Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Impact of Health and Social Care Integration on Children and Young People’s Outcomes: What Can Be Determined from Scotland’s Administrative Data? Cover

The Impact of Health and Social Care Integration on Children and Young People’s Outcomes: What Can Be Determined from Scotland’s Administrative Data?

Open Access
|Nov 2025

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Defined categories for the integration of children’s services into Scotland’s HSCPs.

DEFINED CATEGORY OF INTEGRATIONDESCRIPTION OF CATEGORYNUMBER OF LOCAL AUTHORITY AREAS WITH THIS ARRANGEMENT
Full structural integrationBoth children’s health and social care services integrated into the HSCP alongside adult’s health and social care services10
Partial structural integrationOnly children’s health services integrated into the HSCP alongside adult’s health and social care services9
No structural integrationNeither children’s health nor social care services integrated into the HSCP alongside adult’s health and social care services13
Figure 1

Level of structural integration of children’s services within Scotland’s HSCPs during our period of study to 2021.

Table 2

Association of the level of structural integration (and other contextual factors) with changes in each indicator.

INDICATORINDICATOR APPLIED TO GIRFEC SHANARRI OUTCOMESMEASUREYEARS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF ANALYSISP-VALUE FOR THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE LEVEL OF INTEGRATION AND CHANGES IN THE INDICATORCONTEXTUAL FACTORS FOUND TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH CHANGES IN THE INDICATOR
COVID–19DEPRIVATIONPOPULATION DENSITY
CHILD PROTECTION
Child protection registrations (including pre-birth)SafeRate per 10,0009 (2013-2021).939↓c
Child protection de-registrationsSafeRate per 10,0009 (2013-2021).454
Case conference to child protection registration conversion rate (0-15 years)Safe%9 (2013-2021).010↓c
Children’s Hearings arranged for children for non-offence groundsSafeRate per 10,0009 (2013-2021).257↓c
YOUTH JUSTICE
Children referred to Children’s Reporter on offence groundsSafeRate per 10,00011 (2011-2021).279↓c
Children and young people aged 12 to 20 proceeded againstSafeRate per 10,0006 (2016-2021).063b↓c
‘LOOKED AFTER’ CHILDREN
Children starting to become looked afterSafeRate per 10,00011 (2011-2021).461↓c
Children starting to be looked after at home as proportion of all children becoming looked afterSafe%11 (2011-2021).852↓c
Children ceasing to be looked after (0-15 years)SafeRate per 10,00012 (2010-2021).257
Children aged 0-15 leaving care to return homeSafe%12 (2010-2021).257
Children with 3+ placements in last 12 monthsSafe%12 (2010-2021).010↓c
Looked after school leavers with 1+ qualifications as SCQF level 4Achieving%11 (2011-2021).883
Looked after school leavers with a positive follow-up destinationAchieving%11 (2011-2021).852
School attendance for looked after childrenAchieving%4a (2015-2021).301b
EDUCATION AND EMPLOYABILITY
Unauthorised absence rates of primary school pupilsAchieving% of half days6a (2011-2021).461↓c
Unauthorised absence rates of secondary school pupilsAchieving% of half days6a (2011-2021).131
16-19 year olds not in education, training or employmentAchieving%6 (2016-2021).257b↑c
HEALTH
Teenage pregnancy rate, under-18HealthyRate per 10,00010 (2010-2019).317
Primary 1 children (4-6 years) overweight or obeseHealthy%9 (2011-2019).015
Children (0-17 years) registered with an NHS dentistHealthy%12 (2010-2021).126↓c
27-30 month old children reviewed by health visitorsHealthy%8 (2014-2021).900b↓c
27-30 month old children with a developmental concernHealthy%8 (2014-2021).588b↑c
HOUSING
Children associated with applications assessed as homeless or threatened with homelessnessNurturedRate per 10,00011 (2011-2021).126↓c
Children in temporary accommodationNurturedRate per 10,00012 (2010-2021).852
WORKFORCE
Whole-time equivalent rates for social workers in fieldwork services for childrenN/ARate per 100,00012 (2010-2021).979

[i] a Data published every two years.

b Data for the indicator was only available after integration. The stated p-value represents the evidence of an association between the level of integration and performance on the indicator in the post-integration period (as opposed to changes in the indicator post-integration).

c Higher values seen in the indicator during COVID-19, ↓ c Lower values seen in the indicator during COVID-19, ↑An increase in the contextual factor was associated with an increase in the value of the indicator, ↓An increase in the contextual factor was associated with a decrease in the value of the indicator, – No significant association found between the contextual factor and the indicator.

Figure 2

The conversion rate of case conferences to child protection registrations (for 0-15 year olds).

Table 3

‘Average’ (estimated marginal mean) percentage change for significant results in the period after the integration of children’s services.

INDICATORNO STRUCTURAL INTEGRATIONPARTIAL STRUCTURAL INTEGRATIONFULL STRUCTURAL INTEGRATION
Case conference to child protection registration conversion rate+3.3%+5.8%+1.9%
Looked after children with 3+ placements in last 12 months–1.0%–0.4%+0.2%
Primary 1 children (4–6 years) who are overweight or obese–0.2%+0.7%–0.6%
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.9145 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 17, 2025
Accepted on: Aug 26, 2025
Published on: Nov 26, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Joanna Soraghan, Alexander McTier, Micky Anderson, Carol Ann Anderson, Emma Young, Adrian Bowman, Heather Ottaway, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.