Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On the Assimilation of Instructions: Stimulus-response Associations are Implemented but not Stimulus-task Associations Cover

On the Assimilation of Instructions: Stimulus-response Associations are Implemented but not Stimulus-task Associations

Open Access
|Jul 2019

References

  1. Amso, D., Haas, S., McShane, L., & Badre, D. (2014). Working memory updating and the development of rule-guided behavior. Cognition, 133, 201210. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.012
  2. Augustinova, M., & Ferrand, L. (2014). Automaticity of word reading: Evidence from the semantic Stroop paradigm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 343348. DOI: 10.1177/0963721414540169
  3. Augustinova, M., Almeida, E., Clarys, D., Ferrand, L., Izaute, M., Jalenques, I., Silvert, L., et al. (2016). Que mesure l’interférence Stroop? Quand et comment? Arguments méthodologiques et théoriques en faveur d’un changement de pratiques dans sa mesure. L’Année psychologique, 116, 4566. DOI: 10.4074/S000350331500024X
  4. Bhandari, A., Badre, D., & Frank, M. J. (2017). Learning cognitive control. In T. Egner (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of cognitive control, 376391, Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118920497.ch21
  5. Bhandari, A., & Duncan, J. (2014). Goal neglect and knowledge chunking in the construction of novel behaviour. Cognition, 130, 1130. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.013
  6. Braem, S., Liefooghe, B., De Houwer, J., Brass, M., & Abrahamse, E. L. (2017). There are limits to the effects of task instructions: Making the automatic effects of task instructions context-specific takes practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 394403. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000310
  7. Brass, M., Liefooghe, B., Braem, S., & De Houwer, J. (2017). Following new task instructions: Evidence for a dissociation between knowing and doing. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 1628. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.012
  8. Brass, M., Wenke, D., Spengler, S., & Waszak, F. (2009). Neural correlates of overcoming interference from instructed and implemented stimulus–response associations. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 17661772. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5259-08.2009
  9. Chevalier, N. (2015). The development of executive function: Toward more optimal coordination of control with age. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 239244. DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12138
  10. Cohen-Kdoshay, O., & Meiran, N. (2007). The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: Evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 11401154.
  11. Cohen-Kdoshay, O., & Meiran, N. (2009). The representation of instructions operates like a prepared reflex: Flanker compatibility effects found in first trial following S–R instructions. Experimental Psychology, 56, 128133. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.2.128
  12. Cole, M. W., Laurent, P., & Stocco, A. (2013). Rapid instructed task learning: A new window into the human brain’s unique capacity for flexible cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 122. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-012-0125-7
  13. Dreisbach, G., Goschke, T., & Haider, H. (2007). The role of task rules and stimulus–response mappings in the task switching paradigm. Psychological Research, 71, 383392. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0041-3
  14. Dumontheil, I., Roggeman, C., Ziermans, T., Peyrard-Janvid, M., Matsson, H., Kere, J., & Klingberg, T. (2011). Influence of the COMT genotype on working memory and brain activity changes during development. Biological psychiatry, 70, 222229. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.02.027
  15. Duncan, J., Emslie, H., Williams, P., Johnson, R., & Freer, C. (1996). Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goal-directed behavior. Cognitive psychology, 30, 257303. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0008
  16. Duncan, J., Parr, A., Woolgar, A., Thompson, R., Bright, P., Cox, S., Bishop, S., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (2008). Goal neglect and Spearman’s g: Competing parts of a complex task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 131148. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.131
  17. Everaert, T., Theeuwes, M., Liefooghe, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Automatic motor activation by mere instruction. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 13001309. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0294-7
  18. Forrest, C. L., Monsell, S., & McLaren, I. P. (2014). Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 10021024. DOI: 10.1037/a0035981
  19. Fagot, C. (1994). Chronometric investigations of task switching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
  20. Hartstra, E., Waszak, F., & Brass, M. (2012). The implementation of verbal instructions: dissociating motor preparation from the formation of stimulus–response associations. Neuroimage, 63, 11431153. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.003
  21. Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., & Mewhort, D. J. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340347. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.340
  22. Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. N. (2009). Bindings between stimuli and multiple response codes dominate long-lag repetition priming in speeded classification tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 757779. DOI: 10.1037/a0015262
  23. Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. N. (2011). Stimulus–response bindings code both abstract and specific representations of stimuli: Evidence from a classification priming design that reverses multiple levels of response representation. Memory & Cognition, 39, 14571471. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0118-8
  24. Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. N. (2012). Incongruent abstract stimulus–response bindings result in response interference: fMRI and EEG evidence from visual object classification priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 760773. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00163
  25. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
  26. Kalanthroff, E., Davelaar, E. J., Henik, A., Goldfarb, L., & Usher, M. (2018). Task conflict and proactive control: A computational theory of the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 125, 5982. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000083
  27. Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 643650. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
  28. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849874. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
  29. Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 557583. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000144
  30. Liefooghe, B., & De Houwer, J. (2018). Automatic effects of instructions do not require the intention to execute these instructions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30, 108121. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2017.1365871
  31. Liefooghe, B., De Houwer, J., & Wenke, D. (2013). Instruction-based response activation depends on task preparation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 481487. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0374-7
  32. Liefooghe, B., Wenke, D., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 38, 13251335. DOI: 10.1037/a0028148
  33. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575599. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575
  34. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological bulletin, 109, 163203. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
  35. Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2009). Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 798817. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.798
  36. Meiran, N., & Cohen-Kdoshay, O. (2012). Working memory load but not multitasking eliminates the prepared reflex: Further evidence from the adapted flanker paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 139, 309313. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.008
  37. Meiran, N., Cole, M. W., & Braver, T. S. (2012). When planning results in loss of control: Intention-based reflexivity and working-memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 104. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00104
  38. Meiran, N., Liefooghe, B., & De Houwer, J. (2017). Powerful instructions: Automaticity without practice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 509514. DOI: 10.1177/0963721417711638
  39. Meiran, N., Pereg, M., Kessler, Y., Cole, M. W., & Braver, T. S. (2015). The power of instructions: Proactive configuration of stimulus–response translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 768786. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000063
  40. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134140. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
  41. Monsell, S., Taylor, T. J., & Murphy, K. (2001). Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? Memory & Cognition, 29, 137151. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195748
  42. Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Jamil, T. (2015). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. R package version 0.9, 9, 2014.
  43. Moutsopoulou, K., Yang, Q., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (2015). Stimulus–classification and stimulus–action associations: Effects of repetition learning and durability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 17441757. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.984232
  44. Oberauer, K. (2009). Design for a working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 45100. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51002-X
  45. Pfeuffer, C. U., Hosp, T., Kimmig, E., Moutsopoulou, K., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2018b). Defining stimulus representation in stimulus–response associations formed on the basis of task execution and verbal codes. Psychological Research, 82, 744758. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0861-y
  46. Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Pfister, R., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2017). The power of words: On item-specific stimulus–response associations formed in the absence of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 328347. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000317
  47. Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2018a). Multiple priming instances increase the impact of practice-based but not verbal code-based stimulus-response associations. Acta Psychologica, 184, 100109. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.001
  48. Pratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Feng, C. (2010). Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 20132025. DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.7.2013
  49. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59108. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
  50. Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2017). Distributional analysis of semantic interference in picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 782792. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1165264
  51. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207231. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
  52. Rubin, O., & Koch, I. (2006). Exogenous influences on task set activation in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 10331046. DOI: 10.1080/02724980543000105
  53. Ruge, H., & Wolfensteller, U. (2010). Rapid formation of pragmatic rule representations in the human brain during instruction-based learning. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 16561667. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp228
  54. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343367. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343
  55. Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2009). Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 13981412. DOI: 10.1037/a0016467
  56. Stevens, M., Lammertyn, J., Verbruggen, F., & Vandierendonck, A. (2006). Tscope: AC library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 280286. DOI: 10.3758/BF03192779
  57. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643662. DOI: 10.1037/h0054651
  58. Theeuwes, M., De Houwer, J., Eder, A., & Liefooghe, B. (2015). Congruency effects on the basis of instructed response-effect contingencies. Acta Psychologica, 158, 4350. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.04.002
  59. Theeuwes, M., Liefooghe, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Eliminating the Simon effect by instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 40, 14701480. DOI: 10.1037/a0036913
  60. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601626. DOI: 10.1037/a0019791
  61. Verbruggen, F., McLaren, R., Pereg, M., & Meiran, N. (2018). Structure and Implementation of Novel Task Rules: A Cross-Sectional Developmental Study. Psychological Science, 29, 11131125. DOI: 10.1177/0956797618755322
  62. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus–task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361413. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0
  63. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2004). Semantic generalization of stimulus-task bindings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 10271033. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196732
  64. Waszak, F., Wenke, D., & Brass, M. (2008). Cross-talk of instructed and applied arbitrary visuomotor mappings. Acta Psychologica, 127, 3035. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.12.005
  65. Wenke, D., De Houwer, J., De Winne, J., & Liefooghe, B. (2015). Learning through instructions vs. learning through practice: Flanker congruency effects from instructed and applied S-R mappings. Psychological Research, 79, 899912. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0621-1
  66. Wenke, D., Gaschler, R., & Nattkemper, D. (2007). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research, 71, 92106. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0038-y
  67. Wenke, D., Gaschler, R., Nattkemper, D., & Frensch, P. A. (2009). Strategic influences on implementing instructions for future actions. Psychological Research, 73, 587601. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0239-x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.78 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 21, 2018
Accepted on: Jul 15, 2019
Published on: Jul 31, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Baptist Liefooghe, Frederick Verbruggen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.