References
- Aquinas (2025). Summa Theologiae (A. J. Freddoso, Trans.). Retrieved from https://www.freddoso.com/summa-translation/TOC.htm. Aceesed 21 May 2025.
- Augustine (2014). Early writings (J. H. S. Burleigh, Ed. & Trans.). Westminster John Knox Press.
- Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? AltaMira Press.
- Barrett, J. L. (2012). Toward a cognitive science of Christianity. J. B. Stump & A. G. Padgett (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to science and Christianity (pp. 317–334). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Bering, J. (2002). The existential theory of mind. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 3–24. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.6.1.3.
- Braddock, M. (2022). Natural nonbelief in God: Prehistoric humans, divine hiddenness, and debunking. D. E. Machuca (Ed.), Evolutionary debunking arguments: Ethics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of mathematics, metaphysics, and epistemology (pp. 160–184). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003026419-10.
- Dahl, E. (2018). Wittgenstein and Augustine on seeing miracles. J. Doody, A. R. Eodice, & K. Paffenroth (Eds.), Augustine and Wittgenstein (pp. 95–112). Rowan & Littlefield Publisher.
- Davies, B. (1993). The thought of Thomas Aquinas. Oxford University Press.
- De Cruz, H. (2014). Cognitive science of religion and the study of theological concepts. Topoi, 33(2), 487–497. DOI: 10.1007/s11245-013-9168-9.
- De Cruz, H. (2022). Religion and science. E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/religion-science/. Accessed 21 May 2025.
- Dulles, A. (1994). The assurance of the things hoped for: A theology of Christian faith. Oxford University Press.
- Edwards, D. (2010). How God acts: Creation, redemption, and special divine action. Fortress Press.
- Gervais, W., & Henrich, J. (2010). The Zeus problem: Why representational content biases cannot explain faith in gods. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(3–4), 383–389. DOI: 10.1163/156853710X531249.
- Gervais, W., Willard, A., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2011). The cultural transmission of faith: Why innate intuitions are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion, 41(3), 389–410. DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2011.604510.
- Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Blaming God for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 7–16. DOI: 10.1177/1088868309350299.
- Horton, M. (2018). Justification (Vol. 1). Zondervan.
- Hume, D. (2007). Dialogues concerning natural religion and other writings (D. Coleman, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- James, W. (2004). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. Routledge.
- Jong, J., Kavanagh, C., & Visala, A. (2015). Born idolaters: The limits of the philosophical implications of the cognitive science of religion. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, 57(2), 244–266. DOI: 10.1515/nzsth-2015-0012.
- Kant, I. (2002). Critique of the power of judgment (P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
- Kierkegaard, S. (2009). Philosophical crumbs (M. G. Piety, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
- Kittle, S. (2022). God is (probably) a cause among causes: Why the primary/secondary cause distinction doesn’t help in developing noninterventionist accounts of special divine action. Theology and Science, 20(2), 247–262. DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2022.2057468.
- Lanman, J. A., & Buhrmester, M. D. (2017). Religious actions speak louder than words: Exposure to credibility-enhancing displays predicts theism. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(1), 3–16. DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2015.1117011.
- Launonen, L. (2021). Why cognitive science of religion matters for Christian theology and philosophy: An overview. Philosophy, Theology, and the Sciences, 8(2), 209–223.
- Leech, D., & Visala, A. (2011). Naturalistic explanation for religious belief. Philosophy Compass, 6(8), 552–563. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00414.x.
- McGrew, T. (2019). Miracles. E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/miracles/. Accessed 21 May 2025.
- Messer, N. (2023). What (if anything) should Christian theology learn from the cognitive science of religion? Theology and Science, 21(3), 504–519. DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2023.2230435.
- Nola, R. (2018). Demystifying religious belief. H. van Eyghen, R. Peels, & G. van den Brink (Eds.), New developments in the cognitive science of religion (pp. 71–92). Springer.
- Piety, M. G. (2017). Kierkegaard on nature and miracles: A reply to Hampson. Retrieved from https://pietyonkierkegaard.com/2017/06/21/kierkegaard-on--nature-and-miracles-a-reply-to-hampson/.Accessd21May2025.
- Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. Oxford University Press.
- Ritchie, S. L. (2019). Divine action and the human mind. Cambridge University Press.
- Ruczaj, S. (2022). Grace contra nature: The etiology of christian religious beliefs from the perspective of theology and the cognitive science of religion. Theology and Science, 20(4), 428–444. DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2022.2124480.
- Ruczaj, S. (2024). Is christian belief supernatural? Grace, nature and the cognitive science of religion. TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology, 8(1), 227–247. DOI: 10.14428/thl.v8i1.68683.
- Saunders, N. (2002). Divine action and modern science. Cambridge University Press.
- The Holy Bible (2011). The Holy Bible. New International Version. Zondervan.
- Tremlin, T. (2006). Minds and gods: The cognitive foundations of religion. Oxford University Press.
- Van den Brink, G. (2023). Are theological explanations superfluous? The cognitive science of religion and Ockham’s razor. D. A. Finnegan, D. H. Glass, M. Leidenhag, & D. N. Livingstone (Eds.), Conjunctive explanations in science and religion (pp. 215–235). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003251101-23.
- Westphal, M. (2014). Kierkegaard’s concept of faith. Eerdmans.