Now you see it, now you don’t - Cognitive skills and their contributions to mathematics across early development
References
- Abrahamse, E., Van Dijck, J. P., & Fias, W. (2016). How does working memory enable number-induced spatial biases? Frontiers in Psychology, 7(JUN),
977 . DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00977 - Allan, N. P., Hume, L. E., Allan, D. M., Farrington, A. L., & Lonigan, C. J. (2014). Relations between inhibitory control and the development of academic skills in preschool and kindergarten: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50(10), 2368–2379. DOI: 10.1037/A0037493
- Andersson, U. (2008). Working memory as a predictor of written arithmetical skills in children: The importance of central executive functions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 181–203. DOI: 10.1348/000709907X209854
- Ashkenazi, S., & Silverman, S. (2017). Multiple skills underlie arithmetic performance: A large-scale structural equation modeling analysis. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3(2), 496–515. DOI: 10.5964/JNC.V3I2.64
- Atit, K., Power, J. R., Pigott, T., Lee, J., Geer, E. A., Uttal, D. H., Ganley, C. M., & Sorby, S. A. (2021). Examining the relations between spatial skills and mathematical performance: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(3), 699–720. DOI: 10.3758/S13423-021-02012-W
- Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8(4), 485.
http://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1995-04539-001.html . DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.485 - Barth, H., La Mont, K., Lipton, J., Dehaene, S., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E. (2006). Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children. Cognition, 98(3), 199–222. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.011
- Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H. (2010). A Developmental Perspective on Executive Function. Child Development, 81(6), 1641–1660. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x
- Boaler, J., Chen, L., Williams, C., & Cordero, M. (2016). Seeing as Understanding: The Importance of Visual Mathematics for our Brain and Learning. Journal of Applied & Computational Mathematics, 05(05). DOI: 10.4172/2168-9679.1000325
- Brucki, S. M. D., & Nitrini, R. (2008). Cancellation task in very low educated people. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 23(2), 139–147. DOI: 10.1016/J.ACN.2007.11.003
- Bull, R., & Lee, K. (2014). Executive Functioning and Mathematics Achievement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(1), 36–41. DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12059
- Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19(3), 273–293. DOI: 10.1207/S15326942DN1903_3
- Castronovo, J., & Göbel, S. M. (2012). Impact of High Mathematics Education on the Number Sense. Plos One, 7(4),
e33832 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033832 - Cavdaroglu, S., & Knops, A. (2016). Mental subtraction and multiplication recruit both phonological and visuospatial resources: evidence from a symmetric dual-task design. Psychological Research, 80(4), 608–624. DOI: 10.1007/S00426-015-0667-8
- Coolen, I. E. J. I., & Castronovo, J. (2023). How memory counts in mathematical development. Journal of Cognition. DOI: 10.5334/joc.248
- Coolen, I. E. J. I., Riggs, K. J., Bugler, M., & Castronovo, J. (2022). The approximate number system and mathematics achievement: it’s complicated. A thorough investigation of different ANS measures and executive functions in mathematics achievement in children. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2022.2044338
- Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63–68. DOI: 10.1016/J.TINE.2013.12.001
- De Smedt, B. (2022). Individual differences in mathematical cognition: a Bert’s eye view. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 46,
101175 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101175 - De Smedt, B., Janssen, R., Bouwens, K., Verschaffel, L., Boets, B., & Ghesquière, P. (2009). Working memory and individual differences in mathematics achievement: a longitudinal study from first grade to second grade. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(2), 186–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.004
- De Visscher, A., & Noël, M. P. (2014). The detrimental effect of interference in multiplication facts storing: Typical development and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2380–2400. DOI: 10.1037/XGE0000029
- Dehaene, S. (2011). The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics, Revised and Updated Edition (Updated Ed). Oxford University Press.
http://files/1271/the-number-sense-9780199753871.html - Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56(2), 384–398. DOI: 10.1016/J.NEURON.2007.10.004
- Feigenson, L., Libertus, M. E., & Halberda, J. (2013). Links Between the Intuitive Sense of Number and Formal Mathematics Ability. Child Development Perspectives, 7(2), 74–79. DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12019
- Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2014). Spatial Associations in Numerical Cognition—From Single Digits to Arithmetic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1461–1483. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.927515
- Friso-Van den Bos, I., Van der Ven, S. H., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. (2013). Working memory and mathematics in primary school children: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 10, 29–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.003
- Fuhs, M. W., & McNeil, N. M. (2013). ANS acuity and mathematics ability in preschoolers from low-income homes: Contributions of inhibitory control. Developmental science, 16(1), 136–148. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12013
- Geary, D. C., Nicholas, A., Li, Y., & Sun, J. (2017). Developmental change in the influence of domain-general abilities and domain-specific knowledge on mathematics achievement: An eight-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 680–693. DOI: 10.1037/edu0000159
- Gilmore, C., Attridge, N., & Inglis, M. (2011). Measuring the approximate number system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 64(11), 2099–2109. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.574710
- Gilmore, C., Attridge, N., Clayton, S., Cragg, L., Johnson, S., Marlow, N., … & Inglis, M. (2013). Individual differences in inhibitory control, not non-verbal number acuity, correlate with mathematics achievement. PloS one, 8(6),
e67374 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067374 - Gilmore, C., Keeble, S., Richardson, S., & Cragg, L. (2015). The role of cognitive inhibition in different components of arithmetic. Zdm,
2010 . DOI: 10.1007/s11858-014-0659-y - Gimbert, F., Camos, V., Gentaz, E., & Mazens, K. (2019). What predicts mathematics achievement? Developmental change in 5- and 7-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 178, 104–120. DOI: 10.1016/J.JECP.2018.09.013
- Goffin, C., & Ansari, D. (2016). Beyond magnitude: Judging ordinality of symbolic number is unrelated to magnitude comparison and independently relates to individual differences in arithmetic. Cognition, 150, 68–76. DOI: 10.1016/J.COGNITION.2016.01.018
- Gold, A. B., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Cirino, P., Fuchs, L. S., Stuebing, K. K., & Fletcher, J. M. (2013). Cognitive and behavioral attention in children with math difficulties. Child Neuropsychology, 19(4), 420–437. DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2012.690371
- Grégoire, J., Noel, M., & Nieuwenhoven, C. (2003). Tedi-Math: A Test for Diagnostic Assessment of Mathematical Disabilities.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jacques-Gregoire/publication/289707936_Tedi-math_a_test_for_diagnostic_assessment_of_mathematical_Disabilities/links/5af31a840f7e9b026bc7e831/Tedi-math-a-test-for-diagnostic-assessment-of-mathematical-Disabilities - Guida, A., Abrahamse, E., & van Dijck, J. P. (2020). About the interplay between internal and external spatial codes in the mind: implications for serial order. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1477(1), 20–33. DOI: 10.1111/NYAS.14341
- Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: The role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1229–1241. DOI: 10.1037/A0027433
- Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the “Number Sense”: The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1457–1465. DOI: 10.1037/a0012682
- Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455(7213), 665–U62. DOI: 10.1038/nature07246
- Harrison, X. A., Donaldson, L., Correa-Cano, M. E., Evans, J., Fisher, D. N., Goodwin, C. E., … & Inger, R. (2018). A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology. PeerJ, 6,
e4794 - Hawes, Z. C. K., & Ansari, D. (2020). What explains the relationship between spatial and mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27(3), 465–482. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01694-7
- Hawes, Z. C. K., Gilligan-Lee, K. A., & Mix, K. S. (2022). Effects of spatial training on mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 58(1),
112 . DOI: 10.1037/DEV0001281 - Holmes, J., & Adams, J. W. (2006). Working memory and children’s mathematical skills: Implications for mathematical development and mathematics curricula. Educational Psychology, 26(3), 339–366. DOI: 10.1080/01443410500341056
- Holmes, J., Adams, J. W., & Hamilton, C. J. (2008). The relationship between visuospatial sketchpad capacity and children’s mathematical skills. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 272–289. DOI: 10.1080/09541440701612702
- Inglis, M., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Indexing the approximate number system. Acta Psychologica, 145, 147–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.009
- Iuculano, T., Tang, J., Hall, C. W. B., & Butterworth, B. (2008). Core information processing deficits in developmental dyscalculia and low numeracy. Developmental Science, 11(5), 669–680. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00716.x
- Judd, N., & Klingberg, T. (2021). Training spatial cognition enhances mathematical learning in a randomized study of 17,000 children. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(11), 1548–1554. DOI: 10.1038/S41562-021-01118-4
- Katz, C., Hoesterey, H., & Knops, A. (2017). A Role for Attentional Reorienting During Approximate Multiplication and Division. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3(2), 246–269. DOI: 10.5964/JNC.V3I2.62
- Keller, L., & Libertus, M. (2015). Inhibitory control may not explain the link between approximation and math abilities in kindergarteners from middle class families. Frontiers in Psychology, 6,
685 . DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00685 - Knops, A. (2018). Neurocognitive Evidence for Spatial Contributions to Numerical Cognition. Heterogeneity of Function in Numerical Cognition, 211–232. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811529-9.00011-X
- Knops, A., Thirion, B., Hubbard, E. M., Michel, V., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science, 324(5934), 1583–1585. DOI: 10.1126/science.1171599
- Knops, A., Viarouge, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: Evidence from the operational momentum effect. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 71(4), 803–821. DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.4.803
- Krajcsi, A., Lengyel, G., & Kojouharova, P. (2016). The source of the symbolic numerical distance and size effects. Frontiers in psychology, 7,
1795 . DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01795 - Lee, K., & Lee, H. W. (2019). Inhibition and Mathematical Performance: Poorly Correlated, Poorly Measured, or Poorly Matched? Child Development Perspectives, 13(1), 28–33. DOI: 10.1111/CDEP.12304
- Libertus, M. E., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2013). Numerical approximation abilities correlate with and predict informal but not formal mathematics abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(4), 829–838. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.003
- Liu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2022). Spatial skills and counting sequence knowledge: Investigating reciprocal longitudinal relations in early years. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 59, 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.09.013
- Lourenco, S. F., Bonny, J. W., Fernandez, E. P., & Rao, S. (2012). Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(46), 18737–18742. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1207212109
- Lyons, I. M., Price, G. R., Vaessen, A., Blomert, L., & Ansari, D. (2014). Numerical predictors of arithmetic success in grades 1-6. Developmental Science, 17(5), 714–726. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12152
- McCrink, K., & de Hevia, M. D. (2018). From innate spatial biases to enculturated spatial cognition: The case of spatial associations in number and other sequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(MAR),
415 . DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00415 - McKenzie, B., Bull, R., & Gray, C. (2003). The effects of phonological and visual-spatial interference on children’s arithmetical performance. Educational and Child Psychology, 20(3), 93–108. DOI: 10.53841/bpsecp.2003.20.3.93
- Mix, K. S., Levine, S. C., Cheng, Y. L., Young, C., Hambrick, D. Z., Ping, R., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2016). Separate but correlated: The latent structure of space and mathematics across development. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(9), 1206–1227. DOI: 10.1037/XGE0000182
- Mueller, S. T., & Esposito, A. G. (2014). Computerized Testing Software for Assessing Interference Suppression in Children and Adults: The Bivalent Shape Task (BST). Journal of Open Research Software, 2(1),
e3 . DOI: 10.5334/jors.ak - Mueller, S. T., & Piper, B. J. (2014). The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 250–259. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.024
- Park, J., Bermudez, V., Roberts, R. C., & Brannon, E. M. (2016). Non-symbolic approximate arithmetic training improves math performance in preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 278–293. DOI: 10.1016/J.JECP.2016.07.011
- Park, J., & Brannon, E. M. (2013). Training the approximate number system improves math proficiency. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2013–2019. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613482944
- Park, J., & Brannon, E. M. (2014). Improving arithmetic performance with number sense training: an investigation of underlying mechanism. Cognition, 133(1), 188–200. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.011
- Passolunghi, M. C., & Lanfranchi, S. (2012). Domain-specific and domain-general precursors of mathematical achievement: a longitudinal study from kindergarten to first grade. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(Pt 1), 42–63. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02039.x
- Peng, P., Lin, X., Ünal, Z. E., Lee, K., Namkung, J., Chow, J., & Sales, A. (2020). Examining the mutual relations between language and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(7), 595–634. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000231
- Pinheiro-Chagas, P., Wood, G., Knops, A., Krinzinger, H., Lonnemann, J., Starling-Alves, I., … & Haase, V. G. (2014). In how many ways is the approximate number system associated with exact calculation? PloS one, 9(11),
e111155 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111155 - Pinheiro-Chagas, P., Didino, D., Haase, V. G., Wood, G., & Knops, A. (2018). The developmental trajectory of the operational momentum effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JUL),
1062 . DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01062 - Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. DOI: 10.1080/00335558008248231
- Programme d’enseignement de l’école maternelle. (2019). Ministère de l’Education Nationale et de La Jeunesse.
https://www.education.gouv.fr/bo/15/Special2/MENE1504759A.htm#ecole - Programmes et horaires à l’école élémentaire. (2019). Ministère de l’Education Nationale et de La Jeunesse.
https://www.education.gouv.fr/programmes-et-horaires-l-ecole-elementaire-9011 - R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
https://www.R-project.org/ - Raghubar, K. P., Barnes, M. A., Dennis, M., Cirino, P. T., Taylor, H., & Landry, S. (2015). Neurocognitive predictors of mathematical processing in school-aged children with spina bifida and their typically developing peers: Attention, working memory, and fine motor skills. Neuropsychology, 29(6), 861–873. DOI: 10.1037/neu0000196
- Rey-Mermet, A., Gade, M., & Oberauer, K. (2018). Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 44(4), 501–526. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000450
- Reynvoet, B., & Sasanguie, D. (2016). The symbol grounding problem revisited: A thorough evaluation of the ANS mapping account and the proposal of an alternative account based on symbol–symbol associations. Frontiers in psychology, 7,
1581 . DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01581 - RStudio Team. (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC.
http://www.rstudio.com/ - Rueda, M. R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Halparin, J. D., Gruber, D. B., Lercari, L. P., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42(8), 1029–1040. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.012
- Schwartz, F., Zhang, Y., Chang, H., Karraker, S., Kang, J. B., & Menon, V. (2021). Neural representational similarity between symbolic and non-symbolic quantities predicts arithmetic skills in childhood but not adolescence. Developmental Science, 24(6),
e13123 . DOI: 10.1111/desc.13123 - Szkudlarek, E., & Brannon, E. M. (2017). Does the approximate number system serve as a foundation for symbolic mathematics? Language Learning and Development, 13(2), 171–190. DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1263573
- van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03
- van Galen, M. S., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Developing access to number magnitude: A study of the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101(2), 99–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.05.001
- Vanbinst, K., Ghesquière, P., & De Smedt, B. (2012). Numerical Magnitude Representations and Individual Differences in Children’s Arithmetic Strategy Use. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(3), 129–136. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2012.01148.x
- Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2005). Interacting neighbors: A connectionist model of retrieval in single-digit multiplication. Mem Cogn 33, 1–16. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195293
- White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in medicine, 30(4), 377–399. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4067
- Wijns, N., De Smedt, B., Verschaffel, L., & Torbeyns, J. (2020). Are preschoolers who spontaneously create patterns better in mathematics? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 753–769. DOI: 10.1111/BJEP.12329
- Wood, G., Willmes, K., … H. N.-P. science, & 2008, U. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(4), 489–525.
https://www.academia.edu/download/46286387/On_the_cognitive_link_between_space_and_20160606-24636-lu1n8x.pdf - Xie, F., Zhang, L., Chen, X., & Xin, Z. (2019). Is Spatial Ability Related to Mathematical Ability: a Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 113–155. DOI: 10.1007/S10648-019-09496-Y
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.309 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 9, 2022
Accepted on: Jul 17, 2023
Published on: Jul 31, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2023 Ilse Elise Johanna Ingrid Coolen, Sixtine Omont-Lescieux, André Knops, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.