Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Adapting Structuration theory as a Comprehensive Theory for Distance Education: The ASTIDE Model Cover

Adapting Structuration theory as a Comprehensive Theory for Distance Education: The ASTIDE Model

Open Access
|Jul 2016

References

  1. 1. Aktaruzzaman, M. (2014). Community perception towards integrating vocational elements in open and distance learning in Bangladesh. Peer reviewed paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Brisbane 2014. Published in conference proceedings.
  2. 2. Anderson, A. (2010). Learning e-Learning: The restructuring of student’s beliefs and assumptions about learning. International Journal of E-Learning, 9(4), 435-461.
  3. 3. Archer, E., Chetty, Y., & Prinsloo, P. (2014). Benchmarking the habits and behaviours of successful students: A case study of academic-business collaboration. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/161710.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1617
  4. 4. Arts, B., & van Tatenhove, J. (2004). Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms. Policy Sciences, 37(3-4), 339-356.10.1007/s11077-005-0156-9
  5. 5. Baruque, L. B., & Melo, R. N. (2004). Learning theory and instructional design using learning objects. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(4), 343-370.
  6. 6. Caspi, A., & Gorsky, P. (2006). Instructional dialogue: distance education students’ dialogic behavior. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 735-752. Routledge.10.1080/03075070601007963
  7. 7. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organisation Science, 5(2), 121-147.10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
  8. 8. Dillahunt, T., Wang, B., & Teasley, S. (2014). Democratizing higher education: Exploring MOOC use among those who cannot afford a formal education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5). Retrieved on January 20, 2014 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/184110.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1841
  9. 9. Downes, S. (2007). What connectivism is? [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.co.uk/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html
  10. 10. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from a Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50-57. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x/abstract10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x
  11. 11. Findlay, P. (2007). Library Research Methods Divinity Graduate Students. Retrieved on June 30, 2014 from http://library.mcmaster.ca/instruction/divgrad07.pdf
  12. 12. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  13. 13. Gokool-Ramdoo, S. (2009). Policy deficit in distance education: A transactional distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(4). Retrieved on August 10, 2014 from http://irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/702/134410.19173/irrodl.v10i4.702
  14. 14. Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005a). A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 1-11.
  15. 15. Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005b). Dialogue: A theoretical framework for distance education instructional system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 137-144.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00448.x
  16. 16. Gorsky, P., Caspi, A., & Chajut, E. (2008). The theory of instructional dialogue: Toward a unified theory of instructional design. In Zheng. R & Pixy-Ferris. S. (Eds.), Understanding online instructional modelling: Theories and practices. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc.
  17. 17. Gourley, B., & Lane, A. (2009). Re‐invigorating openness at The Open University: the role of Open Educational Resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 24(1), 57-65. doi: 10.1080/0268051080262784510.1080/02680510802627845
  18. 18. Gulati, S. (2008). Technology-enhanced learning in developing nations: A review. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1). Retrieved from http://irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/477/101110.19173/irrodl.v9i1.477
  19. 19. Halperin, R., & Backhouse, J. (2007). Using structuration theory in IS research: Operationalising key constructs. Paper presented at the 28th International Conference on Information Systems, Montreal, Canada.
  20. 20. Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development. Computer, 41(6), 26-33. doi: 10.1109/mc.2008.19210.1109/MC.2008.192
  21. 21. HL WIKI International (2014). Research Methods. Retrieved on June 30, 2014 from http://hlwiki.slais.ubc.ca/index.php/Research_methods
  22. 22. Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. (1995). Constructivism and Computer-Mediated Communication in Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7-26. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08923649509526885#.VrSkxU8u9T410.1080/08923649509526885
  23. 23. Jones, M. R., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 127-157.10.2307/25148831
  24. 24. Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/523/1103
  25. 25. Mahmud, A. (2006). Bringing Information Technology to Rural Bangladesh by Boat. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Access to Learning Award Recipient 2005. Washington: Library & Information Resources. Available at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/reports/pub136/pub136.pdf
  26. 26. Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. London: Routledge.
  27. 27. Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance Education - A systems view. CA: Wadsworth.
  28. 28. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organisations. Organisation Science, 11(4), 404-428.10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
  29. 29. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  30. 30. Rashid, B., & Rahman, R. (2010). Strategic Intervention of ODL in Bangladesh. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(4), 93-108.
  31. 31. Rodriguez, O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like Courses: two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance, and ELearning, 2012(I). Retrieved on March 10, 2015 from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2012/Rodriguez.pdf
  32. 32. Saba, F., & Shearer, R. L. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 36-59.10.1080/08923649409526844
  33. 33. Sein, M. K. (2005). Paradigms of ICT in development. IFIP 9.4, Abuja, Nigeria.
  34. 34. Sein, M. K., & Harindranth, G. (2004). Conceptualizing the ICT artefact: Toward understanding the role of ICT in national development. Information Society, 20(1), 15-24. 10.1080/01972240490269942
  35. 35. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
  36. 36. Shearer, R. L. (2009). Transactional distance and dialogue in online learning. Paper presented at the 26th annual conference on distance teaching and learning, 2009. The University of Wisconsin. Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference
  37. 37. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Educational Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved October 10, 2014, from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
  38. 38. Simpson, O. (2013). Student retention in distance education: are we failing our students? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28(2), 105-119. doi: 10.1080/02680513.2013.84736310.1080/02680513.2013.847363
  39. 39. Subotzky, G., & Prinsloo, P. (2011). Turning the tide: a socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa. Distance Education, 32(2), 177-193. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2011.58484610.1080/01587919.2011.584846
  40. 40. van Tatenhove, J., Arts, B., & Leroy, P. (Eds.) (2000). Political Modernisation and the Environment: The Renewal of Environmental Policy Arrangements. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-015-9524-7
  41. 41. Tinio, V. L. (2004). ICT in Education. In UNDP-APDIP (Eds.), The e-ASEAN Task Force e- Primer Series. Retrieved from http://www.unapcict.org/ecohub/resources/
  42. 42. Tresman, S. (2002). Towards a Strategy for Improved Student Retention in Programmes of Open, Distance Education: A Case Study from the Open University UK. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1).10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.75
  43. 43. Unwin, T. (2009). ICT4D: Information and communication technologies for development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  44. 44. Walsham, G. (2002). Cross-cultural software production and use: A structurational analysis. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 359-380.10.2307/4132313
  45. 45. Wheeler-Brooks, J. (2009). Structuration theory and critical consciousness: potential applications for social work practice. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 36(1), 123-140.
  46. 46. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Language: English
Page range: 19 - 35
Published on: Jul 26, 2016
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Md Aktaruzzaman, Margaret Plunkett, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.