Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Optical Flow Algorithm with Automatic Parameter Adjustment for Fluid Velocimetry Cover

An Optical Flow Algorithm with Automatic Parameter Adjustment for Fluid Velocimetry

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Cai S, Zhou S, Xu C, Gao Q. Dense motion estimation of particle images via a convolutional neural network. Experiments in Fluids. 2019;60(73). DOI: 10.1007/s00348-019-2717-2
  2. Calvetti D, Somersalo E. Bayesian Scientific Computing, Vol. 215, Springer Nature; 2023a. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-23824-6
  3. Calvetti D, Somersalo E. Hierarchical models and bayesian sparsity. In: Bayesian Scientific Computing. Springer; 2023b. pp. 183210. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-23824-6_10
  4. Carlier J, Wieneke B. Report 1 on production and diffusion of fluid mechanics images and data. Technical report. Fluid image analysis and description (FLUID) Project; 2005. http://fluid.irisa.fr/data-eng.htm
  5. Corpetti T, Heitz D, Arroyo G, Mémin E, Santa-Cruz A. Fluid experimental flow estimation based on an optical-flow scheme. Experiments in Fluids. 2006;40(1):8097. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-005-0048-y
  6. Corpetti T, Mémin E, Pérez P. Dense estimation of fluid flows. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 2002;24(3):365380. DOI: 10.1109/34.990137
  7. Dérian P. Wavelets and fluid motion estimation. PhD thesis. Université de Rennes; 2012.
  8. Dérian P, Almar R. Wavelet-based optical flow estimation of instant surface currents from shore-based and UAV videos. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2017;55(10):57905797. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2714202
  9. Dérian P, Héas P, Herzet C, Mémin E. Wavelets and optical flow motion estimation. Numerical Mathematics: Theory, Methods and Applications. 2013;6:116137. DOI: 10.4208/nmtma.2013.mssvm07
  10. Heitz D, Mémin E, Schnörr C. Variational fluid flow measurements from image sequences: synopsis and perspectives. Experiments in Fluids. 2010;48:369393. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-009-0778-3
  11. Horn BKP, Schunck BG. Determining optical flow. Artificial Intelligence. 1981;17:185203. DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(81)90024-2
  12. Jassal GR. On High Spatial Resolution Velocimetry in Fluid Flows Using Optical Flow. PhD thesis. Case Western Reserve University; 2025.
  13. Jassal GR, Dobrosotskaya J, Schmidt BE. Optical flow velocimetry using a quasi-optimal basis with implicit regularization. In: AIAA Aviation 2022 Forum; 2022. DOI: 10.2514/6.2022-3336
  14. Jassal GR, Schmidt BE. Accurate near-wall measurements in wall bounded flows with optical flow velocimetry via an explicit no-slip boundary condition. Measurement Science and Technology. 2023a;34(12):125303. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/acf872
  15. Jassal GR, Schmidt BE. Accurate near wall measurements in wall bounded flows with wOFV via an explicit no-slip boundary condition. In: AIAA Scitech 2023 Forum; 2023b. DOI: 10.2514/6.2023-2444
  16. Jassal GR, Schmidt BE. Optical flow velocimetry using a quasi-optimal basis with explicit viscosity-like regularization. In: AIAA Scitech 2024 Forum; 2024a. DOI: 10.2514/6.2024-2664
  17. Jassal GR, Schmidt BE. Synthetic particle image datasets for benchmarking piv processing algorithms; 2024b. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/dtrsj
  18. Jassal GR, Schmidt BE. Error-based dynamic velocity range of piv processing algorithms. Experiments in Fluids. 2025a;66(4):113. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-025-03998-y
  19. Jassal GR, Schmidt BE. A review of optical flow velocimetry in fluid mechanics. Measurement Science and Technology. 2025b;36(3). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/adafcf
  20. Jassal GR, Schmidt BE. Simultaneous piv and safs measurements of the coupled dynamics of a jet impinging on a heated wall. In: AIAA SCITECH 2025 Forum; 2025c. p. 0472. DOI: 10.2514/6.2025-0472
  21. Jassal GR, Somersalo E, Calvetti D, Schmidt BE. A bayesian approach to locally varying regularization in optical flow velocimetry. Phys. Fluids (1994). 2025;37(5). DOI: 10.1063/5.0270225
  22. Jassal GR, Song M, Schmidt BE. Particle shadow velocimetry and its potential applications, limitations and advantages vis-à-vis particle image velocimetry. Experiments in Fluids. 2025;66(1). DOI: 10.1007/s00348-024-03934-6
  23. Jassal G, Somersalo E, Calvetti D, Schmidt B. A bayesian approach to locally varying regularization in optical flow velocimetry. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Application of Laser and Imaging Techniques to Fluid Mechanics. 2024;21:125. DOI: 10.55037/lxlaser.21st.102
  24. Kähler CJ, Scharnowski S, Cierpka C. On the resolution limit of digital particle image velocimetry. Experiments in Fluids. 2012;52(6):16291639. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-012-1280-x
  25. Liu DC, Nocedal J. On the limited memory bfgs method for large scale optimization. Mathematical Programming. 1989;45(1):503528. DOI: 10.1007/BF01589116
  26. Liu T, Shen L. Fluid flow and optical flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2008;614:253291. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112008003273
  27. Nuttall A. Some windows with very good sidelobe behavior. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. 1981;29(1):8491. DOI: 10.1109/TASSP.1981.1163506
  28. Raffel M, Willert CE, Scarano F, Kähler CJ, Wereley ST, Kompenhans J. Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide. Springer; 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68852-7
  29. Ruhnau P, Kohlberger T, Schnörr C, Nobach H. Variational optical flow estimation for particle image velocimetry. Experiments in Fluids. 2005;38(1):2132. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-004-0880-5
  30. Scharnowski S, Kähler CJ. Particle image velocimetry-classical operating rules from today’s perspective. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2020;135:106185. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106185
  31. Schmidt BE, Page WE, Jassal GR, Sutton JA. Sensitivity of wavelet-based optical flow velocimetry (wofv) to common experimental error sources. Measurement Science and Technology. 2024;36(1):015303. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ad8be8
  32. Schmidt BE, Sutton JA. High-resolution velocimetry from tracer particle fields using a wavelet-based optical flow method. Experiments in Fluids. 2019;60(37). DOI: 10.1007/s00348-019-2685-6
  33. Schmidt BE, Sutton JA. Improvements in the accuracy of wavelet-based optical flow velocimetry (wOFV) using an efficient and physically based implementation of velocity regularization. Experiments in Fluids. 2020;61(2). DOI: 10.1007/s00348-019-2869-0
  34. Schmidt BE, Sutton JA. A physical interpretation of regularization for optical flow methods in fluids. Experiments in Fluids. 2021;62(2). DOI: 10.1007/s00348-021-03147-1
  35. Schmidt BE, Woike MR. Wavelet-based optical flow analysis for background-oriented schlieren image processing. AIAA Journal. 2021;59(8):32093216. DOI: 10.2514/1.J060218
  36. Stamhuis E, Thielicke W. Pivlab–towards user-friendly, affordable and accurate digital particle image velocimetry in matlab. Journal of open research software. 2014;2(1):30. DOI: 10.5334/jors.bl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.584 | Journal eISSN: 2049-9647
Language: English
Submitted on: May 22, 2025
Accepted on: Jul 18, 2025
Published on: Oct 13, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Gauresh Raj Jassal, William Thielicke, Bryan E. Schmidt, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.