Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring the Factors Associated with MOOC Engagement, Retention and the Wider Benefits for Learners Cover

Exploring the Factors Associated with MOOC Engagement, Retention and the Wider Benefits for Learners

By: Dominic Petronzi and  Munib Hadi  
Open Access
|Apr 2017

References

  1. 1. Caufield, M., Collier, A., & Halawa, S. (2013). Rethinking online community in MOOCs used for blended learning. Educause Review Online, 1-11.
  2. 2. DeBoer, J., Ho, A., Stump, G., & Breslow, L. (2014). Changing “course:” reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 74-84.10.3102/0013189X14523038
  3. 3. Gorard, S. (2001). Quantitative Methods in Educational Research: The role of numbers.
  4. 4. Greene, J. A., Oswald, C. A., & Pomerantz, J. (2015). Predictors of retention and achievement in a massive open online course. American Educational Research Journal (Online First).10.3102/0002831215584621
  5. 5. Guardia, L., Maina, M., & Sangra, A. (2013). MOOC design principles: A pedagogical approach from the learner’s perspective. eLearning Papers, 33.
  6. 6. Guo, P. J., & Reinecke, K. (2014). Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs.10.1145/2556325.2566247
  7. 7. Hadi, S. M., & Gagen, P. (2016). New model for measuring MOOCs completion rates. Paper presented at the European MOOCs Stakeholder Summit. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/20434486/New_model_for_measuring_MOOCs_completion_rates
  8. 8. Hadi, S. M., & Rawson, R. (2016). Driving learner engagement and completion within MOOCs: a case for structured learning support. Paper presented at the European MOOCs Stakeholder Summit.
  9. 9. Hew, K. F. (2014). Promoting engagement in online courses: what strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology (Online First).
  10. 10. Hone, K. S., & El Said, G, R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: a survey study. Computers and Education, 98, 157-168.10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016
  11. 11. Jansen, D., & Schuwer, R. (2015). Institutional MOOC strategies in Europe. Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in October - December 2014. EADTU. Retrieved from http://www.eadtu.eu/documents/Publications/OEenM/Institutional_MOOC_strategies_in_Europe.pdf
  12. 12. Koller, D., Ng, A., Do, C., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses: In depth. Educause Review.
  13. 13. Leach, M., Hadi, S. M., & Bostock, A. (2016). Supporting diverse learner goals through modular design and micro-learning. Paper presented at the European MOOCs Stakeholder Summit. London: Continuum, made easy.
  14. 14. Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-563.10.1177/1052562904271199
  15. 15. Petronzi, D., Hadi, S. M., & Leach, M. (2016). Do self-assigned learning intentions reflect upon or predict MOOC engagement? Unpublished Research Paper.
Language: English
Page range: 112 - 129
Published on: Apr 6, 2017
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Dominic Petronzi, Munib Hadi, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.