Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evidence Against Novelty-Gated Encoding in Serial Recall Cover

Evidence Against Novelty-Gated Encoding in Serial Recall

Open Access
|Feb 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Serial-position curves for the three conditions of Experiment 1 as predicted by SOB-CS; the condition legend denotes the list composition of dissimilar (D) and similar (S) words. The predictions were generated by simulating 30 participants, with 100 trials per condition and participant, using the standard parameter values (Oberauer et al., 2012), except for the similarities between similar (S) words (set to 0.7 instead of the standard value of 0.65). This change was made so that the predicted main effect of similarity in positions 1, 2, 4, and 5 is approximately as large as in the data of Experiment 1.

Table 1

Words Used in Experiment 1.

WetterRahmenFilterAnlassKarteKostenThekeWeicheKumpelVerband
FensterGrabenSilberBallastKanteMorgenErnteWeizenRummelFestland
RechnerRasenGitterAnlaufFarbeKolbenRennenZeichenKummerTonband
TrefferBratenFingerApplausMarkeKnochenSehneSaitePumpeBestand
BecherRateZifferInlandTasteQuoteRenteLeineMuskelFahrbahn
MesserSahneWinterAtlasPartnerKnotenSteppeReiheTunnelVerdacht

[i] Note: Each column contains six phonologically similar words; words in different columns are phonologically dissimilar.

Figure 2

Observed serial-position curves for the three conditions of Experiment 1. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals for within-subject comparisons (Bakeman & McArthur, 1996).

Figure 3

Serial-position curves for Experiment 2. The condition legend indicates whether the item was the first or second item in its category presented on a list. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals for within-subject comparisons (Bakeman & McArthur, 1996).

Figure 4

Serial-position curves for the four conditions of Experiment 3; the condition legend indicates the number of distractors following each memory item, and the similarity among distractors. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals for within-subject comparisons (Bakeman & McArthur, 1996).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.207 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 4, 2021
Accepted on: Jan 26, 2022
Published on: Feb 8, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Klaus Oberauer, Simon Farrell, Christopher Jarrold, Marcel Niklaus, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.