Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Decoding Abilities in Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities: The Contribution of Cognition, Language, and Home Literacy Cover

Decoding Abilities in Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities: The Contribution of Cognition, Language, and Home Literacy

Open Access
|Oct 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Descriptive statistics of participant characteristics and task performances (raw scores) of adolescents with intellectual disability (n = 136).

TESTMSDMINMAX  SKEWNESS  KURTOSIS
Chronological age (months)189.6125.87146239  0.26–1.02
Mental age (months)112.8825.2663190  0.62  0.31
IQ59.439.724088  0.30–0.08
Word recognition timed45.1017.76494  0.03–0.55
Word recognition untimed76.4818.871399–1.02  0.32
Phonological decoding timed23.2811.75255  0.32–0.71
Phonological decoding untimed36.1816.38261–0.40–1.02
Blending15.713.66220–0.94  0.47
Elision9.915.90019  0.12–1.47
46–items18.2614.93043  0.26–1.48
RAN colors68.1622.3833184  1.40  4.15
RAN letters44.2916.3322117  1.50  2.91
Verbal fluency category25.879.35458  0.50  0.73
Verbal fluency letters19.019.95048  0.57–0.25
Vocabulary131.1527.3533179–0.69  0.39
Grammatical comprehension11.164.09218–0.40–0.88
Phonological STM8.422.57318  0.56  1.11
Spatial STM9.912.74218–0.16  0.32
Visual STM9.624.13016–0.81–0.23
Phonological ELWM4.882.01010  0.15–0.40
Visuospatial ELWM6.902.92317  0.95  0.77
Home literacy44.355.852759–0.16–0.10

[i] Note: Abbreviations: ELWM = executive-loaded working memory, STM = short-term memory.

Table 2

Correlations between all variables included in the LASSO regression.

TEST  1  2  3  45  67  8  9  10  11  12  13
1 Decoding  1.00
2 Phonological awareness  0.70  1.00
3 RAN–0.58–0.35  1.00
4 Verbal fluency  0.29  0.27–0.40  1.00
5 Vocabulary  0.11  0.24–0.11  0.321.00
6 Grammatical comprehension  0.27  0.41–0.27  0.400.57  1.00
7 Phonological STM  0.46  0.49–0.23  0.190.11  0.271.00
8 Spatial STM  0.21  0.18–0.25  0.160.12  0.240.24  1.00
9 Visual STM  0.33  0.39–0.44  0.340.30  0.470.26  0.43  1.00
10 Phonological ELWM  0.38  0.51–0.29  0.350.29  0.500.41  0.08  0.35  1.00
11 Visuospatial ELWM  0.23  0.28–0.34  0.280.17  0.310.35  0.46  0.51  0.32  1.00
12 Home literacy  0.01–0.06  0.09–0.040.03–0.170.02–0.12–0.06–0.02–0.09  1.00
13 Mental age  0.27  0.31–0.37  0.300.44  0.450.20  0.22  0.43  0.25  0.42  0.02  1.00
Figure 1

Mean-Square Error (MSE) as a function of lambda. The horizontal dotted line indicates the cross-validation curve. The vertical dotted lines indicate the two lambda values (left: lambda for minimal MSE, right: optimal lambda).

Figure 2

Visualization of coefficients from the LASSO regression. The y-axis indicates the coefficients, and the x-axis indicates the change of lambda value. The upper axis indicates the number of non-zero coefficients at the current lambda. The positive curve represents phonological awareness, and the negative curve represents RAN. The vertical line represents the optimal lambda value.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.191 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 23, 2017
Accepted on: Sep 21, 2021
Published on: Oct 1, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Karin Nilsson, Henrik Danielsson, Åsa Elwér, David Messer, Lucy Henry, Stefan Samuelsson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.