Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
VIFECO: An Open-Source Software for Counting Features on a Video Cover

VIFECO: An Open-Source Software for Counting Features on a Video

Open Access
|May 2021

References

  1. Pink S. Doing visual ethnography. 2013. Sage.
  2. Luvaas B. The Camera and the Anthropologist: Reflections on Photographic Agency. Visual Anthropology, 2019; 32(1): 7696. DOI: 10.1080/08949468.2019.1568115
  3. Kindon S. Participatory video in geographic research: a feminist practice of looking? Area, 2003; 35(2): 142153. DOI: 10.1111/1475-4762.00236
  4. Garrett BL. Videographic geographies: Using digital video for geographic research. Progress in Human Geography, 2011; 35(4): 521541. DOI: 10.1177/0309132510388337
  5. Büscher M, Urry J. Mobile methods and the empirical. European Journal of Social Theory, 2009; 12(1): 99116. DOI: 10.1177/1368431008099642
  6. Hein JR, Evans J, Jones P. Mobile methodologies: Theory, technology and practice. Geography Compass, 2008; 2(5): 12661285. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00139.x
  7. Tutenel P, Ramaekers S, Heylighen A. Conversations between procedural and situated ethics: Learning from video research with children in a cancer care ward. The Design Journal, 2019; 22(sup1): 641654. DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2019.1595444
  8. Mengis J, Nicolini D, Gorli M. The video production of space: How different recording practices matter. Organizational Research Methods, 2018; 21(2): 288315. DOI: 10.1177/1094428116669819
  9. Lynch H, Stanley M. Beyond words: Using qualitative video methods for researching occupation with young children. OTJR: occupation, participation and health, 2018; 38(1): 5666. DOI: 10.1177/1539449217718504
  10. Caldwell K, Atwal A. Non-participant observation: using video tapes to collect data in nursing research. Nurse researcher, 2005; 13(2). DOI: 10.7748/nr.13.2.42.s6
  11. Chapman BJ, MacLAURIN T, Powell DA. Video Observation and Data Coding Methods. Food Protection Trends, 2013; 33(3): 146156.
  12. Bélisle F, et al. Optimized video tracking for automated vehicle turning movement counts. Transportation Research Record, 2017; 2645(1): 104112. DOI: 10.3141/2645-12
  13. Saunier N, Sayed T. Automated analysis of road safety with video data. Transportation Research Record, 2007; 2019(1): 5764. DOI: 10.3141/2019-08
  14. Jackson S, et al. Flexible, mobile video camera system and open source video analysis software for road safety and behavioral analysis. Transportation research record, 2013; 2365(1): 9098. DOI: 10.3141/2365-12
  15. Ismail K, et al. Automated analysis of pedestrian–vehicle conflicts using video data. Transportation research record, 2009; 2140(1): 4454. DOI: 10.3141/2140-05
  16. Struthers DP, et al. Action cameras: bringing aquatic and fisheries research into view. Fisheries, 2015; 40(10): 502512. DOI: 10.1080/03632415.2015.1082472
  17. de la Rosa CA. An inexpensive and open-source method to study large terrestrial animal diet and behaviour using time-lapse video and GPS. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2019; 10(5): 615625. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13146
  18. LeBaron C, et al. An introduction to video methods in organizational research. 2018; Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
  19. Jarrett M, Liu F. “Zooming with” a participatory approach to the use of video ethnography in organizational studies. Organizational Research Methods, 2018; 21(2): 366385. DOI: 10.1177/1094428116656238
  20. Badrinarayanan V, Kendall A, Cipolla R. Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2017; 39(12): 24812495. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615
  21. Vondrick C, Patterson D, Ramanan D. Efficiently scaling up crowdsourced video annotation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2013; 101(1): 184204. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-012-0564-1
  22. Bradski G. The opencv library. Dr Dobb’s J. Software Tools, 2000; 25: 120125.
  23. Sobral A, Bouwmans T. Bgs library: A library framework for algorithm’s evaluation in foreground/background segmentation. In T. Bouwmans, et al., (Eds.), Background Modeling and Foreground Detection for Video Surveillance. 2014, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
  24. Sobral A. Vehicle Detection, Tracking and Counting. 2014; Available from: https://github.com/andrewssobral/simple_vehicle_counting.
  25. Sobral A. Vehicle Detection by Haar Cascades with OpenCV. Available from: https://github.com/andrewssobral/vehicle_detection_haarcascades.
  26. Bouvie C, et al. Tracking and counting vehicles in traffic video sequences using particle filtering. In 2013 IEEE international instrumentation and measurement technology conference (I2MTC). 2013. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/I2MTC.2013.6555527
  27. Mithun NC, Rashid NU, Rahman SM, Detection and classification of vehicles from video using multiple time-spatial images. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2012; 13(3): 12151225. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2012.2186128
  28. Ismail K, Sayed T, Saunier N. Automated analysis of pedestrian-vehicle: Conflicts context for before-and-after studies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010; 2198: 5264. DOI: 10.3141/2198-07
  29. Saunier N, Sayed T, Ismail K. Large-scale automated analysis of vehicle interactions and collisions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010; 2147: 4250. DOI: 10.3141/2147-06
  30. Buch N, Orwell J, Velastin SA. 3D extended histogram of oriented gradients (3DHOG) for classification of road users in urban scenes. 2009. DOI: 10.5244/C.23.15
  31. Messelodi S, Modena CM, Zanin M. A computer vision system for the detection and classification of vehicles at urban road intersections. Pattern analysis and applications, 2005; 8(1–2): 1731. DOI: 10.1007/s10044-004-0239-9
  32. Buch N, Velastin SA, Orwell J. A review of computer vision techniques for the analysis of urban traffic. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2011; 12(3): 920939. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2011.2119372
  33. Yang CD, Najm WG. Examining driver behavior using data gathered from red light photo enforcement cameras. Journal of safety research, 2007; 38(3): 311321. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.01.008
  34. Hediyeh H, et al. Pedestrian gait analysis using automated computer vision techniques. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 2014; 10(3): 214232. DOI: 10.1080/18128602.2012.727498
  35. Ismail K, Sayed T, Saunier N. Camera calibration for urban traffic scenes: Practical issues and a robust approach. In 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. 2010.
  36. Zangenehpour S, Miranda-Moreno LF, Saunier N. Automated classification based on video data at intersections with heavy pedestrian and bicycle traffic: Methodology and application. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 2015; 56: 161176. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.04.003
  37. Layka V, et al. Introduction to Griffon. In Beginning Groovy, Grails and Griffon. 2013, Springer. 305331. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4302-4807-1_13
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.300 | Journal eISSN: 2049-9647
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 20, 2019
Accepted on: Apr 29, 2021
Published on: May 7, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Philippe Apparicio, David Maignan, Jérémy Gelb, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.