1964). Semantic Differential Technique in the Comparative Study of Cultures. American Anthropologist, 66(3), 171200. http://www.jstor.org/stable/669329
  50. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois press.
  51. Paivio, A. (2013). Dual coding theory, word abstractness, and emotion: A critical review of Kousta et al. (2011). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 282287. 10.1037/a0027004
  52. Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., Siakaluk, P. D., Bodner, G. E., & Pope, J. (2008). There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 161167. 10.3758/PBR.15.1.161
  53. Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 380391. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380
  54. Rubdy, R. (2001). Creative destruction: Singapore’s Speak Good English movement. World Englishes, 20(3), 341355. 10.1111/1467-971X.00219
  55. Ruiz-Gurillo, L. (2021). Disrupted vs. Sustained humor in colloquial conversations in peninsular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 162174. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.011
  56. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 499520. 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8
  57. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420428. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
  58. Siew, C. S. Q. (2024a). A comparison of word humor ratings across speakers of North American, British, and Singapore English. Memory & Cognition. 10.3758/s13421-024-01587-8
  59. Siew, C. S. Q. (2024b). Tracking Lexical Knowledge of Concepts Unique to Singapore English Among Speakers of Singapore English. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 46. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8d8595gm
  60. Siew, C. S. Q., Engelthaler, T., & Hills, T. T. (2022). Nymph piss and gravy orgies: Local and global contrast effects in relational humor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(7), 10471063. 10.1037/xlm0001120
  61. Singh, L., Cristia, A., Karasik, L. B., Rajendra, S. J., & Oakes, L. M. (2023). Diversity and representation in infant research: Barriers and bridges toward a globalized science of infant development. Infancy, 28(4), 708737. 10.1111/infa.12545
  62. Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., Imbault, C., Pérez Sánchez, M. A., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Norms of valence and arousal for 14,031 Spanish words. Behavior Research Methods, 49(1), 111123. 10.3758/s13428-015-0700-2
  63. Tan, Y.-Y. (2017). Singlish: An illegitimate conception in Singapore’s language policies? European Journal of Language Policy, 9(1), 85104. 10.3828/ejlp.2017.6
  64. Taylor, J. E., Rousselet, G. A., Scheepers, C., & Sereno, S. C. (2022). Rating norms should be calculated from cumulative link mixed effects models. Behavior Research Methods, 55(5), 21752196. 10.3758/s13428-022-01814-7
  65. Teixeira, A. S., Talaga, S., Swanson, T. J., & Stella, M. (2021). Revealing semantic and emotional structure of suicide notes with cognitive network science. Scientific Reports, 11(1, 1), 19423. 10.1038/s41598-021-98147-w
  66. Thalmayer, A. G., Toscanelli, C., & Arnett, J. J. (2021). The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American? American Psychologist, 76(1), 116129. 10.1037/amp0000622
  67. Trott, S. (2024). Can large language models help augment English psycholinguistic datasets? Behavior Research Methods, 56(6), 60826100. 10.3758/s13428-024-02337-z
  68. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). Subtlex-UK: A New and Improved Word Frequency Database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 11761190. 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
  69. Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Farrell, S. (2004). AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 192196. 10.3758/BF03206482
  70. Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 11911207. 10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
  71. Westbury, C., & Hollis, G. (2019). Wriggly, squiffy, lummox, and boobs: What makes some words funny? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(1), 97123. 10.1037/xge0000467
  72. Westbury, C., Shaoul, C., Moroschan, G., & Ramscar, M. (2016). Telling the world’s least funny jokes: On the quantification of humor as entropy. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 141156. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.09.001
  73. Wong, J. J., & Siew, C. S. Q. (2024). Preliminary Data from the Small World of Singlish Words Project: Examining Responses to Common Singlish Words. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 12(1), 3. 10.5334/jopd.108
  74. Yap, M. J., Tan, S. E., Pexman, P. M., & Hargreaves, I. S. (2011). Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 742750. 10.3758/s13423-011-0092-y
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.470 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 6, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 19, 2025
Published on: Nov 7, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Cynthia S. Q. Siew, Feria Chang, Jin Jye Wong, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.