The Accumulated Clues Task (ACT): Development of a German Semantic Problem-Solving Paradigm

Charlotte S. Löffler; Sascha Topolinski

doi:10.5334/joc.254

The Accumulated Clues Task (ACT): Development of a German Semantic Problem-Solving Paradigm

Journal of Cognition

Volume 6 (2023): Issue 1

By: Charlotte S. Löffler and Sascha Topolinski

Open Access

|Jan 2023

Abstract

The Accumulated Clues Task (ACT; Bowers et al., 1990) is a semantic problem-solving paradigm that has primarily been used in research on intuitive processes and as an experimental model of insight. In this incremental task, participants are instructed to find a solution word that is implied by a list of clue words with increasing semantic proximity to the solution word. We present a German version of the ACT, consisting of 20 word lists with 15 clues each, and report norming studies testing its psychometric properties and their relations to psycholinguistic features of the stimulus material (total N = 300). The results are reported and discussed for future research employing this stimulus pool, which can be easily adapted to varying experimental set-ups and research questions.

References

Arthur, A. Z. (1964). Queens norms for responses to 100 words from the Kent-Rosanoff Word Association Test: Studies in word association and meaning. National Research Council.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Batchelder, W. H., & Alexander, G. E. (2012). Insight problem solving: A critical examination of the possibility of formal theory. The Journal of Problem Solving, 5(1), 56–100. DOI: 10.7771/1932-6246.1143
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bolte, A., & Goschke, T. (2005). On the speed of intuition: Intuitive judgments of semantic coherence under different response deadlines. Memory & Cognition, 33(7), 1248–1255. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193226
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003a). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 730–737. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196539
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003b). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 634–639. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195543
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bowden, E. M., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J., & Kounios, J. (2005). New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 322–328. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.012
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bowers, K. S., Farvolden, P., & Mermigis, L. (1995). Intuitive antecedents of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 27–51). The MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., & Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 72–110. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(90)90004-N
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1): 16, 1–38. DOI: 10.5334/joc.72
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dorfman, J., Shames, V. A., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996). Intuition, incubation, and insight: Implicit cognition in problem solving. In G. D. M. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 257–296). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523109.003.0007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). When familiarity breeds accuracy: Cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 276–290. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.276
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hodgkinson, G. P., Langan-Fox, J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2008). Intuition: A fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural sciences. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 1–27. DOI: 10.1348/000712607X216666
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Inquisit 5 [Computer software]. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.millisecond.com.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kent, G. H., & Rosanoff, A. J. (1910). A study of association in insanity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 67(1), 37–96. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.67.1.37
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiefer, M., Weisbrod, M., Kern, I., Maier, S., & Spitzer, M. (1998). Right hemisphere activation during indirect semantic priming: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 64(3), 377–408. DOI: 10.1006/brln.1998.1979
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2000). Conscious and unconscious metacognition: A rejoinder. Consciousness and Cognition, 9(2), 193–202. DOI: 10.1006/ccog.2000.0436
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Langan-Fox, J., & Shirley, D. A. (2003). The nature and measurement of intuition: Cognitive and behavioral interests, personality, and experiences. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 207–222. DOI: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&;3_11
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McNamara, T. P. (2005). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. Psychology Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McNamara, T. P., & Healy, A. F. (1988). Semantic, phonological, and mediated priming in reading and lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 398–409. DOI: 10.1006/brln.1997.1829
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232. DOI: 10.1037/h0048850
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 238–246. DOI: 10.3758/BF03197722
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Öllinger, M., & von Müller, A. (2017). Search and coherence-building in intuition and insight problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 827. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00827
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Plaut, D. C., & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 107(4), 786–823. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.4.786
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reber, R., Ruch-Monachon, M. A., & Perrig, W. J. (2007). Decomposing intuitive components in a conceptual problem solving task. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(2), 294–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.05.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rodd, J. M. (2020). Settling into semantic space: An ambiguity-focused account of word-meaning access. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 411–427. DOI: 10.1177/174569161988586
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roediger, H. L., McDermott, K. B., & Robinson, K. J. (1998). The role of associative processes in creating false memories. In M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & C. Cornolde (Eds.), Theories of memory, 2, pp. 187–245. Psychology Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier Academic Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schacter, D. L. (1999). The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54(3), 182–203. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.182
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shirley, D. A., & Langan-Fox, J. (1996). Intuition: A review of the literature. Psychological Reports, 79(2), 563-584. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.2.563
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Spitzer, M., Braun, U., Maier, S., Hermle, L., & Maher, B. A. (1993). Indirect semantic priming in schizophrenic patients. Schizophrenia Research, 11(1), 71–80. DOI: 10.1016/0920-9964(93)90040-p
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stegt, S. J. (2006). Die Rolle impliziter assoziativer Reaktionen bei der Entstehung von Pseudoerinnerungen im DRM-Paradigma [the role of implicit associative responses in the generation of pseudomemories in the DRM paradigm]. Logos.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2005). With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory: Mood and the false memory effect. Psychological Science, 16(10), 785–791. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01615.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Topolinski, S., & Deutsch, R. (2013). Phasic affective modulation of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 414–436. DOI: 10.1037/a0028879
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010). Gaining insight into the “Aha” experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 402–405. DOI: 10.1177/0963721410388803
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009a). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence. Cognition and Emotion, 23(8), 1465–1503. DOI: 10.1080/02699930802420745
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009b). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 39–63. DOI: 10.1037/a0014678
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009c). Scanning the “fringe” of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(3), 608–618. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.06.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Damme, I. (2013). Mood and the DRM paradigm: An investigation of the effects of valence and arousal on false memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(6), 1060–1081. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.727837
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vaughan, F. E. (1979). Awakening intuition. Anchor Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Webb, M. E., Little, D. R., & Cropper, S. J. (2016). Insight is not in the problem: Investigating insight in problem solving across task types. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1424. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01424
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wilson VanVoorhis, C. R., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43–50. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zander, T., Öllinger, M., & Volz, K. G. (2016). Intuition and insight: Two processes that build on each other or fundamentally differ? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1395. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01395
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article