The Effect of Stimulus-Response Compatibility on the Association of Fluid Intelligence and Working Memory with Choice Reaction Times
References
- Amthauer, R., Brocke, B., Liepmann, D., & Beauducel, A. (2001). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R [Intelligence Structure Test 2000 R]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
- Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological bulletin, 107, 238–246. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
- Danthiir, V., Roberts, R. D., Schulze, R., & Wilhelm, O. (2005).
Mental speed: On frameworks, paradigms, and a platform for the future . In O. Wilhelm, & R. W. Engle (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence, (pp. 27–46). London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781452233529.n3 - Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999).
Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex . In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (pp. 102–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.007 - Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954). S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483–492. DOI: 10.1037/h0054967
- Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210. DOI: 10.1037/h0062827
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
- Jäger, A. O., Süß, H.-M., & Beauducel, A. (1997). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur - Test. Form 4. [Berlin Intelligence Structure Test: Form 4]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
- Jensen, A. R. (1993). Spearman’s g: Links between psychometrics and biology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 702, 103–129. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb17244.x
- Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 132, 47–70. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47
- Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. E. (2004). The generality of working-memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuo-spatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189
- Keye, D., Wilhelm, O., Oberauer, K., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2009). Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: Testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Erikson flanker task. Psychological Research, 73, 762–776. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0188-9
- Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility – a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
- MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
- Meier, M. E., & Kane, M. J. (2015). Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1849–1872. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000147
- Meiran, N., Pereg, M., Givon, E., Danieli, G., & Shahar, N. (2016). The role of working memory in rapid instructed task learning and intention-based reflexivity: An individual differences examination. Neuropsychologia, 90, 180–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.037
- Meiran, N., & Shahar, N. (2018). Working memory involvement in reaction time and its contribution to fluid intelligence: An examination of individual differences in reaction-time distributions. Intelligence, 69, 176–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2018.06.004
- Oberauer, K. (2005). Binding and inhibition in working memory: Individual and age differences in short-term recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 368–287. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.368
- Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W. (2000). Working memory capacity: Facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017–1045. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00251-2
- Raven, J. C. (1958). Advanced progressive matrices. (2nd ed.). London: Lewis.
- R Core Team. (2017).
R: A language and environment for statistical computing . Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. - Roberts, R. D., & Stankov, L. (2001). Omnibus Screening Protocol. Sydney: E-ntelligent Testing Products.
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
- Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4–27. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.125.1.4
- Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
- Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, G. A. (2012). Variation in working memory capacity and cognitive control: Goal maintenance and micro-adjustments of control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 326–355. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.597865
- Wilhelm, O. (2005).
Measuring reasoning ability . In O. Wilhelm & R. W. Engle (Eds.), Understanding and Measuring Intelligence (pp. 373–392). London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781452233529.n21 - Wilhelm, O., & Oberauer, K. (2006). Why are reasoning ability and working memory capacity related to mental speed? An investigation of stimulus–response compatibility in choice reaction time tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 18–50. DOI: 10.1080/09541440500215921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.66 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 30, 2018
Accepted on: May 6, 2019
Published on: Jun 11, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2019 Gizem Hülür, Doris Keye-Ehing, Klaus Oberauer, Oliver Wilhelm, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.