Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Accumulated Clues Task (ACT): Development of a German Semantic Problem-Solving Paradigm Cover

The Accumulated Clues Task (ACT): Development of a German Semantic Problem-Solving Paradigm

Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. Arthur, A. Z. (1964). Queens norms for responses to 100 words from the Kent-Rosanoff Word Association Test: Studies in word association and meaning. National Research Council.
  2. Batchelder, W. H., & Alexander, G. E. (2012). Insight problem solving: A critical examination of the possibility of formal theory. The Journal of Problem Solving, 5(1), 56100. DOI: 10.7771/1932-6246.1143
  3. Bolte, A., & Goschke, T. (2005). On the speed of intuition: Intuitive judgments of semantic coherence under different response deadlines. Memory & Cognition, 33(7), 12481255. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193226
  4. Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003a). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 730737. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196539
  5. Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003b). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 634639. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195543
  6. Bowden, E. M., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J., & Kounios, J. (2005). New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 322328. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.012
  7. Bowers, K. S., Farvolden, P., & Mermigis, L. (1995). Intuitive antecedents of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 2751). The MIT Press.
  8. Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., & Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 72110. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(90)90004-N
  9. Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1): 16, 138. DOI: 10.5334/joc.72
  10. Dorfman, J., Shames, V. A., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996). Intuition, incubation, and insight: Implicit cognition in problem solving. In G. D. M. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 257296). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523109.003.0007
  11. Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). When familiarity breeds accuracy: Cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 276290. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.276
  12. Hodgkinson, G. P., Langan-Fox, J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2008). Intuition: A fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural sciences. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 127. DOI: 10.1348/000712607X216666
  13. Inquisit 5 [Computer software]. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.millisecond.com.
  14. Kent, G. H., & Rosanoff, A. J. (1910). A study of association in insanity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 67(1), 3796. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.67.1.37
  15. Kiefer, M., Weisbrod, M., Kern, I., Maier, S., & Spitzer, M. (1998). Right hemisphere activation during indirect semantic priming: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 64(3), 377408. DOI: 10.1006/brln.1998.1979
  16. Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2000). Conscious and unconscious metacognition: A rejoinder. Consciousness and Cognition, 9(2), 193202. DOI: 10.1006/ccog.2000.0436
  17. Langan-Fox, J., & Shirley, D. A. (2003). The nature and measurement of intuition: Cognitive and behavioral interests, personality, and experiences. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 207222. DOI: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&;3_11
  18. McNamara, T. P. (2005). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. Psychology Press.
  19. McNamara, T. P., & Healy, A. F. (1988). Semantic, phonological, and mediated priming in reading and lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 398409. DOI: 10.1006/brln.1997.1829
  20. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220232. DOI: 10.1037/h0048850
  21. Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 238246. DOI: 10.3758/BF03197722
  22. Öllinger, M., & von Müller, A. (2017). Search and coherence-building in intuition and insight problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 827. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00827
  23. Plaut, D. C., & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 107(4), 786823. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.4.786
  24. Reber, R., Ruch-Monachon, M. A., & Perrig, W. J. (2007). Decomposing intuitive components in a conceptual problem solving task. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(2), 294309. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.05.004
  25. Rodd, J. M. (2020). Settling into semantic space: An ambiguity-focused account of word-meaning access. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 411427. DOI: 10.1177/174569161988586
  26. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803814. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
  27. Roediger, H. L., McDermott, K. B., & Robinson, K. J. (1998). The role of associative processes in creating false memories. In M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & C. Cornolde (Eds.), Theories of memory, 2, pp. 187245. Psychology Press.
  28. Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier Academic Press.
  29. Schacter, D. L. (1999). The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54(3), 182203. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.182
  30. Shirley, D. A., & Langan-Fox, J. (1996). Intuition: A review of the literature. Psychological Reports, 79(2), 563-584. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.2.563
  31. Spitzer, M., Braun, U., Maier, S., Hermle, L., & Maher, B. A. (1993). Indirect semantic priming in schizophrenic patients. Schizophrenia Research, 11(1), 7180. DOI: 10.1016/0920-9964(93)90040-p
  32. Stegt, S. J. (2006). Die Rolle impliziter assoziativer Reaktionen bei der Entstehung von Pseudoerinnerungen im DRM-Paradigma [the role of implicit associative responses in the generation of pseudomemories in the DRM paradigm]. Logos.
  33. Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2005). With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory: Mood and the false memory effect. Psychological Science, 16(10), 785791. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01615.x
  34. Topolinski, S., & Deutsch, R. (2013). Phasic affective modulation of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 414436. DOI: 10.1037/a0028879
  35. Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010). Gaining insight into the “Aha” experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 402405. DOI: 10.1177/0963721410388803
  36. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009a). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence. Cognition and Emotion, 23(8), 14651503. DOI: 10.1080/02699930802420745
  37. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009b). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 3963. DOI: 10.1037/a0014678
  38. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009c). Scanning the “fringe” of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(3), 608618. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.06.002
  39. Van Damme, I. (2013). Mood and the DRM paradigm: An investigation of the effects of valence and arousal on false memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(6), 10601081. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.727837
  40. Vaughan, F. E. (1979). Awakening intuition. Anchor Press.
  41. Webb, M. E., Little, D. R., & Cropper, S. J. (2016). Insight is not in the problem: Investigating insight in problem solving across task types. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1424. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01424
  42. Wilson VanVoorhis, C. R., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 4350. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043
  43. Zander, T., Öllinger, M., & Volz, K. G. (2016). Intuition and insight: Two processes that build on each other or fundamentally differ? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1395. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01395
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.254 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: May 19, 2022
Accepted on: Dec 6, 2022
Published on: Jan 10, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Charlotte S. Löffler, Sascha Topolinski, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.