Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Epidemiological Agent-Based Modelling Software (Epiabm) Cover

References

  1. Adam D. Special report: The simulations driving the world’s response to COVID-19. Nature. Apr. 2020; 580(7803): 316–318. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-01003-6
  2. Birrell P, et al. Real-time nowcasting and forecasting of COVID-19 dynamics in England: the first wave. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2021; 376(1829). DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0279
  3. Crick T, Hall BA, Ishtiaq S. Reproducibility in Research: Systems, Infrastructure, Culture. Journal of Open Research Software. Nov. 2017; 5. DOI: 10.5334/jors.73
  4. Danon L, et al. A spatial model of COVID-19 transmission in England and Wales: early spread, peak timing and the impact of seasonality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. May 2021; 376(1829). DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0272
  5. Davies NG, et al. Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study. The Lancet Public Health. 2020; 5(7): e375e385. ISSN: 2468–2667. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30133-X
  6. Eglen SJ. CODECHECK certificate 2020-010. en (2020). DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.3865490
  7. Ferguson NM, et al. Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand; 2020. DOI: 10.25561/77482
  8. Ferguson NM, Nedjati Gilani G, Laydon, D. COVID-19 CovidSim microsimulation model. Computer Software. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Apr. 2020.
  9. Ferguson NM, et al. Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic. Nature. Apr. 2006. 442(7101): 448452. DOI: 10.1038/nature04795
  10. He S, Peng Y, Sun K. SEIR modeling of the COVID-19 and its dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics. June 2020; 101(3): 16671680. DOI: 10.1007/s11071-020-05743-y
  11. Hunter E, Mac Mamee B, Kelleher JD. A Comparison of Agent-Based Models and Equation Based Models for Infectious Disease Epidemiology; 2018. DOI: 10.18564/jasss.3414
  12. Keeling MJ, et al. Predictions of COVID-19 dynamics in the UK: Shortterm forecasting and analysis of potential exit strategies. PLOS Computational Biology. Jan. 2021. 17(1): 120. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008619
  13. Lyra W, et al. COVID-19 pandemics modeling with modified determinist SEIR, social distancing, and age stratification. The effect of vertical confinement and release in Brazil. PLOS ONE. Sept. 2020. 15(9): e0237627, Samy AM (ed.). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237627
  14. Shen C, Taleb NN, Bar-Yam Y. Review of Ferguson et al. ‘Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions…’ New England Complex Systems Institute; Mar. 2020.
  15. Stodden V, Miguez S. Best Practices for Computational Science: Software Infrastructure and Environments for Reproducible and Extensible Research. Journal of Open Research Software. July 2014; 2(1). DOI: 10.5334/jors.ay
  16. Wooldridge M. The Software that Led to the Lockdown. July 2020.
  17. Wu JT, Cowling BJ. The use of mathematical models to inform influenza pandemic preparedness and response. Experimental Biology and Medicine. Aug. 2011; 236(8): 955961. DOI: 10.1258/ebm.2010.010271
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.449 | Journal eISSN: 2049-9647
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 24, 2022
Accepted on: Feb 2, 2024
Published on: Mar 5, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Kit Gallagher, Ioana Bouros, Nicholas Fan, Elizabeth Hayman, Luke Heirene, Patricia Lamirande, Annabelle Lemenuel-Diot, Ben Lambert, David Gavaghan, Richard Creswell, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.