Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Integrated Community Care Delivered by Public Health Care and Social Care Systems: Protocol for a Realist Synthesis Cover

Integrated Community Care Delivered by Public Health Care and Social Care Systems: Protocol for a Realist Synthesis

Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. Thiam Y, Allaire J-F, Morin P, Hyppolitte S-R, Doré C, Vignon Zomahoun HT, et al. A conceptual framework for integrated community care. Int J Integr Care. 2021; 21(1): 5. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5555
  2. Roeg D, van de Goor I, Garretsen H. Towards quality indicators for assertive outreach programmes for severely impaired substance abusers: concept mapping with Dutch experts. Int J Qual Health Care. 1 juin 2005; 17(3): 2038. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi031
  3. Roeg D, van de Goor I, Garretsen H. Towards Structural Quality Indicators for Intensive Community-Based Care Programmes for Substance Abusers. Community Ment Health J. déc 2008; 44(6): 40515. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-008-9143-x
  4. Larivière C. Les risques de la nouvelle gestion publique pour l’intervention sociale [The risks of the New Public Management to social intervention] [Internet]. Premier congrès international francophone du service social; 2005 juill [cité 16 juin 2020]. Disponible sur: http://www.rrasmq.com/documents/Activites/RN_2010_Les-risques-NGP.pdf.
  5. Levesque J-F, Harris MF, Russell G. Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health. 2013; 12(1): 18. DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-18
  6. Robert É, Ridde V. L’approche réaliste pour l’évaluation de programmes et la revue systématique: De la théorie à la pratique. [The realist approach to programme evaluation and systematic review: From theory to practice] Mes Éval En Éducation. 30 juin 2014; 36(3): 79108. DOI: 10.7202/1025741ar
  7. Ridde V, Robert E, Guichard A, Blaise P. L’approche Realist à l’épreuve du réel de l’évaluation des programmes [Reality check for Realist approach of program evaluation]. Can J Program Eval; 23.
  8. Pawson R. Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective [Internet]. London: Sage; 2006. DOI: 10.4135/9781849209120
  9. Blaise P, Marchal B, Lefèvre P, Kegels G. Au-delà des méthodes expérimentales, l’approche réaliste en évaluation [Beyond experimental methods, the realistic approach in evaluation]. Réduire Inégalités Soc Santé. 1 janv 2010; 28596.
  10. Astbury B, Leeuw FL. Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation. Am J Eval. sept 2010; 31(3): 36381. DOI: 10.1177/1098214010371972
  11. Pawson R. Evidence-based Policy: In Search of a Method. Evaluation. avr 2002; 8(2): 15781. DOI: 10.1177/1358902002008002512
  12. Lacouture A, Breton E, Guichard A, Ridde V. The concept of mechanism from a realist approach: a scoping review to facilitate its operationalization in public health program evaluation. Implement Sci. déc 2015; 10(1): 153. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0345-7
  13. Merton RK. On Sociological Theories of the Middle Range. In: Social Theory and social Structure [Internet]. New York: The Free Press; 1968 [cité 16 juin 2020]. p. 3953. Disponible sur: http://www.csun.edu/~snk1966/Robert%20K%20Merton%20-%20On%20Sociological%20Theories%20of%20the%20Middle%20Range.pdf.
  14. Bouvier A. La théorie sociologique générale comme système hiérarchisé de modèles de portée intermédiaire [General Sociological Theory as a Hierarchical System of Intermediate Scope Models]. Rev Eur Sci Soc. 1 févr 2008; (XLVI–140): 87106.
  15. O’Connor D, Green S, Higgins JP. Defining the Review Question and Developing Criteria for Including Studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, éditeurs. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008 [cité 16 juill 2020]. p. 8194. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9780470712184.ch5. DOI: 10.1002/9780470712184.ch5
  16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 21 juill 2009; 6(7): e1000097. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  17. McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. juill 2016; 75: 406. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
  18. Wilkinson R, Marmot M. Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts. World Health Organization. 2003; 34.
  19. WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, éditeurs. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Commission on Social Determinants of Health final report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Commission on Social Determinants of Health. 2008; 246.
  20. World Health Organization, editor. Adelaide Statement on Health in All Policies: moving towards a shared governance for health and well-being: report from the International Meeting on Health in All Policies, Adelaide 2010. Geneva, Switzerland; Adelaide, S. Aust.: World Health Organization; Government of South Australia; 2010.
  21. Cogliati Dezza MG. Le microaree di Trieste per l’equità [The micro territories of Trieste fo equity]. La comunità che fa salute [The community that promotes health]. 2018 June 14; Trieste, Italy.
  22. Grilli C, Gadini L, Ius A, Marcolongo A. La Dichiarazione di Trieste su la Communità che fa salute [The Trieste Declaration: « The community that promotes health »]. Trieste, Italy; 2018.
  23. Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]. Cochrane Training; 2019 [cité 16 juill 2020]. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current. DOI: 10.1002/9781119536604
  24. Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, Dagenais P, et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inf. 18 déc 2018; 34(4): 28591. DOI: 10.3233/EFI-180221
  25. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. BMC Med. 2013; 11: 21. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-21
  26. Funnell S, Rogers P. Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons; 2011.
  27. Chagnon F, Daigle M, Gervais M-J, Houle J, Béguet V. L’utilisation de l’évaluation fondée sur la théorie du programme comme stratégie d’application des connaissances issues de la recherche [The use of evaluation based on program theory as a research knowledge translation strategy]. Can J Program Eval. 23(1); 332.
  28. Saavedra RQ, Bigras N, Dion J, Doudou K. La production de la théorie du programme dans le cadre d’une évaluation participative : une étude de cas [Generating Program Theory in Participatory Evaluation: A Case Study]. Can J Program Eval Rev Can Éval Programme. 1 déc 2016; 31(2): 13764. DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.339
  29. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist synthesis: an introduction. University of Manchester; 2004 p. 55. (ESRC Research Methods Programme).
  30. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 2009. DOI: 10.1002/9780470743386
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5629 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 21, 2020
Accepted on: Oct 15, 2021
Published on: Oct 26, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Jean-François Allaire, Yacine Thiam, Paul Morin, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Nathalie Rheault, Francis Lacasse, Chantal Doré, Shelley-Rose Hyppolite, Suzanne Garon, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.