Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Willingness of Generation Z to Financially Support CSR – A Central European Study Cover

The Willingness of Generation Z to Financially Support CSR – A Central European Study

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Areeda, Ph. E. (1996). The Socratic method. Harvard Law Review, 109(5), 911–922.
  2. Balcerzak, A. P. (2016). Technological Potential of European Economy. Proposition of Measurement with Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 12(3), 7–17. DOI: 10.14254/18005845.2016/12-3/1.
  3. Bansal, P. and Song, H. C. (2017). Similar But Not the Same: Differentiating Corporate Sustainability from Corporate Responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105–149. DOI: 10.5465/annals.2015.0095.
  4. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.
  5. Bassiouni, D. H. and Hackley, Ch. (2014). ‘Generation Z’ children's adaptation to digital consumer culture: A critical literature review. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 13(2), 113–133(21). DOI: 10.1362/147539214X14024779483591.
  6. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S. et al. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488–506.
  7. Cerchia, R. E. and Piccolo, K. (2019). The Ethical Consumer and Codes of Ethics in the Fashion Industry. Laws, 8, 23. DOI: 10.3390/laws8040023.
  8. Chandler, D. (2017). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Sustainable Value Creation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  9. Chwistecka-Dudek, H. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility: supporters vs. opponents of the concept. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 4(4), 171–179.
  10. Czubala, A. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility in marketing. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 4(1), 103–111.
  11. Dabija, D. C., Pop, N. A., Postelnicu, C. (2016). Ethics of the garment retail within the context of globalization and sustainable development. Industria Textilă, 67(4), 270–279.
  12. Dabija, D. C. and Băbuţ, R. (2019). Enhancing Apparel Store Patronage through Retailers’ Attributes and Sustainability. A Generational Approach. Sustainability, 11(17), 4532.
  13. Drucker, P. F. (2015). Innovation and Entreprenuership. London and New York, Routledge Classics.
  14. Dvouletý, O. (2017). What is the Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Unemployment in Visegrad Countries? Central European Business Review, 6(2), 42–53. DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.179.
  15. European Commission (2015). European Multistakeholder Forum on Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved May 23, 2020, from https://europa.eu/newsroom/events/european-multistakeholder-forum-corporate-social-responsibility_en.
  16. European Commission (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility & Responsible Business Conduct. Retrieved May 23, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/sustainability/corporate-social-responsibility_en.
  17. European Commission (2020). Press Corner – Speech by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary on the new MFF, own resources and the Recovery Plan on May 13, 2020. Retrieved May 23, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_20_877.
  18. European Economic and Social Committee (2019). Toward a more resilient and sustainable European Economy. Retrieved May 23, 2020, from https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/our-work/opinions-information-reports/opinions/towards-more-resilient-and-sustainable-european-economy-own-initiative-opinion.
  19. Morgan Stanley (2017). Millennials Drive Growth in Sustainable Investing. Morgan Stanley. Retrieved February 2, 2020, from https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/sustainable-socially-responsible-investing-millennials-drive-growth.
  20. Gallardo-Vázquez, D., Valdez, L. and Castuera-Diáz, A. M. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility as an Antecedent of innovation, Reputation, and Competitiveness Success: A Multiple Mediation Analysis. Sustainability, 11(20), 5614. DOI: 10.3390/su11205614.
  21. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.
  22. Haski-Leventhal, D. (2018). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. Los Angeles: SAGE Publication.
  23. Kliestikova, J. et al. (2019). Quo Vadis Brand Loyalty? Comparative Study of Perceived Brand Value Sources. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 190–203.
  24. Křečková Kroupová, Z. (2015). The Latest Trends in the Corporate Sustainability and its Implications for Czech Businesses. Central European Business Review, 4(2), 12–20.
  25. Li, F.; Minor, D., Wang, J. et al. (2019). A learning curve of the market. Chasing alpha of socially responsible firms. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 109, 103772.
  26. Lovciova, K., Paksiova, R. (2018). European Integration and Reporting Requirements of Companies in the Slovak Republic. [in:] Staníčková, M., Melecký, L., Kovářová, E., Dvoroková, K. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on European Integration 2018, May 17–18, 2018, Ostrava, 940–947 of 1121.
  27. MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2017). European Myriad of Approaches to Parasitic Commercial Practices. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(2), 167–180. DOI: 10.24136/oc.v8i2.11.
  28. MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2018). Fostering Innovation – a Myth or Reality of the EU in 2018, [in:] Staníčková, M., Melecký, L., Kovářová, E., Dvoroková, K. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on European Integration 2018, May 17–18, 2018, Ostrava, 965–973 of 1121.
  29. MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019a). Corporate Social Responsibility Information in Annual Reports in the EU – Czech Case Study. Sustainability, 11, 237. DOI: 10.3390/su11010237.
  30. MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019b). Harmonization of the protection against misleading commercial practices: ongoing divergences in Central European countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(2), 239–252. DOI: 10.24136/oc.2019.012.
  31. MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019c). R&D expenditure and innovation in the EU and selected member states. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation – JEMI, 15(1), 13–33. DOI: doi.org/10.7341/20191511.
  32. MacGregor Pelikánová, R. and MacGregor, R. (2017). European e-Justice Portal – Reality of Electronic One-Stop-Shop for Publication of Financial Statements in the EU, [in:] Jindřichovská, Irena; Kubíčková, Dana. Conference: 5th International Scientific Conference on IFRS – Global Rules and Local Use. Anglo-American University.
  33. MacGregor, R. K. and MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019). Shareholder Engagement for Corporate Governance in the Light of the Harmonization and Transposition. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, VII(4), 22–34.
  34. Marčeta, M. and Bojnec, Š. (2020). Drivers of Global Competitiveness in the European Union Countries in 2014 and 2017. Organizacija, 53(1), 37–52. DOI: 10.2478/orga-2020-0003.
  35. Matuszak, Ł. and Róźanska, E. (2017). CSR Disclosure in Polish-Listed Companies in the Light of Directive 2014/95/EU Requirements: Empirical Evidence. Sustainability, 9, 2304. DOI: 10.3390/su9122304.
  36. McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.
  37. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York, Universe Books.
  38. Moon, H.-C. et al. (2014). Extending Porter’s generic strategies: from three to eight. European Journal of International Management – EJIM, 8(2), 205–225. DOI: 10.1504/EJIM.2014.059583.
  39. Mulyana, D., Rudiana, D., Taufig, A. R. (2019). The Role of Value Co-Creation based on Engagement to Develop Brand Advantage. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 305–317.
  40. Olšanová, K., Gook, G. and Zlatić, M. (2018). Influence of Luxury Companies’ Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Consumer Purchase Intention: Development of Theoretical Framework. Central European Business Review, 7(3), 1–25.
  41. Osei-Tutu, J. J. (2019). Socially Responsible Corporate IP. FIU Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Research Paper No. 19–01.
  42. Petera, P., Wagner, J., Paksiova, R., Krehnacova, A. (2019). Sustainability Information in Annual Reports of Companies Domiciled in the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 30(4), 483–495. DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.30.4.22481.
  43. Polcyn, J. (2018). Human development level as a modifier of education efficiency. Management-Poland, 22(2), 171–186.
  44. Polcyn, J., Stępień, S. and Czyżewski, B. (2019). The Measurement of the Quality of the Environment and its Determinants in Poland and in the Regional Perspective. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 21(2), 11–21. DOI: 10.29302/oeconomica.2019.21.2.1.
  45. Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.
  46. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance. The role of good corporate governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19, 137–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001.
  47. Scherer, G. and Palazzo, G. (2011). The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899931. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x.
  48. Schmidt, F. L. and Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of Meta-Analysis – Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. London, UK: SAGE.
  49. Schüz, M. (2012). Sustainable Corporate Responsibility – The Foundation of successful Business in the New Millennium. Central European Business Review, 1(2), 7–15.
  50. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research – A Practical Handbook. London, UK: SAGE.
  51. Sroka, W. and Lörinczy, M. (2015). The perception of ethics in business: Analysis of research results. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 156–163. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01614-7.
  52. Sroka, W. and Szántó, R. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics in Controversial Sectors: Analysis of Research Results. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation – JEMI, 14, 111–126. DOI: 10.7341/20181435.
  53. Staníčková, M. and Melecký, L. (2018) Understanding of resilience in the context of regional development using composite index approach: the case of European Union NUTS-2 regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 5(1), 231–254. DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2018.1470939.
  54. Strouhal, J.; Gurvitš, N., Nikitina-Kalamäe et al. (2015). Finding the link between CSR reporting and corporate financial performance: evidence on Czech and Estonian listed companies. Central European Business Review, 4(3), 48–59. DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.132.
  55. Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and Social Interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2), 103–113. DOI: 10.1353/jip.2015.0021.
  56. Vourvachis, P. and Woodward, T. (2015). Content analysis in social and environmental reporting research: Trends and challenges. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 16(2), 166–195. DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-04-2013-0027.
  57. Vveinhardt, J., Stonkute, E. and Sroka, W. (2019). Discourse on corporate social responsibility in the external communication of agricultural enterprises. European Journal of International Management – EJIM, 13(6), 846–879. DOI: 10.1504/EJIM.2019.102816.
  58. Vveinhardt, J. and Sroka, W. (2020). Nepotism and Favouritism in Polish and Lithuanian Organizations: The Context of Organizational. Sustainability, 12(4), 1425. DOI: 10.3390/su12041425.
  59. Yin, R. K. (2008). Study Research. Design Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2020-0016 | Journal eISSN: 1804-8285 | Journal ISSN: 1804-6746
Language: English
Page range: 271 - 282
Published on: Dec 31, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Radka MacGregor Pelikánová, Robert K. MacGregor, published by European Research University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.