Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks Cover

Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks

Open Access
|Feb 2026

References

  1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Ulmità & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421452). MIT Press.
  2. Allport, D. A., & Wylie, G. (1999). Task switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. M. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 273296). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198524694.003.0016
  3. Asuako, P. A., Stojan, R., Bock, O., Mack, M., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2025). Multitasking: does task-switching add to the effect of dual-tasking on everyday-like driving behavior? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 10, 5. 10.1186/s41235-025-00611-y
  4. Band, G. P. H., & van Nes, F. T. (2006). Reconfiguration and the bottleneck: Does task switching affect the refractory period effect? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 481492. 10.1080/09541440500423244
  5. Bock, O., Wechsler, K., Koch, I., & Schubert, T. (2021). Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect. Psychological Research, 85, 568576. 10.1007/s00426-019-01272-5
  6. Chinn, S. (2000). A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 31273131. 10.1002/1097-0258(20001130)19:22<;3127::AID-SIM784>3.0.CO;2-M
  7. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175191. 10.3758/BF03193146
  8. Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. Sage.
  9. Fischer, R., & Janczyk, M. (2022). Dual-task performance with simple tasks. In A. Kiesel, L. Johannsen, I. Koch, & H. Müller (Eds.), Handbook of Human Multitasking (pp. 336). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-031-04760-2_1
  10. Hirsch, P., Declerck, M., & Koch, I. (2015). Exploring the functional locus of language switching: Evidence from a PRP paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 161, 16. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.010
  11. Hirsch, P., & Koch, I. (2024). Advancing an account of hierarchical dual-task control: A focused review on abstract higher-level task representations in dual-task situations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1177/17470218241295524
  12. Hirsch, P., Koch, I., & Karbach, J. (2019). Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations. PLoS ONE, 14(8), e0220150. 10.1371/journal.pone.0220150
  13. Hirsch, P., Nolden, S., Declerck, M., & Koch, I. (2018). Common cognitive control processes underlying performance in task-switching and dual-task contexts. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 14, 6274. 10.5709/acp-0239-y
  14. Hirsch, P., Nolden, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2018). Hierarchical task organization in dual tasks: Evidence for higher level task representations. Psychological Research, 82, 759770. 10.1007/s00426-017-0851-0
  15. Hirsch, P., Roesch, C., & Koch, I. (2021). Evidence for a multicomponent hierarchical representation of dual tasks. Memory & Cognition, 49, 350363. 10.3758/s13421-020-01097-3
  16. Hirsch, P., Schwarzkopp, T., Declerk, M., Reese, S., & Koch, I. (2016). Age-related differences in task switching and task preparation: Exploring the role of task-set competition. Acta Psychologica, 170, 6673. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.008
  17. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus–response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 13681384. 10.1037//0096-1523.24.5.1368
  18. Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2020). Dual tasking from a goal perspective. Psychological Review, 127, 10791096. 10.1037/rev0000222
  19. Janczyk, M., Renas, S., & Durst, M. (2018). Identifying the locus of compatibility-based backward crosstalk: Evidence from an extended PRP paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 261276. 10.1037/xhp0000445
  20. Jentzsch, I., Leuthold, H., & Ulrich, R. (2007). Decomposing sources of response slowing in the PRP paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 610626. 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.610
  21. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching – A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849874. 10.1037/a0019842
  22. Koch, I. (2009). The role of crosstalk in dual-task performance: evidence from manipulating response-code overlap. Psychological Research, 73, 417424. 10.1007/s00426-008-0152-8
  23. Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking–An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 557583. 10.1037/bul0000144
  24. Kübler, S., Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2022). The role of working memory for task-order coordination in dual-task situations. Psychological Research, 86, 452473. 10.1007/s00426-021-01517-2
  25. Lantz, B. (2013). The large sample size fallacy. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27, 487492. 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01052.x
  26. Lien, M. C., Schweickert, R., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 692712. 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.692
  27. Liesefeld, H. R., & Janczyk, M. (2023). Same same but different: Subtle but consequential differences between two measures to linearly integrate speed and accuracy (LISAS vs. BIS). Behavior Research Methods, 55(3), 11751192. 10.3758/s13428-022-01843-2
  28. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393434. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.393
  29. Mattes, A., Tavera, F., Ophey, A., Roheger, M., Gaschler, R., & Haider, H. (2021). Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: A drift–diffusion model approach. Psychological Research, 85, 15291552. 10.1007/s00426-020-01337-w
  30. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1, 426. 10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.4
  31. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 11241140. 10.1037//0278-7393.26.5.1124
  32. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 14231442. 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423
  33. Meiran, N. (2000). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234249. 10.1007/s004269900004
  34. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 365. 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.3
  35. Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rolke, B. (2009). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 273310. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003
  36. Mittelstädt, V., Mackenzie, I. G., & Miller, J. (2022). Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48, 12791293. 10.1037/xhp0001052
  37. Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 133142. 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
  38. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 358377. 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
  39. Pashler, H. (2000). Task switching and multitask performance. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 277309). The MIT Press. 10.1002/acp.849
  40. Pashler, H., & O’Brien, S. (1993). Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 315330. 10.1037/0096-1523.19.2.315
  41. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207231. 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
  42. Strobach, T. (2023). Cognitive control and meta-control in dual-task coordination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31, 14451460. 10.3758/s13423-023-02427-7
  43. Strobach, T., Kübler, S., & Schubert, T. (2021). A gratton-like effect concerning task order in dual-task situations. Acta Psychologica, 217, 345363. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103328
  44. Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 318. 10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.3
  45. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2008). Response grouping in the psychological refractory period paradigm (PRP): Models and contamination effects. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 75121. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.06.004
  46. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601626. 10.1037/a0019791
  47. Vince, M. A., & Welford, A. T. (1967). Time taken to change the speed of a response. Nature, 213(5075), 532533. 10.1038/213532b0
  48. Worringer, B., Langner, R., Koch, I., Eickhoff, S. B., Eickhoff, C. R., & Binkofski, F. C. (2019). Common and distinct neural correlates of dual-tasking and task-switching: A meta-analytic review and a neuro-cognitive processing model of human multitasking. Brain Structure and Function, 224, 18451869. 10.1007/s00429-019-01870-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.485 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 14, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 5, 2026
Published on: Feb 5, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Patricia Hirsch, Iring Koch, Otmar Leo Bock, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.