Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cardiac Manifestations in Patients with COVID-19: A Scoping Review Cover

Cardiac Manifestations in Patients with COVID-19: A Scoping Review

Open Access
|Jan 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram.

Table 1

Characteristics of the included 63 studies and demographics of COVID-19 patients.

STUDY CHARACTERISTICS (N = 63)
Systematic reviews only14 (22.2%)
Systematic review and Meta-Analysis49 (77.8%)
Peer reviewed46 (73.0%)
Non-peer reviewed17 (27.0%)
LOCATION OF PRIMARY STUDIES IN THE REPORTING 56 SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Single country studies- from China11/56 (19.6%)
Multi-country studies45/56 (80.4%)
DEMOGRAPHICS OF COVID-19 PATIENTS
AGE MEAN/MEDIAN YEARS (RANGE)NUMBER OF STUDIES (N = 63)
≥50–7510 (16%)
≥40–8715 (24%)
≥30–735 (8%)
≥20–956 (10%)
≥8–1091 (2%)
Not reported26 (41%)
Figure 2

Origin of primary studies included in the reporting systematic reviews.

Table 2

Summary of cardiac complications in COVID-19 patients.

CARDIAC COMPLICATIONS IN COVID-19 PATIENTSESTIMATESREFERENCES
Acute cardiac injury (ACI) (frequency)
Overall frequency **15% to 33%, and 75% in 1 study[20, 23, 25, 27, 28, 45, 53, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61]
Patients with CVD and/or in severe disease **25%, to 33%[23, 25]
In fatal cases61.6% to 72.6%[53, 59, 60]
In patients with Takotsubo syndrome75%[20]
Increased risk of ACI in severe disease(OR) 13.5, 6.6, 6.3[23, 30, 31, 47, 60, 62, 63]
(RR) 6.0, 13.8, 8.5, 5.7
Association of ACI with mortality(OR) 17.0, 19.6, 20.3, 21.2, 22.5[23, 30, 31, 33, 34, 47, 54, 59, 63]
(RR) 3.8, 4.9, 8.0, 8.5, 8.9
ARRHYTHMIA
Overall**0.3% to 44.0%[21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 41, 42, 43, 61]
Incidence in severe/fatal patients**33.0% to 48.0%[21, 25, 29, 30, 34]
Incidence in non-severe patients**3.1% to 6.9%[21, 30, 34]
Incidence related to use of HCQ and/or CQ**0.3% to 44.0%[41, 42, 43]
QT prolongation (overall frequency) **9% to 44%[29, 41, 42, 43]
Heart failure/shock (frequency)**3.4% to 23.7%[23, 25, 27, 28, 61]
Cardiac arrest0.3%, 5.7%[28, 42]
Cardiomyopathy7%[25]
ACS/CAD6.2%, 10%, 33%*[24, 25, 28]

[i] OR: odds ratio, RR: Relative risk, HCQ: Hydroxychloroquine, CQ: Chloroquine, ACI: acute cardiac injury, ACS/CAD: Acute coronary syndrome/Coronary artery disease. * Reporting in a case series in a systematic review [24] ** Reporting the lowest and highest proportions.

Table 3

Studies addressing acute cardiac injury and myocardial injury in COVID-19 patients.

SOURCESAMPLE SIZEPRE-EXISTING CARDIAC DISEASE IN STUDY POPULATIONACI/MI FREQUENCYACI/MI SEVERE VS NON-SEVERE/MILD DS (OR)/(RR)ACI/MI AND MORTALITY (OR)/(RR)
Bavishi et al. [45]11685NA/NR20%-
De Lorenzo et al. [56]1229NA/NR16%-
Zou et al. [53]2224NA/NR24%-
Huang et al. [62]5328NA/NROR 13.5 [3.6, 50.5]-
Li et al. [30]4189NA/NRRR 6.0 [3.0, 11.8]RR 3.8 [2.1, 7.0]
Luo et al. [63]129380NA/NROR 6.6[3.7, 11.6]OR 17.0 [7.9, 36.4]
Li et al. [64]311845-67%15%–44%OR 21.2 [10.2, 43.9]
Prastilumkum et al. [57]8971NA/NR20%
Potere et al. [58]148669.4%15%
Zeng et al. [54]5726NA/NRRR 4.9 [3.8, 6.2]
Zuin et al. [59]1686NA/NR23.90%OR 22.5 [16.1, 31.4]
Santosa et al. [47]2389NA/NRRR 13.8 [5.5, 34.5]RR 8.0 [5.1, 12.3]
Dalia et al. [31]5967NA/NR-RR 8.5 [3.6, 20.0]RR 8.5 [3.6, 20.0]
Gu et al. [60]7679NA/NR21%RR 5.7 [3.7, 8.8]
Momtazmanesh et al. [23]11569NA/NR25.30%OR 6.3 [4.2, 9.8]OR 19.6 [10.3, 37.5]
Shoar et al. [32]3257NA/NROR 20.3 [7.8, 53.3]
Martins-Filho et al. [33]1141NA/NRRR 8.9 [4.2, 19.3]
Amir et al. [65]29056NA/NR33%
Singh et al. [20]12NA/NR75%
Sardinha et al. [27]331613.08%17.09%
Kunutsor et al. [28]581514.6%16.30%
Vakili et al. [61]6389NA/NR15.68%

[i] NA: Not available, NR: Not reported, ACI: Acute cardiac injury, MI: Myocardial injury, OR: Odds ratio, RR: Relative risk.

Table 4

Arrhythmias and QT prolongation in COVID-19 patients in ascending order of publication.

SOURCESTUDIES/(SAMPLE SIZE)ARRHYTHMIAS (INCIDENCE)QT PROLONGATION
Li et al. [30]22 (4189)44.4% (severe), 6.9% (non-severe)
Jankelson et al. [43]10 (NR)7.1% on high dose CQ10%
Kunutsor et al. [28]17 (5815)9.3%
Kim et al. [40]40 (11437)HCQ + AZ OR 1.8 [1.1, 3.3]. There was no significance with HCQ, high-dose HCQ or AZ monotherapy group.
Khadka et al. [39]6 (NR)HCQ+AZ OR 0.8 [0.6, 1.2]. Increase in critical QTc threshold OR 1.9 [0.8, 4.6] nor absolute ΔQTc ≥60ms OR 2.0 [0.6, 7.0] among HCQ+AZ versus HCQ alone.
Eljaaly et al. [38]9 (916)No HCQ associated cardiac toxicity reported
Dalia et al. [31]20 (5967)Increased risk in non-survivors/severe disease versus survivors/non-severe disease RR 3.6 [2.0, 6.4]
Shafi et al. [24]61 (NR)14% (AF (7%), VT/VF (5.9%) and AFl)
Momtazmanesh et al. [23]35 (11569)26.1%No cardiotoxicity reported
Li et al. [34]23 (4631)43.8% (severe), 3.1% (non-severe). Newly occurring arrhythmias were at a higher risk of developing severe disease/ICU admission RR 13.1 [7.0, 24.5]
Das et al. [44]17 (8071)No significant risk in HCQ group. significantly increased in the HCQ + AZ groupNo significant risk of DILQTS in HCQ group vs control. Significantly increased in the HCQ + AZ group
Pranata et al. [21]4 (784)19% overall. 48% (severe), 6% (non-severe). increased risk of poor outcome RR 8.0 [3.8, 16.8]
Prodromos et al. [36]25 (NR)No TDP or related deaths with HCQ + AZT. Found to substantially decrease arrhythmias.
Malaty et al. [29]23 (4911)6.9% with. HCQ, CQ, AZ. ventricular arrhythmias (VT, VF), atrial arrhythmias (AF, Afl, AT), brady-arrhythmias (AV block, sinus bradycardia).14.2% overall. 15.9% DILQTS with AZ + HCQ/CQ, 11.44% DILQTS with HCQ or CQ or AZ
Martins-Filho et al. [33]6 (1141)Risk for mortality RR 4.9 [1.2, 10.9]
Michaud et al. [35]38 (NR)High to moderate risk of LQTS for CQ, HCQ, Favipiravir, Remdesivir, and LPV/r. Not for AZ.
Shoar et al. [32]12 (3257)Risk for mortality OR 22.4 [1.8, 283.6]
Vakili et al. [61]30 (6389)16.6%
Ladapo et al. [37]5 (5577)1/936 in HCQ group versus 1/469 control (1/4 reporting study). 0% in 3/4 reporting studiesNo HCQ associated LQT reported
Hessami et al. [66]56 (29056)Incidence- 11% (overall), 33% (severe Patients). Associated with ICU admission (OR: 22.2, 95%CI 4.5-110.0)
Zeng et al. [54]17 (5726)CI vs non-CI groups RR 5.7 [0.7, 47.0]
Hamam et al. [22]9 (1445)19.7%
Tleyjeh et al. [42]19 (5652)0.3% (overall). 5% incidence of discontinuation of CQ or HCQ due to prolonged QTc or arrhythmias (13 studies of 4334 patients)9% QTc change form baseline of ≥ 60 ms or QTc ≥ 500 ms, 5% discontinuation of CQ or HCQ due to prolonged QTc or arrhythmias (13 studies of 4334 patients).
Takla et al. [41]24 (NR)44% with HCQ and/or CQ, 44% found no evidence of a significant difference, and 11% mixed results44% greater incidence
Sardinha et al. [27]12 (3316)1.77%. (AF most common)
Thakkar et al. [26]10144%

[i] TDP: Torsade de Pointes, OR: odds ratio, RR: relative risk, HCQ: Hydroxychloroquine, CQ: Chloroquine, AZ: Azithromycin, ICU: Intensive care unit, VT: Ventricular tachycardia, VF: Ventricular fibrillation, AF: Atrial fibrillation, Afl: Atrial flutter, AT: Atrial tachycardia, AV block: Atrioventricular block, LPV/r: Lopinavir/Ritonavir, CI: cardiac injury.

Table 5

Myocarditis and COVID-19.

SOURCESTUDIES/(SAMPLE SIZE)FREQUENCY/AGE (MEAN RANGE)/PRE-EXISTING DISEASECLINICAL SYMPTOMSECGIMAGING – ECHO AND CMRIINVESTIGATIONS – OTHERELEVATED BIOMARKERSTHERAPEUTICS
Sawalha et al. [48]14 case reports (14)100%, 21 to 78 years
CVD 8%, HTN 33%
Dyspnea 71%, Shock 58%, Chest pain 57%, Cough 67%, fever 75%diffuse ST-segment elevation 25%, ST-segment depression 25%, T-wave inversion 25%, arrythmias 17%Reduced LVEF 50%, pericardial effusion 42%, cardiac tamponade 20%, diffuse hypokinesis 30%.
Diffuse gadolinium enhancement 100%
CT angiography 17%, invasive coronary angiography 25%, endomyocardial biopsy 7%Trop. 86%, CKMB 17%, NT-BNP 50%, CRP 100%, IL6 100%Glucocorticoids, Ig, colchicine. For cytokine storm – Tocilizumab, INF.
ECMO (14%)
Kariyana et al. [49]11 (NR)12% to 100%, 21 to 74 yearsDyspnea 82%, chest pain/tightness 55%, fever 55%, cough 55%ST elevation 56%, T wave inversion 33%Reduced LVEF 67%, pericardial effusion 33%, cardiomegaly 67%.
Diffuse gadolinium enhancement 100%
Endomyocardial biopsiesTrop. T 100%, CKMB 100%, NT-BNP 100%Corticosteroides, LPV/r, HCQ, Ig, tzp, inotropes, vasopressor
Shafi et al. [24]61 (NR)12% to 100%, 8 to 79 yearsSteroids, LPV/r, Tocilizumab
Thakkar et al. [26]101 (NR)19%–28%, NR

[i] ECHO: Electrocardiogram, LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction, CMRI: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, CT angiography: computed tomography angiography, CK-MB: Creatine kinase-MB, pro-BNP: pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide, IL-6: inteleuking-6, CRP:C-reactive protein, LPV/r: Lopinavir Ritonavir, HCQ: Hydroxychloroquine, Ig: Immunoglobulin, tzp: piperacillin/tazobactam, ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, INF: interferon.

Table 6

Risks associated to the use of RAAS inhibitors in COVID-19 patients.

SOURCEACEI/ARB-TESTING COVID-19 POSITIVEACEI/ARB-HOSPITALIZATIONACEI/ARB-SEVERE DISEASEACEI/ARB-LENGTH OF HOSPITALIZATIONACEI/ARB-MORTALITY
Asiimwe et al. [67]OR 1.01 [0.93, 1.10]OR 1.16 [0.80, 1.68]OR 1.04 [0.76, 1.42]MD-0.45OR 0.86 [0.64, 1.15]
Xu et al. [74]aOR 1.00 [0.94, 1.05]aOR 0.95 [0.73, 1.24]aOR 0.87 [0.66, 1.14]
Beressa et al. [68]RR 0.92 [0.74, 1.14]WMD -2.33 [5.60, 0.75]RR 0.73 [0.63, 0.85]
De Almeida-Pititto et al. [69]OR 0.76 [0.39, 1.49]
Baral et al. [70]OR 0.833 [0.605, 1.148]OR 0.650 [0.356, 1.187]
Barochiner et al. [76]RR 0.81 [0.63-1.04]RR 0.81 [0.63-1.04]
Bezabih et al. [77]OR 0.84 [0.73, 0.96]OR 0.84 [0.73, 0.96]
Flacco et al. [71]OR 1.00 [0.84, 1.18]OR 0.85 [0.81, 1.03]
Garg et al. [78]OR 1.18 [0.91, 1.54]OR 1.03 [0.69, 1.55]
Zhang et al. [72]OR 0.93 [0.85, 1.02]aOR 0.76 [0.52, 1.12]aOR 0.97 [0.77, 1.23]
Ssentongo et al. [75]OR 0.93 [0.85, 1.02]RR 0.65 [0.45, 0.94]
Kaur et al. [79]OR 2.1 [1.09, 4.05]OR 1.08 [0.79, 1.46]OR 0.91 [0.65, 1.26]
Liu X et al. [73]OR 0.95 [0.89, 1.05]OR 0.75 [0.59, 0.96]OR 0.52 [0.35, 0.79]
Bin Abdulhak et al. [80]aOR 0.33 [0.22, 0.49]
REF. NO.ACEI- TESTING POSITIVEARB- TESTING POSITIVEACEI- HOSPITALIZATION, ARB- HOSPITALIZATIONACEI- SEVERE DISEASEARB- SEVERE DISEASEACEI- MORTALITYARB- MORTALITY
Asiimwe et al. [67]aOR 0.97 [0.87, 1.09]aOR 0.90 [0.65, 1.24]aOR 0.78 [0.47, 1.28], aOR 1.09 [0.67, 1.77]aOR 0.72 [0.46, 1.13]aOR 1.12 [0.69, 1.82]aOR 0.80 [0.46, 1.38]aOR 1.11 [0.94, 1.32]
Xu J et al. [74]aOR 0.95 [0.88, 1.02]aOR 0.97 [0.82, 1.14]aOR 0.81 [0.61, 1.08]aOR 1.09 [0.76, 1.55]aOR 0.51 [0.23, 1.12]aOR 1.63 [0.61, 4.35]
Bezabih et al. [77]OR 0.77 [0.63, 0.93]OR 1.13 [0.95, 1.35]OR 0.77 [0.63, 0.93]OR 1.13 [0.95, 1.35]
Flacco et al. [71]OR 0.90 [0.65, 1.26]OR 0.92 [0.75, 1.12]OR 0.90 [0.65, 1.26]OR 0.92 [0.75, 1.12]
Garg et al. [78]OR 1.34 [0.96, 1.87]OR 1.25 [0.93, 1.67]OR 1.07 [0.37, 3.05]OR 1.07 [0.81, 1.43]
Zhang et al. [72]aOR 0.90 [0.79, 1.04]OR 1.12 [0.96, 1.32]OR 0.93 [0.59, 1.48]OR 0.91 [0.71, 1.17]
Ssentongo et al. [75]RR 0.65 [0.32, 1.30]

[i] ACEI: Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, ARB: Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, OR: odds ratio, aOR: adjusted odds ratio, RR: relative risk, WMD: weighted mean difference.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1037 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 22, 2021
Accepted on: Dec 18, 2021
Published on: Jan 12, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Sasha Peiris, Pedro Ordunez, Donald DiPette, Raj Padwal, Pierre Ambrosi, Joao Toledo, Victoria Stanford, Thiago Lisboa, Sylvain Aldighieri, Ludovic Reveiz, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.