Cognitive Measures and Performance on the Antisaccade Eye Movement Task

N	143
Age (Mean/SD)	42.51 (10.06)
Females/Males (N)	78/65
IQ (Mean/SD)	106.25 (14.37)
TMT-B¹ (Mean/SD)	62.59 (21.95)
WCST² (Mean/SD)	9.87 (8.39)
Stroop (Mean/SD)	24.42 (8.72)
LFL³ (Mean/SD)	15.50 (4.74)
CFL⁴ (Mean/SD)	23.92 (5.82)
SWM⁵ (Mean/SD)	13.49 (12.01)
RVIP⁶ (Mean/SD)	0.92 (0.05)
AS⁷ Gain (Mean/SD)	–110.66 (28.76)
AS Latency (Mean/SD)	291.01 (49.16)
AS Spatial Error (Mean/SD)	41.73 (16.60)
AS Error Rate (Mean/SD)	35.57 (20.25)

[i] Notes: ¹Trail Making Task Version B, ²Wisconsin Card Sorting Task, ³Letter Fluency Task, ⁴Category Fluency Task, ⁵Spatial Working Memory Task, ⁶Rapid Visual Information Task, ⁷Antisaccade.

Table 2

Correlations between age, sex, cognitive and antisaccade measurements.

Variables		1		2		3		4		5		6		7		8		9		10		11		12	13
1	Age
2	Sex	.14
3	IQ	–.03		–.22	**
4	TMT-B¹	.19	*	–.12		–.50	**
5	WCST²	.07		.24	**	–.45	**	.33	**
6	Stroop	.22	*	–.06		–.31	**	.35	**	.08
7	LFL³	–.09		–.12		.49	**	–.44	**	–.22	*	–.28	**
8	CFL⁴	–.11		–.12		.41	**	–.33	**	–.29	**	–.25	**	.54	**
9	SWM⁵	.35	**	.27	**	–.33	**	.28	**	.30	**	.23	**	–.29	**	–.26	**
10	RVIP⁶	–.15		.01		.38	**	–.43	**	–.28	**	–.44	**	.30	**	.27	**	–.31	**
11	AS⁷ Gain	–.02		–.17	*	.01		–.01		–.02		–.08		.04		.01		–.04		.02
12	AS Latency	.24	**	.09		–.16		.28	**	.20	*	.18	*	–.22	**	–.13		.24	**	–.15		.17	*
13	AS Spatial Error	.18	*	.18	*	–.05		–.01		.03		.13		–.04		–.05		.10		–.09		–.69	**	–.14
14	AS Error Rate	.09		.13		–.17	*	.15		.23	**	.19	*	–.13		–.08		.09		–.30	**	–.14		.16	.19	*

Table 3

Best models, posterior probabilities for the best models and inclusion probabilities for each predictor.

Dependent variable	Predictor	Best model	Pr(β ≠ 0\|Y)	Posterior model probability of best model
AS⁷ Gain	Intercept	•	1.000	0.276
	Age	•	1.000
	Sex	•	1.000
	IQ	•	1.000
	TMT-B¹		0.176
	WCST²		0.146
	Stroop		0.284
	LFL³		0.155
	CFL⁴		0.146
	SWM⁵		0.145
	RVIP⁶		0.154
AS Spatial Error	Intercept	•	1.000	0.284
	Age	•	1.000
	Sex	•	1.000
	IQ	•	1.000
	TMT-B		0.164
	WCST		0.151
	Stroop		0.264
	LFL		0.144
	CFL		0.144
	SWM		0.144
	RVIP		0.185
AS Latency	Intercept	•	1.000	0.188
	Age	•	1.000
	Sex	•	1.000
	IQ	•	1.000
	TMT-B	•	0.725
	WCST		0.265
	Stroop		0.211
	LFL		0.278
	CFL		0.155
	SWM		0.253
	RVIP		0.157
AS Error Rate	Intercept	•	1.000	0.249
	Age	•	1.000
	Sex	•	1.000
	IQ	•	1.000
	TMT-B		0.160
	WCST		0.351
	Stroop		0.219
	LFL		0.156
	CFL		0.168
	SWM		0.205
	RVIP	•	0.934

[i] Notes: Bayesian Model Averaging was used to determine inclusion probabilities for the predictors. Thus, regression coefficient estimates are not included. For inference on effect sizes, the estimates for the stepwise regression are reported in the text. ¹Trail Making Task Version B, ²Wisconsin Card Sorting Task, ³Letter Fluency Task, ⁴Category Fluency Task, ⁵Spatial Working Memory Task, ⁶Rapid Visual Information Task, ⁷Antisaccade.

References

Authors

Metrics

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.52 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Submitted on: Mar 19, 2018

Accepted on: Dec 20, 2018

Published on: Jan 24, 2019

Published by: Ubiquity Press

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

Keywords:

© 2019 B. B. Magnusdottir, E. Faiola, C. Harms, E. Sigurdsson, U. Ettinger, H. M. Haraldsson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 2 (2019): Issue 1