Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sequential Effects on Reaction Time Distributions: Commonalities and Differences Across Paradigms Cover

Sequential Effects on Reaction Time Distributions: Commonalities and Differences Across Paradigms

By: Anne Voormann and  Jeff Miller  
Open Access
|Sep 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Schematic representation of an accumulation process towards the correct response in a four-parameter diffusion model with v as drift rate towards the boundary for a correct response, w the relative starting point of the accumulation process, a representing the boundary separation, and t0 the time for stimulus encoding and response execution. The distribution on the upper boundary represents the RT distribution of correct responses and the distribution on the lower boundary depicts the RT distribution of errors.

Table 1

Summary across paradigms and stimulus types of sequential effects on response time (RT) and proportion of correct responses (PC).

MAMRΔ95% CIMAMRΔ95% CI
VS COLORVS FORM
RT52447944.7[36.3;53.1]6456422.4[–6.0;10.8]
PC.978.993.015[.008;.021].930.949.019[.008;.030]
2CRT
RT58455636.6[28.0;45.2]
PC.955.969.013[.006;.020]
INT CONGRUENTINT INCONGRUENT
RT57556213.5[9.0;17.9]6086025.6[1.1;10.1]
PC.961.961–.0002[–.005;.004].940.950.010[.003;.017]
TS COLORTS FORM
RT712608103.6[85.3;121.8]78869791.6[74.0;109.1]
PC.931.980.048[.038;.059].937.958.021[.012;.031]

[i] Note. VS = visual search paradigm; 2CRT = 2CRT paradigm; Int = interference paradigm; TS = task-switching paradigm; CI = confidence interval.

Figure 2

Mean response time (mean RT) in ms for repetition and alternation trials separately for each stimulus type of the four paradigms.

Figure 3

Vincentized response time (RT) per quantile for repetition and alternation trials separately per paradigm and stimulus type.

Figure 4

Relative frequency histograms of the pooled observed reaction time (RT) percentiles for repetition and alternation trials separately per paradigm and stimulus type.

Table 2

Ex-Gaussian distribution: Mean (M) parameter estimates for alternation (A) and repetition (R) trials, their difference (Δ), and the respective effect size with 95%-confidence interval of the standardized effects for all parameters within each paradigm and stimulus type.

MAMRΔdZ[LOW;UP]MAMRΔdZ[LOW;UP]
VS COLORVS FORM
µ41539321.40.42[0.32;0.51]45444212.00.21[0.12;0.31]
σ22202.10.15[–0.22;0.52]29226.30.32[–0.07;0.7]
τ1138726.00.46[0.3;0.62]200209–9.10.08[0;0.17]
2CRT
µ42338636.50.73[0.59;0.86]
σ42338.60.72[0.43;1.02]
τ100103–2.70.06[–0.05;0.18]
INT CONGRUENTINT INCONGRUENT
µ44243012.00.18[0.13;0.23]4654614.10.06[0.02;0.11]
σ37342.60.17[–0.07;0.41]44431.10.06[–0.15;0.27]
τ1331311.80.02[–0.06;0.11]1401390.80.01[–0.06;0.08]
TS COLORTS FORM
µ49744849.20.76[0.62;0.91]53148347.50.66[0.53;0.79]
σ42375.10.19[–0.18;0.56]55541.20.07[–0.25;0.39]
τ20916049.40.53[0.38;0.69]25521144.00.45[0.31;0.58]

[i] Note. Significant differences are highlighted using bold font. VS = visual search paradigm; 2CRT = 2CRT paradigm; Int = interference paradigm; TS = task-switching paradigm.

Table 3

EZ model: Mean (M) parameter estimates for alternation (A) and repetition (R) trials for all parameters within each paradigm and stimulus type as well as the respective effect size with 95%-confidence interval of the standardized effects.

MAMRdZ[LOW;UP]MAMRdZ[LOW;UP]
VS COLORVS FORM
a1.8422.2140.35[0.01;0.68]1.5281.6550.16[–0.11;0.43]
v3.9134.8810.64[0.34;0.94]2.2652.4070.2[0.02;0.39]
t00.2880.2430.46[0.19;0.72]0.3380.3150.22[–0.01;0.45]
w0.4960.4990.45[0.08;0.82]0.490.4910.06[–0.24;0.36]
2CRT
a1.1351.1920.2[0.07;0.34]
v3.033.2190.28[0.07;0.48]
t00.3390.30.64[0.47;0.81]
w0.5050.4991.08[0.59;1.56]
INT CONGRUENTINT INCONGRUENT
a1.3931.3320.09[–0.04;0.21]1.2481.2730.05[–0.07;0.17]
v2.9232.8750.06[–0.11;0.23]2.5682.6740.16[0.01;0.31]
t00.330.3220.08[–0.03;0.18]0.3680.3610.07[–0.06;0.19]
w0.5020.5020.08[–0.23;0.39]0.5060.5050.21[–0.01;0.44]
TS COLORTS FORM
a1.4271.6880.52[0.24;0.81]1.5911.5880.01[–0.16;0.18]
v2.0212.7981.2[0.95;1.45]1.8722.1990.67[0.47;0.88]
t00.3790.2970.94[0.65;1.24]0.390.3440.59[0.37;0.81]
w0.5060.50.93[0.56;1.30]0.5030.5030.03[–0.29;0.35]

[i] Note. Significant differences are highlighted using bold font. VS = visual search paradigm; 2CRT = 2CRT paradigm; Int = interference paradigm; TS = task-switching paradigm.

Table 4

Four-parameter diffusion model: Mean (M) parameter estimates for alternation (A) and repetition (R) trials for all parameters within each paradigm and stimulus type as well as the respective effect size with 95%-confidence interval of the standardized effects.

MAMRdZ[LOW;UP]MAMRdZ[LOW;UP]
VS COLORVS FORM
a1.82.210.46[0.16;0.76]1.481.60.21[–0.06;0.48]
v3.74.650.73[0.45;1]2.042.10.08[–0.09;0.25]
t00.340.320.47[0.25;0.68]0.380.370.06[–0.09;0.21]
w0.580.630.32[0.04;0.59]0.560.60.33[0.09;0.57]
2CRT
a1.471.390.36[0.15;0.57]
v4.123.890.25[0.07;0.43]
t00.290.280.17[–0.01;0.35]
w0.320.41.11[0.76;1.46]
INT CONGRUENTINT INCONGRUENT
a1.51.430.15[–0.06;0.36]1.431.450.06[–0.08;0.2]
v3.393.390[–0.11;0.11]3.133.270.16[0.01;0.31]
t00.330.330.11[0;0.22]0.340.330.06[–0.07;0.19]
w0.430.420.05[–0.1;0.2]0.390.390.01[–0.17;0.19]
TS COLORTS FORM
a1.511.750.49[0.2;0.78]1.711.70.01[–0.22;0.24]
v2.43.171.03[0.82;1.23]2.232.60.61[0.4;0.82]
t00.370.320.93[0.72;1.14]0.360.330.6[0.32;0.87]
w0.430.460.4[0.08;0.72]0.420.420.02[–0.26;0.3]

[i] Note. Significant differences are highlighted using bold font. VS = visual search paradigm; 2CRT = 2CRT paradigm; Int = interference paradigm; TS = task-switching paradigm.

Table 5

Seven-parameter diffusion model: Mean (M) parameter estimates for alternation (A) and repetition (R) trials for all parameters within each paradigm and stimulus type as well as the respective effect size with 95%-confidence interval of the standardized effects.

MAMRdZ[LOW;UP]MAMRdZ[LOW;UP]
VS COLORVS FORM
a1.451.610.23[–0.08;0.54]1.381.490.22[–0.01;0.44]
v3.625.221.08[0.65;1.51]2.312.340.02[–0.24;0.28]
t00.350.330.45[0.27;0.64]0.380.380.05[–0.13;0.23]
w0.670.650.11[–0.18;0.39]0.640.670.19[–0.04;0.43]
σv0.561.190.63[0.24;1.01]0.660.630.03[–0.28;0.33]
σt0 0.080.070.36[0.08;0.64]0.120.120.02[–0.22;0.25]
σw0.190.190.05[–0.33;0.42]0.240.250.12[–0.25;0.5]
2CRT
a1.441.310.33[0.14;0.53]
v5.935.360.49[0.11;0.87]
t00.280.270.11[–0.05;0.27]
w0.290.421.49[0.94;2.03]
σv1.81.70.11[–0.17;0.4]
σt00.120.120.12[–0.18;0.42]
σw0.10.130.27[–0.1;0.65]
INT CONGRUENTINT INCONGRUENT
a1.421.410.03[–0.18;0.24]1.391.460.13[–0.03;0.28]
v4.714.820.07[–0.23;0.37]4.465.080.38[0.13;0.63]
t00.320.310.16[–0.01;0.32]0.320.320.07[–0.06;0.2]
w0.410.40.07[–0.19;0.34]0.370.350.14[–0.09;0.37]
σv1.461.50.03[–0.25;0.3]1.371.690.22[0.01;0.44]
σt00.120.110.09[–0.16;0.35]0.140.140.02[–0.22;0.26]
σw0.120.120[–0.37;0.38]0.110.120.1[–0.23;0.43]
TS COLORTS FORM
a1.631.860.38[0.08;0.68]1.851.830.03[–0.19;0.26]
v3.895.040.69[0.32;1.05]3.534.110.37[0.07;0.66]
t00.340.30.69[0.44;0.93]0.340.30.56[0.31;0.8]
w0.380.440.48[0.11;0.84]0.380.370.08[–0.22;0.38]
σv1.611.710.08[–0.25;0.42]1.41.410[–0.29;0.29]
σt00.140.140.04[–0.31;0.38]0.150.150.05[–0.27;0.37]
σw0.10.140.48[0.12;0.83]0.110.110.08[–0.29;0.44]

[i] Note. Significant differences are highlighted using bold font. VS = visual search paradigm; 2CRT = 2CRT paradigm; Int = interference paradigm; TS = task-switching paradigm.

Table 6

Results of the χ2-test computed jointly for alternation and repetition trials as well as from the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test computed separately for alternation and repetition trials for each paradigm, stimulus type, and model.

χ2(99)(P)DA(P)DR(P)χ2(99)(P)DA(P)DR(P)
VS COLORVS FORM
ExGauss136(.008)0.0179(.056)0.0177(.056)108(.246)0.0072(.919)0.0077(.912)
EZ185(< .001)0.0341(< .001)0.034(< .001)127(.029)0.0113(.444)0.0121(.412)
Diff4175(< .001)0.0274(< .001)0.0269(.001)114(.143)0.0085(.789)0.0091(.768)
Diff7100(.467)0.0092(.729)0.009(.744)109(.232)0.0062(.979)0.0069(.958)
2CRT
ExGauss184(<.001)0.011(.001)0.0111(.001)
EZ1494(< .001)0.0252(< .001)0.0256(< .001)
Diff4299(< .001)0.0228(< .001)0.0232(< .001)
Diff7244(< .001)0.0151(< .001)0.0153(< .001)
INT CONGRUENTINT INCONGRUENT
ExGauss103(.371)0.0038(.973)0.0038(.974)123(.051)0.004(.959)0.0039(.967)
EZ139(.005)0.0081(.251)0.0079(.266)155(< .001)0.0072(.378)0.0073(.362)
Diff4117(.101)0.0085(.204)0.0083(.211)138(.006)0.0086(.187)0.0086(.186)
Diff7112(.170)0.0075(.331)0.0074(.338)131(.018)0.0069(.425)0.0069(.436)
TS COLORTS FORM
ExGauss196(< .001)0.0124(.015)0.0124(.015)110(.219)0.0028(>.999)0.003(.999)
EZ344(< .001)0.0268(< .001)0.0267(< .001)128(.027)0.0083(.227)0.0083(.231)
Diff4250(< .001)0.0175(< .001)0.0175(< .001)142(.003)0.0119(.023)0.0123(.018)
Diff7127(.032)0.0039(.972)0.0039(.969)120(.072)0.0075(.332)0.0076(.325)

[i] Note. VS = visual search paradigm; 2CRT = 2CRT paradigm; Int = interference paradigm; TS = task-switching paradigm; ExGauss = ex-Gaussian distribution; EZ = EZ-diffusion model; Diff4 = four-parameter diffusion model, Diff7 = seven-parameter diffusion model.

Figure A1

Quantile-quantile plots of the predicted and observed percentile ranks (RTpr) separately for each model – the ex-Gaussian (ExGauss), the EZ model (EZ), the four-parameter diffusion model (Diff 4), and the seven-parameter diffusion model (Diff 7) – for (a) the color (top) and form (bottom) targets of the visual search paradigm and (b) the 2CRT paradigm.

Figure A2

Quantile-Quantile plots of the predicted and observed percentile ranks (RTpr) separately for each model – the ex-Gaussian (ExGauss), the EZ model (EZ), the four-parameter diffusion model (Diff 4), and the seven-parameter diffusion model (Diff 7) – for (a) the congruent (top) and incongruent (bottom) stimuli of the interference paradigm and (b) the color (top) and form (bottom) task of the task-switching paradigm.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.395 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 21, 2023
Accepted on: Aug 17, 2024
Published on: Sep 3, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Anne Voormann, Jeff Miller, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.