Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Particle Image Velocimetry for MATLAB: Accuracy and enhanced algorithms in PIVlab Cover

Particle Image Velocimetry for MATLAB: Accuracy and enhanced algorithms in PIVlab

Open Access
|May 2021

References

  1. Adrian RJ. Scattering particle characteristics and their effect on pulsed laser measurements of fluid flow: Speckle velocimetry vs particle image velocimetry. Applied Optics. 1984; 23: 16901691. DOI: 10.1364/AO.23.001690
  2. Willert CE, Gharib M. Digital particle image velocimetry. Experiments in Fluids. 1991; 10: 181193. DOI: 10.1007/BF00190388
  3. Keane R, Adrian R. Theory of cross-correlation analysis of piv images. Applied Scientific Research. 1992; 49: 191215. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2690-8
  4. Stamhuis EJ, Videler JJ. Quantitative flow analysis around aquatic animals using laser sheet particle image velocimetry. Journal of Experimental Biology. 1995; 198: 283294. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.198.2.283
  5. Raffel M, Willert C, Wereley S, Kompenhans J. Particle Image Velocimetry. Springer 2 edn. 2007. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72308-0
  6. Booth-Gauthier E, Alcoser T, Yang G, Dahl K. Force-induced changes in subnuclear movement and rheology. Biophysical Journal. 2012; 103: 24232431. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.10.039
  7. Sarno L, Carravetta A, Tai Y-C, Martino R, Papa MN, Kuo CY. Measuring the velocity fields of granular flows – employment of a multipass two-dimensional particle image velocimetry (2d-piv) approach. Advanced Powder Technology. 2018; 29: 31073123. DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2018.08.014
  8. Voorneveld J, Kruizinga P, Vos HJ, Gijsen FJ, Jebbink EG, van der Steen AF, de Jong N, Bosch JG. Native blood speckle vs ultrasound contrast agent for particle image velocimetry with ultrafast ultrasound – in vitro experiments in 2016. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). 2016; 14. DOI: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2016.7728614
  9. OpenPIV http://www.openpiv.net/.
  10. Fluere https://www.softpedia.com/get/science-cad/fluere.shtml.
  11. Fluidimage https://pypi.org/project/fluidimage/.
  12. mpiv https://de.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/2411-mpiv.
  13. JPIV https://eguvep.github.io/jpiv/.
  14. UVMAT http://servforge.legi.grenoble-inp.fr/projects/soft-uvmat.
  15. Thielicke W, Stamhuis E. Pivlab – towards user-friendly, affordable and accurate digital particle image velocimetry in matlab Journal of Open Research Software. 2014; 2. DOI: 10.5334/jors.bl
  16. Thielicke W. The Flapping Flight of Birds – Analysis and Application Ph.D. thesis Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 2014. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18656.94728
  17. Santiago JG, Wereley ST, Meinhart CD, Beebe DJ, Adrian RJ. A particle image velocimetry system for microfluidics. Experiments in Fluids. 1998; 25: 316319. DOI: 10.1007/s003480050235
  18. Delnoij E, Westerweel J, Deen NN, Kuipers JH, van Wpm Wim Swaaij. Ensemble correlation piv applied to bubble plumes rising in a bubble column. Chemical Engineering Science. 1999; 54: 51595171. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00233-X
  19. Hart DP. Piv error correction. Experiments in Fluids. 2000; 29: 1322. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-56963-0
  20. Nobach H, Damaschke N, Tropea C. High-precision sub-pixel interpolation in particle image velocimetry image processing. Experiments in Fluids. 2005; 39: 299304. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-005-0999-z
  21. Nobach H, Bodenschatz E. Limitations of accuracy in piv due to individual variations of particle image intensities. Experiments in Fluids. 2009; 47: 2738. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-009-0627-4
  22. Lourenco L, Krothapalli A. On the accuracy of velocity and vorticity measurements with piv. Experiments in Fluids. 1995; 18: 421428. DOI: 10.1007/BF00208464
  23. Wu K-T, Hishamunda JB, Chen DTN, DeCamp SJ, Chang Y-W, Fernández-Nieves A, Fraden S, Dogic Z. Transition from turbulent to coherent flows in confined three-dimensional active fluids. Science. 2017; 355. DOI: 10.1126/science.aal1979
  24. Saw TB, Doostmohammadi A, Nier V, Kocgozlu L, Thampi S, Toyama Y, Marcq P, Lim CT, Yeomans JM, Ladoux B. Topological defects in epithelia govern cell death and extrusion. Nature. 2017; 544: 212216. DOI: 10.1038/nature21718
  25. Mori D, Ishigami G. Excavation model of soil sampling device based on particle image velocimetry. Journal of Terramechanics. 2015; 62: 1929. DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2015.02.001
  26. Gaudel N, de Richter SK, Louvet N, Jenny M, Skali-Lami S. Granular avalanches down inclined and vibrated planes. Physical Review E. 2016; 94: 32904. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032904
  27. Shimobayashi SF, Tsudome M, Kurimura T. Suppression of the coffee-ring effect by sugar-assisted depinning of contact line. Scientific Reports. 2018; 8: 17769. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35998-w
  28. Comiskey PM, Yarin A, Attinger D. High-speed video analysis of forward and backward spattered blood droplets. Forensic Science International. 2017; 276: 134141. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.04.016
  29. Penn R, Maurer M, Michalec F-G, Scheidegger A, Zhou J, Holzner M. Quantifying physical disintegration of faeces in sewers: Stochastic model and flow reactor experiments. Water Research. 2019; 152: 159170. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.037
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.334 | Journal eISSN: 2049-9647
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 13, 2020
Accepted on: May 13, 2021
Published on: May 31, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 William Thielicke, René Sonntag, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.