Staggered Onsets of Processing Relevant and Irrelevant Stimulus Features Produce Different Dynamics of Congruency Effects
By: Herbert Heuer, Christian Seegelke and Peter Wühr
References
- Baldauf, D., & Deubel, H. (2010). Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping. Vision Research, 50, 999–1013. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.02.008
- Bogacz, R., Brown, E., Moehlis, J., Holmes, P., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychological Review, 113, 700–765. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.700
- Brunia, C. H. M., Haagh, S. A. V. M., & Scheirs, J. G. M. (1985).
Waiting to respond: Electrophysiological measurements in man during preparation for a voluntary movement . In: H. Heuer, U. Kleinbeck, & K.-H. Schmidt (Eds.), Motor behavior. programming, control, and acquisition. (pp. 35–78) Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-69749-4_2 - Burle, B., Possamaï, C.-A., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, 324–336. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-002-0105-6
- Burle, B., Spieser, L., Servant, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2014). Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1003–1010. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0561-6
- Burle, B., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005). Dynamics of facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 619–641. DOI: 10.1080/09541440540000121
- De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
- Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
- Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. DOI: 10.3758/BF03203267
- Evans, N. J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). Evidence accumulation models: Current limitations and future directions. Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 16(2), 73–90. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.16.2.p073
- Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2016). Sequential sampling models in cognitive neuroscience: Advantages, applications, and extensions. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 641–666. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645
- Gade, M., Paelecke, M., & Rey-Mermet, A. (2020). Simon Says—On the influence of stimulus arrangement, stimulus material and inner speech habits on the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 1349–1363. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000789
- Gevers, W., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2005). Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 659–673. DOI: 10.1080/09541440540000112
- Hagura, N., Haggard, P., & Diedrichsen, J. (2017). Perceptual decisions are biased by the cost to act. eLife, 6,
e18422 . DOI: 10.7554/eLife.18422 - Heath, R. A. (1984). Random-walk and accumulator models of psychophysical discrimination: a critical evaluation. Perception, 13, 57–65. DOI: 10.1068/p130057
- Heuer, A., Crawford, J. D., & Schubö, A. (2017). Action-relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, 45, 413–427. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-016-0670-3
- Heuer, H. (1981). Über Beanspruchungsänderungen im Verlauf schneller gezielter Bewegungen. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 28, 255–280
- Heuer, H. (1987). Visual discrimination and response programming. Psychological Research, 49, 91–98. DOI: 10.1007/BF00308673
- Heuer, H. (1995). Models for response-response compatibility: The effects of the relation between responses in a choice task. Acta Psychologica, 90, 315–332. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00023-N
- Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261–268. DOI: 10.1007/BF00419656
- Hübner, R., & Mishra, S. (2013). Evidence for strategic suppression of irrelevant activation in the Simon task. Acta Psychologica, 144, 166–172. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.012
- Hübner, R., & Pelzer, T. (2020). Improving parameter recovery for conflict drift-diffusion models. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 1848–1866. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01366-8
- Hübner, R., Steinhauser, M., & Lehle, C. (2010). A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Psychological Review, 117, 759–784. DOI: 10.1037/a0019471
- Hübner, R., & Töbel, L. (2019). Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task. PLoS ONE, 14(3),
e0214203 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214203 - Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility – A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
- Kornblum, S., Stevens, G. T., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus–stimulus and stimulus–response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 688–714. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.3.688
- Lepora, N. F., & Pezzulo, G. (2015). Embodied choice: How action influences perceptual decision making. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(4),
e1004110 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004110 - Leuthold, H. (2011). The Simon effect in cognitive electrophysiology: a short review. Acta Psychologica, 136, 203–211. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.08.001
- Lu, C.-W., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207. DOI: 10.3758/BF03210959
- Mackenzie, I. G., Mittelstädt, V., Ulrich, R., & Leuthold, H. (2022). The role of temporal order of relevant and irrelevant dimensions within conflict tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001032
- Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2003). The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect? Cognition, 88, B1–B10. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00042-8
- McLeod, P. M. (1980).
What can probe RT tell us about attentional demands of movement? In: G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in Motor Behavior. (pp. 579–589). Amsterdam: North-Holland. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61971-8 - Miletić, S., Turner, B. M., Forstmann, B. U., & van Maanen, L. (2017). Parameter recovery for the leaky competing accumulator model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 76, 25–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.12.001
- Miller, J., & Schwarz, W. (2021). Delta plots for conflict tasks: An activation-suppression race model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 1776–1795. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01900-5
- Mittelstädt, V., Miller, J., Leuthold, H., Mackenzie, I. G., & Ulrich, R. (2021). The time-course of distractor-based activation modulates effects of speed-accuracy tradeoffs in conflict tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-02003-x
- Parise, C. V. (2016). Crossmodal correspondences: Standing issues and experimental guidelines. Multisensory Research, 29, 7–28. DOI: 10.1163/22134808-00002502
- Pratte, M. S. (2021). Eriksen flanker delta plot shapes depend on the stimulus. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83, 685–699. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02166-0
- Pratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Feng, C. (2010). Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2013–2025. DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.7.2013
- Proctor, R. W., Miles, J. D., & Baroni, G. (2011). Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 242–266. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0053-5
- Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
- Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
- Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873–922. DOI: 10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420
- Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016). Diffusion decision model: current issues and history. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 260–281. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007
- Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 438–481. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196302
- Ren, P., Nicholls, M. E., Ma, Y. Y., & Chen, L. (2011). Size matters: Non-numerical magnitude affects the spatial coding of response. PLoS One, 6(8),
e23553 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023553 - Richter, M., & Wühr, P. (2022). The nature of associations between physical stimulus size and left-right response codes. Journal of Cognition, 5, 1–18. DOI: 10.5334/joc.206
- Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002).
Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses . In: B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance XIX (pp. 494–519). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. - Schonard, C., Heed, T., & Seegelke, C. (2022). Allocation of visuospatial attention indexes evidence accumulation for reach decisions. bioRxiv. DOI: 10.1101/2022.05.06.490925
- Selen, L. P. J., Shadlen, M. N., & Wolpert, D. M. (2012). Deliberation in the motor system: reflex gains track evolving evidence leading to a decision. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 2276–2286. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5273-11.2012
- Servant, M., Logan, G. D., Gajdos, T., & Evans, N. J. (2021). An integrated theory of deciding and acting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150, 2435–2454. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001063
- Servant, M., White, C., Montagnini, A., & Burle, B. (2015). Using covert response activation to test latent assumptions of formal decision-making models in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 10371–10385. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0078-15.2015
- Shushruth, S., Zylberberg, A., & Shadlen, M. N. (2022). Sequential sampling from memory underlies action selection during abstract decision-making. Current Biology, 32, 1949–1960. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.03.014
- Simon, J. R. (1969). Reaction toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 1974–1976. DOI: 10.1037/h0027448
- Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Mewaldt, S. P., & Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 16–22. DOI: 10.3758/BF03199380
- Smith, P. L., & Ratcliff, R. (2004). Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends in Neurosciences, 27, 161–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.01.006
- Speckman, P. L., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Pratte, M. S. (2008). Delta plots and coherent distribution ordering. The American Statistician, 62, 262–266. DOI: 10.1198/000313008X333493
- Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 971–995. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7
- Steinemann, N. A., Stine, G. M., Trautmann, E. M., Zylberberg, A., Wolpert, D. M., & Shadlen, M. N. (2022). Direct observation of the neural computations underlying a single decision. bioRxiv. DOI: 10.1101/2022.05.02.490321
- Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. DOI: 10.1037/h0054651
- Töbel, L., Hübner, R., & Stürmer, B. (2014). Suppression of irrelevant activation in the horizontal and vertical Simon task differs quantitatively not qualitatively. Acta Psychologica, 152, 47–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.07.007
- Ulrich, R., Schröter, H., Leuthold, H., & Birngruber, T. (2015). Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 148–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.005
- Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550–592. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.550
- Vallesi, A., Mapelli, D., Schiff, S., Amodio, P., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: Different underlying mechanisms? Cognition, 96, B33–B43. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.009
- Van den Wildenberg, W. P., Wylie, S. A., Forstmann, B. U., Burle, B., Hasbroucq, T., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2010). To head or to heed? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition: a review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 222. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00222
- Verdonck, S., Loossens, T., & Philiastides, M. G. (2021). The Leaky Integrating Threshold and its impact on evidence accumulation models of choice response time (RT). Psychological Review, 128, 203–221. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000258
- Verdonck, S., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2016). Factoring out nondecision time in choice reaction time data: Theory and implications. Psychological Review, 123, 208–218. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000019
- Voss, A., Nagler, M., & Lerche, V. (2013). Diffusion models in experimental psychology. Experimental Psychology, 60, 385–402. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000218
- Wagenmakers, E. J., & Brown, S. (2007). On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review, 114, 830–841. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.830
- Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
- White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2011). Diffusion models of the flanker task: Discrete versus gradual attentional selection. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 210–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.08.001
- White, C. N., Servant, M., & Logan, G. D. (2017). Testing the validity of conflict drift-diffusion models for use in estimating cognitive processes: A parameter-recovery study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 286–301. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1271-2
- Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: eidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 453–464. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.453
- Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2007). Response coding in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 71, 401–410. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0027-1
- Wühr, P., & Biebl, R. (2011). The role of working memory in spatial S-R correspondence effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 442–454. DOI: 10.1037/a0020563
- Wühr, P., & Heuer, H. (2017). Response preparation, response conflict, and the effects of irrelevant flanker stimuli. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 13, 70–82. DOI: 10.5709/acp-0208-3
- Wühr, P., & Heuer, H. (2018). The impact of anatomical and spatial distance between responses on response conflict. Memory & Cognition, 46, 994–1009. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0817-5
- Wühr, P., & Heuer, H. (2020). To respond or not to respond? A model-based comparison between the processing of go, nogo, and neutral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46, 525–549. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000731
- Wühr, P., & Heuer, H. (2022). Mapping effects in choice-response and go/nogo variants of the lexical-decision task: A case for polarity correspondence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 491–507. DOI: 10.1177/17470218211043860
- Wühr, P., & Seegelke, C. (2018). Compatibility between physical stimulus size and left-right responses: small is left and large is right. Journal of Cognition, 1, 1–17. DOI: 10.5334/joc.19
- Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1997). Distributional analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber’s (1994) dual-process model of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1543–1551. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.5.1543
- Zorzi, M., & Umiltá, C. (1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 193–205. DOI: 10.1007/BF00419634
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.252 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: May 11, 2022
Accepted on: Nov 25, 2022
Published on: Jan 13, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
© 2023 Herbert Heuer, Christian Seegelke, Peter Wühr, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.