Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring the Link between Novel Task Proceduralization and Motor Simulation Cover

Exploring the Link between Novel Task Proceduralization and Motor Simulation

Open Access
|Sep 2021

References

  1. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617645. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
  2. Brass, M., Liefooghe, B., Braem, S., & De Houwer, J. (2017). Following new task instructions: Evidence for a dissociation between knowing and doing. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 1628. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.012
  3. Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual-mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106113. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
  4. Cole, M. W., Braver, T. S., & Meiran, N. (2017). The task novelty paradox: Flexible control of inflexible neural pathways during rapid instructed task learning. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 415. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.009
  5. Cole, M. W., Laurent, P., & Stocco, A. (2013). Rapid instructed task learning: A new window into the human brain’s unique capacity for flexible cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(1), 122. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-012-0125-7
  6. Cole, M. W., Patrick, L. M., & Braver, T. S. (2018). A role for proactive control in rapid instructed task learning. Acta Psychologica, 184, 2030. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.06.004
  7. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1). DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
  8. Cragg, L., & Nation, K. (2010). Language and the Development of Cognitive Control. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 631642. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01080.x
  9. De Baene, W., & Brass, M. (2014). Dissociating strategy-dependent and independent components in task preparation. Neuropsychologia, 62, 331340. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.015
  10. de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 112. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
  11. Demanet, J., Liefooghe, B., Hartstra, E., Wenke, D., De Houwer, J., & Brass, M. (2016). There is more into ‘doing’ than ‘knowing’: The function of the right inferior frontal sulcus is specific for implementing versus memorising verbal instructions. NeuroImage, 141, 350356. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.059
  12. Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
  13. Everaert, T., Theeuwes, M., Liefooghe, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Automatic Motor Activation by Mere Instruction. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 13001309. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0294-7
  14. Formica, S., González-García, C., & Brass, M. (2020). The effects of declaratively maintaining and proactively proceduralizing novel stimulus-response mappings. Cognition, 201, 104295. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104295
  15. Formica, S., González-García, C., Senoussi, M., & Brass, M. (2021). Neural oscillations track the maintenance and proceduralization of novel instructions. NeuroImage, 232, 117870. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117870
  16. Gabbard, C., Ammar, D., & Cordova, A. (2009). Testing the distinctiveness of visual imagery and motor imagery in a reach paradigm. International Journal of Neuroscience, 119(3), 353365. DOI: 10.1080/00207450802480275
  17. González-García, C., Arco, J. E., Palenciano, A. F., Ramírez, J., & Ruz, M. (2017). Encoding, preparation and implementation of novel complex verbal instructions. NeuroImage, 148, 264273. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.037
  18. González-García, C., Formica, S., Liefooghe, B., & Brass, M. (2020). Attentional prioritization reconfigures novel instructions into action-oriented task sets. Cognition, 194, 104059. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104059
  19. González-García, C., Formica, S., Wisniewski, D., & Brass, M. (2021). Frontoparietal action-oriented codes support novel instruction implementation. NeuroImage, 226, 117608. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117608
  20. Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(3), 377396. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X04000093
  21. Guillot, A., & Collet, C. (2005). Duration of mentally simulated movement: A review. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(1), 1020. DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.37.1.10-20
  22. Hardwick, R. M., Caspers, S., Eickhoff, S. B., & Swinnen, S. P. (2018). Neural correlates of action: Comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 94, 3144. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003
  23. Hartstra, E., Kühn, S., Verguts, T., & Brass, M. (2011). The implementation of verbal instructions: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 32(11), 18111824. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21152
  24. Hartstra, E., Waszak, F., & Brass, M. (2012). The implementation of verbal instructions: Dissociating motor preparation from the formation of stimulus-response associations. NeuroImage, 63(3), 11431153. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.003
  25. Hétu, S., Grégoire, M., Saimpont, A., Coll, M. P., Eugène, F., Michon, P. E., & Jackson, P. L. (2013). The neural network of motor imagery: An ALE meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(5), 930949. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.017
  26. Holm, S. (1979). A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 6570.
  27. Hommel, B. (2000). The Prepared Reflex: Automaticity and Control in Stimulus-Response Translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII (pp. 247273). The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/1481.003.0019
  28. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849878. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
  29. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17(2), 187245. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00034026
  30. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14(1), S103S109. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
  31. Jeannerod, M. (2004). Actions from within. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(4), 376402. DOI: 10.1080/1612197X.2004.9671752
  32. Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 159166. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-007-0170-2
  33. Kompa, N. A., & Mueller, J. L. (2020). How Abstract (Non-embodied) Linguistic Representations Augment Cognitive Control. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1597. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01597
  34. Kunz, B. R., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Thompson, W. B. (2009). Evidence for Motor Simulation in Imagined Locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 14581471. DOI: 10.1037/a0015786
  35. Liefooghe, B., & De Houwer, J. (2018). Automatic effects of instructions do not require the intention to execute these instructions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 108121. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2017.1365871
  36. Liefooghe, B., De Houwer, J., & Wenke, D. (2013). Instruction-based response activation depends on task preparation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 481487. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0374-7
  37. Liefooghe, B., Jim, A., & De Houwer, J. (2021). Automatic effects of covert practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 17470218211007138. DOI: 10.1177/17470218211007138
  38. Liefooghe, B., Wenke, D., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 13251335. DOI: 10.1037/a0028148
  39. Lien, M. C., Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2005). On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: Do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2), 299315. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.299
  40. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 11241140. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.5.1124
  41. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 14231442. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423
  42. Meiran, N., & Cohen-Kdoshay, O. (2012). Working memory load but not multitasking eliminates the prepared reflex: Further evidence from the adapted flanker paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 139(2), 309313. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.008
  43. Meiran, N., Liefooghe, B., & de Houwer, J. (2017). Powerful instructions: Automaticity without practice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 509514. DOI: 10.1177/0963721417711638
  44. Meiran, N., Pereg, M., Kessler, Y., Cole, M. W., & Braver, T. S. (2015a). The power of instructions: Proactive configuration of stimulus–response translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(3), 768786. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000063
  45. Meiran, N., Pereg, M., Kessler, Y., Cole, M. W., & Braver, T. S. (2015b). Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus–response rules: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 365373. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0321-8
  46. Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48(7), 788804. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
  47. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167202. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
  48. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134140. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
  49. Moran, A., & O’Shea, H. (2020). Motor Imagery Practice and Cognitive Processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 394. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00394
  50. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to Action. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory Volume 4 (pp. 118). US: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1
  51. Parsons, L. M. (1994). Temporal and Kinematic Properties of Motor Behavior Reflected in Mentally Simulated Action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 709730. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.709
  52. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-Task Interference in Simple Tasks: Data and Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220244. DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.116.2.220
  53. Ruge, H., & Wolfensteller, U. (2010). Rapid formation of pragmatic rule representations in the human brain during instruction-based learning. Cerebral Cortex, 20(7), 16561667. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp228
  54. Sakai, K. (2008). Task Set and Prefrontal Cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31(1), 219245. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125642
  55. Stevens, J. A. (2005). Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action. Cognition, 95(3), 329350. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.008
  56. Summerfield, C., & De Lange, F. P. (2014). Expectation in perceptual decision making: Neural and computational mechanisms. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(11), 745756. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3838
  57. Theeuwes, M., Liefooghe, B., De Schryver, M., & De Houwer, J. (2018). The role of motor imagery in learning via instructions. Acta Psychologica, 184, 110123. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.002
  58. van’t Wout, F., & Jarrold, C. (2020). The role of language in novel task learning. Cognition, 194, 104036. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104036
  59. van’t Wout, F., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2013). Are stimulus-response rules represented phonologically for task-set preparation and maintenance? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 39(5), 15381551. DOI: 10.1037/a0031672
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.190 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 20, 2021
Accepted on: Sep 13, 2021
Published on: Sep 27, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Ana F. Palenciano, Carlos González-García, Jan de Houwer, Marcel Brass, Baptist Liefooghe, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.