Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Consensus group sessions are useful to reconcile stakeholders’ perspectives about network performance evaluation Cover

Consensus group sessions are useful to reconcile stakeholders’ perspectives about network performance evaluation

Open Access
|Dec 2010

References

  1. Borgatti S The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology Journal of Management 2003 29 6 991 1013
  2. Goodwin N Perri 6 Peck E Freeman T Posaner R Managing across diverse networks of care: lessons from other sectors 2004 London NCCSDO [cited Nov 9 2010]. Available from: http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/adhoc/39-policy-report.pdf
  3. Kenis P Provan KG Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance Public Administration 2009 87 3 440 56
  4. Waldfogel J The new wave of service integration The Social Service Review 1997 71 3 463 84
  5. Contandriopoulos A-P Denis J-L Touati N Rodriguez R Intégration des soins: dimensions et mise en oeuvre Care integration: dimensions and practice Rupture: Revue Transdisciplinaire en Santé 2001 8 2 38 52 [in French]
  6. Keast R Brown K Mandell M Getting the right mix: unpacking integration meaning and strategies International Public Management Journal 2007 10 1 9 33
  7. Keast R Mandell MP Brown K Woolcock G Network structures: working differently and changing expectations Public Administration Review 2004 64 3 363 71
  8. Provan KG Milward HB A premilinary theory of interorganizational effectiveness: a comparative study of four community health systems Administrative Science Quarterly 1995 40 1 1 33
  9. Fleury M-J Integrated service networks: the Quebec case Health Services Management Research 2006 8 19 3 153 65
  10. Mandell M Keast R Evaluating network arrangement. Toward revised performance measure Public Performance and Management Review 2007 30 4 574 97
  11. Mandell MP Keast R Evaluating the effectiveness of interorganisational relations through networks: developing a framework for revised performance measure Public Management Review 2008 10 6 715 31
  12. Lamontagne ME Swaine BR Lavoie A Champagne F Marcotte AC Perceptions of traumatic brain injury network participants about network performance Brain Injury 2010 24 6 812 22
  13. Leggat S Leatt P Cadre d'évaluation du rendement des systèmes de prestation de services de santé intégrée Peformance evaluation of integrated health systems Healthcare Management Forum 1997 10 1 19 26 [in French]
  14. Huxham C Theorizing collaboration practice Public Management Review 2003 5 3 401 23
  15. Provan KG Veazie MA Staten LK Tufel-Shone NI The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnership Public Administration Review 2005 65 5 603 13
  16. Huxham C Vangen S Managing to collaborate: the theory and practice of collaborative advantage 2005 NewYork Routledge
  17. Connolly T Conlon EJ Deutch SJ Organizational effectiveness: a multiple-constituency approach Academy of Management Review 1980 5 2 211 7
  18. Guisset A-L Sicotte C Leclercq P D'Hoore W Définition de la performance hospitalière: une enquiête auprès des divers acteurs stratégiques au sein des hôpitaux Definition of hospital performance: unease in front of the diversity of strategic actors at the hospitals Sciences Sociales et Santé 2002 20 2 65 102 [in French]
  19. Minvielle E Sicotte C Champagne F Contandriopoulos AP Jeantet M Preaubert N Hospital performance: competing or shared values? Health Policy 2008 87 1 8 19
  20. Tregunno D Ross Baker G Barnsley J Murray M Competing values of emergency department performance: balancing multiple stakeholder perspectives Health Services Research 2004 39 4 Pt 1 771 91
  21. Finucane PM Barron SR Davies HA Hadfield-Jones RS Kaigas TM Towards an acceptance of performance assessment Medical Education 2002 36 10 959 64
  22. Gagliardi A Lemieux-Charles L Brown A Sullivan T Goel V Stakeholder preferences for cancer care performance indicators International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 2008 21 2 175 89
  23. Sicotte C Champagne F Contandriopoulos AP Barnsley J Beland F Leggat SG A conceptual framework for the analysis of health care organizations' performance Health Service Management Research 1998 11 1 24 41 discussion-8
  24. Leutz WN Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom The Milbank Quarterly 1999 77 1 77 110 ivߝv
  25. Zinn J Zalokowski A Hunter L Identifying indicators of laboratory management performance: a multiple constituency approach Health Care Management Review 2001 26 1 40 53
  26. Dijk JAGMV Delphi Questionnaires versus groups interviews. A comparison case Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1990 37 293 304
  27. Bryson JM Crosby BC Stone MM The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature Public Administration Review 2006 66 s1 44 55
  28. Gervais M Pépin G TRIAGE: a new group technique gaining recognition in evaluation Evaluation Journal of Australasia 2002 2 2 45 9
  29. Swaine B Dutil E Demers L Gervais M Evaluating Clients' perception of the quality of head in jury rehabilitation services: development and validation of a questionnaire Brain Injury 2000 7 575 87
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.537 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 19, 2010
Accepted on: Nov 1, 2010
Published on: Dec 9, 2010
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2010 Marie-Eve Lamontagne, published by Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.