Anticipatory Saccades Towards the Future Consequences of One’s Actions – an Online Eye Tracking Study
By: Florian Gouret and Christina U. Pfeuffer
References
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Del Popolo Cristaldi, F., Granziol, U., Bariletti, I., Borella, E., & Mento, G. (2022). Doing experimental psychological research in pandemic time: how alerting differently impacts online vs. lab settin. Europe PMC. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/cn3dj
- Dignath, D., & Janczyk, M. (2017). Anticipation of delayed action-effects: learning when an effect occurs, without knowing what this effect will be. Psychological Research, 81(5), 1072–1083. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0797-7
- Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Eder, A. B., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Representing the hyphen in action–effect associations: Automatic acquisition and bidirectional retrieval of action–effect intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1701–1712. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000022
- Dutzi, I. B., & Hommel, B. (2009). The microgenesis of action-effect binding. Psychological Research, 73(3), 425–435. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0161-7
- Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 229–240. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229
- Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 138–154. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8
- Elsner, B., Hommel, B., Mentschel, C., Drzezga, A., Prinz, W., Conrad, B., & Siebner, H. (2002). Linking Actions and Their Perceivable Consequences in the Human Brain. NeuroImage, 17(1), 364–372. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1162
- Gouret, F., & Pfeuffer, C. U. (2021). Learning to expect and monitor the future: How fast do anticipatory saccades toward future action consequences emerge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(7), 992–1008. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000924
- Gouret, F., & Pfeuffer, C. U. (under review/preprint). One-shot learning of proactive effect monitoring: Temporally-distinct attention allocation towards future action outcomes. Preprint available online on ResearchGate.
- Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should We Trust Web-Based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions About Internet Questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93
- Halekoh, U., & Højsgaard, S. (2014). A kenward-roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models–the R package pbkrtest. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(9), 1–30. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v059.i09
- Hoffmann, J. (2003). Anticipatory Behavioral Control. Anticipatory Behavior in Adaptive Learning Systems, 44–65. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45002-3_4
- Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73(4), 512–526. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0234-2
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral And Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- Innes, R. J., Evans, N. J., Howard, Z. L., Eidels, A., & Brown, S. D. (2020). A Broader Application of the Detection Response Task to Cognitive Tasks and Online Environments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 63(5), 896–909. DOI: 10.1177/0018720820936800
- James, W. (1981). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original work published 1890).
- Johansen, S. A., San Agustin, J., Skovsgaard, H., Hansen, J. P., & Tall, M. (2011). Low cost vs. high-end eye tracking for usability testing. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI EA ’11. DOI: 10.1145/1979742.1979744
- Kenward, B. (2010). 10-month-olds visually anticipate an outcome contingent on their own action. Infancy, 15(4), 337–361. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00018.x
- Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997). Small Sample Inference for Fixed effects from Restricted Maximum Likelihood. Biometrics, 53(3), 983. DOI: 10.2307/2533558
- Koch, I., & Kunde, W. (2002). Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 30(8), 1297–1303. DOI: 10.3758/BF03213411
- Kumle, L., Võ, M. L. H., & Draschkow, D. (2021). Estimating power in (generalized) linear mixed models: An open introduction and tutorial in R. Behavior Research Methods, 53(6), 2528–2543. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01546-0
- Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 387–394. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.387
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13). DOI: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
- Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M. (2018). Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, AKA Least-squares Means. R Package Version 1.1. 3; 2018.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans - Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 297–326. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
- Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P. C. D., & Schielzeth, H. (2017). The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 14(134), 20170213. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0213
- Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
- Reimers, S., & Stewart, N. (2015). Presentation and response timing accuracy in Adobe Flash and HTML5/JavaScript Web experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 309–327. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0471-1
- Papoutsaki, A., Laskey, J., & Huang, J. (2017). SearchGazer: Webcam Eye Tracking for Remote Studies of Web Search. Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction Retrieval (CHIIR). DOI: 10.1145/3020165.3020170
- Pfeuffer, C. U., Kiesel, A., & Huestegge, L. (2016). A look into the future: Spontaneous anticipatory saccades reflect processes of anticipatory action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(11), 1530–1547. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000224
- Pfeuffer, C. U., Kiesel, A., & Huestegge, L. (2022). Similar proactive effect monitoring in free and forced choice action modes. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01644-4
- Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., Wirth, R., Dignath, D., & Kunde, W. (2014). Thinking with portals: Revisiting kinematic cues to intention. Cognition, 133(2), 464–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.012
- Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., & Melcher, T. (2010). Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations. Acta Psychologica, 135(3), 316–322. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.08.006
- Pfister, R., Pfeuffer, C. U., & Kunde, W. (2014). Perceiving by proxy: Effect-based action control with unperceivable effects. Cognition, 132(3), 251–261. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.012
- Pfister, R., Weller, L., Dignath, D., & Kunde, W. (2017). What or when? The impact of anticipated social action effects is driven by action-effect compatibility, not delay. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1371-0
- Semmelmann, K., & Weigelt, S. (2016). Online psychophysics: reaction time effects in cognitive experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1241–1260. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0783-4
- Semmelmann, K., & Weigelt, S. (2018). Online webcam-based eye tracking in cognitive science: A first look. Behavior Research Methods, 50(2), 451–465. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0913-7
- Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological bulletin, 136(6), 943-974. DOI: 10.1037/a0020541
- Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., & Aust, F. (2015). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. R package version 0.13–145.
- Sun, D., Custers, R., Marien, H., & Aarts, H. (2020). Ideomotor Action: Evidence for Automaticity in Learning, but Not Execution. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00185
- Szumilas, M. (2010). Explaining odds ratios. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19(3), 227–229. Retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20842279 - Wickham, H. (2016).
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis . Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 - Wirth, R., Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2015). Through the portal: effect anticipation in the central bottleneck. Acta Psychologica, 160, 141–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.261 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 19, 2022
Accepted on: Jan 13, 2023
Published on: Feb 10, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2023 Florian Gouret, Christina U. Pfeuffer, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.