Table 1
Partnerships by Perceived Value for each Focus University.
| MU | UoN | KCMUCo | MUHAS | Consortia Mentioned at more than 1 University | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher-Valued | 7 | 4 | 6 | 13 | 1 |
| Medium-Valued | 9 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 2 |
| Lower-Valued | 15 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 31 | 34 | 24 | 33 | 3 |
Table 2
Higher-Value Partners Identified & Analysed.
| Country | World Bank Income Group8 | # of Higher-Value Partners | Total # of Partnerships Identified | % of All Partnerships Higher-Valued |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA | High | 9 | 41 | 22% |
| Sweden | High | 6 | 8 | 75% |
| Canada | High | 4 | 6 | 67% |
| Germany | High | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| Netherlands | High | 2 | 4 | 50% |
| Consortium | Not applicable | 2 | 10 | 20% |
| Denmark | High | 1 | 2 | 50% |
| Kenya | Low | 1 | 2 | 50% |
| Norway | High | 1 | 7 | 14% |
| South Africa | Upper-Middle | 1 | 8 | 13% |
| Uganda | Low | 1 | 2 | 50% |
| UK | High | 1 | 11 | 9% |
| Other Countries | Not applicable | 0 | 22 | 0% |
| TOTAL | 31 | 125 | 25% |
Figure 1
Area Graph of Partnerships by Value and Duration.