Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Dissociation of Size and Distance Effect in Numerical Magnitude Comparison in Less Familiar Number Ranges Cover

Dissociation of Size and Distance Effect in Numerical Magnitude Comparison in Less Familiar Number Ranges

Open Access
|Feb 2026

References

  1. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433436. 10.1163/156856897X00357
  2. Brysbaert, M. (1995). Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(4), 434. 10.1037/0096-3445.124.4.434
  3. Bulthé, J., De Smedt, B., & Op de Beeck, H. P. (2018). Arithmetic skills correlate negatively with the overlap of symbolic and non-symbolic number representations in the brain. Cortex, 101, 306308. 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.008
  4. Carey, S., & Barner, D. (2019). Ontogenetic Origins of Human Integer Representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(10), 823835. 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.004
  5. Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1–2), 142. 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-N
  6. Dehaene, S. (2003). The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: A logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 145147. 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00055-X
  7. Dehaene, S. (2008). Symbols and quantities in parietal cortex: elements of a mathematical theory of number representation and manipulation. In P. Haggard, Y. Rossetti, & Y. M. Kawato (Eds.), Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition, attention, and performance (Attention and Performance Series, 22 (pp. 527574). New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 626641. 10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.626
  9. Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition, 43(1), 129. 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90030-l
  10. Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3), 487506. 10.1080/02643290244000239
  11. Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). Multivariate linear models in R. An R Companion to Applied Regression. Los Angeles: Thousand Oaks. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Booth-7/post/Can-anyone-help-me-plan-a-regression-analysis-with-multiple-dependent-variables/attachment/59d6295279197b8077987d01/AS%3A334908498169857%401456859818016/download/MultivariateModelsR.pdf
  12. Friendly, M., Monette, G., & Fox, J. (2013). Elliptical Insights: Understanding Statistical Methods through Elliptical Geometry. Statistical Science, 28(1). 10.1214/12-STS402
  13. Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455(7213), 665668. 10.1038/nature07246
  14. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1), 335346. 10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6
  15. Knops, A. (2006). On the structure and neural correlates of the numerical magnitude representation and its influence in the assessment of verbal working memory [PhD Thesis, Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2006]. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andre-Knops/publication/27559954_On_the_Structure_and_Neural_Correlates_of_the_Numerical_Magnitude_Representation_and_its_Influence_in_the_Assessment_of_Verbal_Working_Memory/links/0912f507ff9b7592a8000000/On-the-Structure-and-Neural-Correlates-of-the-Numerical-Magnitude-Representation-and-its-Influence-in-the-Assessment-of-Verbal-Working-Memory.pdf
  16. Krajcsi, A. (2017). Numerical distance and size effects dissociate in Indo-Arabic number comparison. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(3), 927934. 10.3758/s13423-016-1175-6
  17. Krajcsi, A., & Kojouharova, P. (2017). Symbolic Numerical Distance Effect Does Not Reflect the Difference between Numbers. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02013
  18. Krajcsi, A., Lengyel, G., & Kojouharova, P. (2016). The Source of the Symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1795. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01795
  19. Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition. Cognition, 88(2), 223242. 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00023-4
  20. Leibovich, T., & Ansari, D. (2016). The symbol-grounding problem in numerical cognition: A review of theory, evidence, and outstanding questions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 70(1), 1223. 10.1037/cep0000070
  21. Lyons, I. M., Ansari, D., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Symbolic estrangement: Evidence against a strong association between numerical symbols and the quantities they represent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 635. 10.1037/a0027248
  22. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215(5109), 15191520. 10.1038/2151519a0
  23. Nuerk, H.-C., & Moeller, K., & Willmes, K. (2014). Multi-digit Number Processing: overview, conceptual clarifications, and language influences. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition. Oxford Academic. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.021
  24. Nuerk, H.-C., Weger, U., & Willmes, K. (2001). Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins. Cognition, 82(1), B2533. 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00142-1
  25. Núñez, R. E. (2017). Is There Really an Evolved Capacity for Number? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(6), 409424. 10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.005
  26. Pajot, M., Sablé-Meyer, M., & Dehaene, S. (2025). The compositional nature of number concepts: Insights from number frequencies. Cognition, 263, 106213. 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106213
  27. Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Bihan, D. L., & Dehaene, S. (2007). A Magnitude Code Common to Numerosities and Number Symbols in Human Intraparietal Cortex. Neuron, 53(2), 293305. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.022
  28. Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group. Science, 306(5695), 499503. 10.1126/science.1102085
  29. Rosenberg-Lee, M., Varma, S., Cole, M. W., & Abreu-Mendoza, R. A. (2023). Competing numerical magnitude codes in decimal comparison: Whole number and rational number distance both impact performance. Cognition, 241, 105608. 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105608
  30. Roth, L., Jordan, V., Schwarz, S., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C., van Dijck, J.-P., & Cipora, K. (2024). Don’t SNARC me now! Intraindividual variability of cognitive phenomena—Insights from the Ironman paradigm. Cognition, 248, 105781. 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105781
  31. R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
  32. Wilkey, E. D., Conrad, B. N., Yeo, D. J., & Price, G. R. (2020). Shared Numerosity Representations Across Formats and Tasks Revealed with 7 Tesla fMRI: Decoding, Generalization, and Individual Differences in Behavior. Cerebral Cortex Communications, 1(1), tgaa038. 10.1093/texcom/tgaa038
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.486 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 9, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 22, 2026
Published on: Feb 6, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Alexis Garsmeur, Roxane Morand, André Knops, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.