
Figure 1
Schematic representation of an accumulation process towards the correct response in a four-parameter diffusion model with v as drift rate towards the boundary for a correct response, w the relative starting point of the accumulation process, a representing the boundary separation, and t0 the time for stimulus encoding and response execution. The distribution on the upper boundary represents the RT distribution of correct responses and the distribution on the lower boundary depicts the RT distribution of errors.
Table 1
Summary across paradigms and stimulus types of sequential effects on response time (RT) and proportion of correct responses (PC).
| MA | MR | Δ | 95% CI | MA | MR | Δ | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VS COLOR | VS FORM | |||||||
| RT | 524 | 479 | 44.7 | [36.3;53.1] | 645 | 642 | 2.4 | [–6.0;10.8] |
| PC | .978 | .993 | .015 | [.008;.021] | .930 | .949 | .019 | [.008;.030] |
| 2CRT | ||||||||
| RT | 584 | 556 | 36.6 | [28.0;45.2] | ||||
| PC | .955 | .969 | .013 | [.006;.020] | ||||
| INT CONGRUENT | INT INCONGRUENT | |||||||
| RT | 575 | 562 | 13.5 | [9.0;17.9] | 608 | 602 | 5.6 | [1.1;10.1] |
| PC | .961 | .961 | –.0002 | [–.005;.004] | .940 | .950 | .010 | [.003;.017] |
| TS COLOR | TS FORM | |||||||
| RT | 712 | 608 | 103.6 | [85.3;121.8] | 788 | 697 | 91.6 | [74.0;109.1] |
| PC | .931 | .980 | .048 | [.038;.059] | .937 | .958 | .021 | [.012;.031] |
[i] Note. VS = visual search paradigm; 2CRT = 2CRT paradigm; Int = interference paradigm; TS = task-switching paradigm; CI = confidence interval.

Figure 2
Mean response time (mean RT) in ms for repetition and alternation trials separately for each stimulus type of the four paradigms.

Figure 3
Vincentized response time (RT) per quantile for repetition and alternation trials separately per paradigm and stimulus type.

Figure 4
Relative frequency histograms of the pooled observed reaction time (RT) percentiles for repetition and alternation trials separately per paradigm and stimulus type.
Table 2
Ex-Gaussian distribution: Mean (M) parameter estimates for alternation (A) and repetition (R) trials, their difference (Δ), and the respective effect size with 95%-confidence interval of the standardized effects for all parameters within each paradigm and stimulus type.
| MA | MR | Δ | dZ | [LOW;UP] | MA | MR | Δ | dZ | [LOW;UP] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VS COLOR | VS FORM | |||||||||
| µ | 415 | 393 | 21.4 | 0.42 | [0.32;0.51] | 454 | 442 | 12.0 | 0.21 | [0.12;0.31] |
| σ | 22 | 20 | 2.1 | 0.15 | [–0.22;0.52] | 29 | 22 | 6.3 | 0.32 | [–0.07;0.7] |
| τ | 113 | 87 | 26.0 | 0.46 | [0.3;0.62] | 200 | 209 | –9.1 | 0.08 | [0;0.17] |
| 2CRT | ||||||||||
| µ | 423 | 386 | 36.5 | 0.73 | [0.59;0.86] | |||||
| σ | 42 | 33 | 8.6 | 0.72 | [0.43;1.02] | |||||
| τ | 100 | 103 | –2.7 | 0.06 | [–0.05;0.18] | |||||
| INT CONGRUENT | INT INCONGRUENT | |||||||||
| µ | 442 | 430 | 12.0 | 0.18 | [0.13;0.23] | 465 | 461 | 4.1 | 0.06 | [0.02;0.11] |
| σ | 37 | 34 | 2.6 | 0.17 | [–0.07;0.41] | 44 | 43 | 1.1 | 0.06 | [–0.15;0.27] |
| τ | 133 | 131 | 1.8 | 0.02 | [–0.06;0.11] | 140 | 139 | 0.8 | 0.01 | [–0.06;0.08] |
| TS COLOR | TS FORM | |||||||||
| µ | 497 | 448 | 49.2 | 0.76 | [0.62;0.91] | 531 | 483 | 47.5 | 0.66 | [0.53;0.79] |
| σ | 42 | 37 | 5.1 | 0.19 | [–0.18;0.56] | 55 | 54 | 1.2 | 0.07 | [–0.25;0.39] |
| τ | 209 | 160 | 49.4 | 0.53 | [0.38;0.69] | 255 | 211 | 44.0 | 0.45 | [0.31;0.58] |
[i] Note. Significant differences are highlighted using bold font. VS = visual search paradigm; 2CRT = 2CRT paradigm; Int = interference paradigm; TS = task-switching paradigm.
Table 3
EZ model: Mean (M) parameter estimates for alternation (A) and repetition (R) trials for all parameters within each paradigm and stimulus type as well as the respective effect size with 95%-confidence interval of the standardized effects.
| MA | MR | dZ | [LOW;UP] | MA | MR | dZ | [LOW;UP] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VS COLOR | VS FORM | |||||||
| a | 1.842 | 2.214 | 0.35 | [0.01;0.68] | 1.528 | 1.655 | 0.16 | [–0.11;0.43] |
| v | 3.913 | 4.881 | 0.64 | [0.34;0.94] | 2.265 | 2.407 | 0.2 | [0.02;0.39] |
| t0 | 0.288 | 0.243 | 0.46 | [0.19;0.72] | 0.338 | 0.315 | 0.22 | [–0.01;0.45] |
| w | 0.496 | 0.499 | 0.45 | [0.08;0.82] | 0.49 | 0.491 | 0.06 | [–0.24;0.36] |
| 2CRT | ||||||||
| a | 1.135 | 1.192 | 0.2 | [0.07;0.34] | ||||
| v | 3.03 | 3.219 | 0.28 | [0.07;0.48] | ||||
| t0 | 0.339 | 0.3 | 0.64 | [0.47;0.81] | ||||
| w | 0.505 | 0.499 | 1.08 | [0.59;1.56] | ||||
| INT CONGRUENT | INT INCONGRUENT | |||||||
| a | 1.393 | 1.332 | 0.09 | [–0.04;0.21] | 1.248 | 1.273 | 0.05 | [–0.07;0.17] |
| v | 2.923 | 2.875 | 0.06 | [–0.11;0.23] | 2.568 | 2.674 | 0.16 | [0.01;0.31] |
| t0 | 0.33 | 0.322 | 0.08 | [–0.03;0.18] | 0.368 | 0.361 | 0.07 | [–0.06;0.19] |
| w | 0.502 | 0.502 | 0.08 | [–0.23;0.39] | 0.506 | 0.505 | 0.21 | [–0.01;0.44] |
| TS COLOR | TS FORM | |||||||
| a | 1.427 | 1.688 | 0.52 | [0.24;0.81] | 1.591 | 1.588 | 0.01 | [–0.16;0.18] |
| v | 2.021 | 2.798 | 1.2 | [0.95;1.45] | 1.872 | 2.199 | 0.67 | [0.47;0.88] |
| t0 | 0.379 | 0.297 | 0.94 | [0.65;1.24] | 0.39 | 0.344 | 0.59 | [0.37;0.81] |
| w | 0.506 | 0.5 | 0.93 | [0.56;1.30] | 0.503 | 0.503 | 0.03 | [–0.29;0.35] |
[i] Note. Significant differences are highlighted using bold font. VS = visual search paradigm; 2CRT = 2CRT paradigm; Int = interference paradigm; TS = task-switching paradigm.
Table 4
Four-parameter diffusion model: Mean (M) parameter estimates for alternation (A) and repetition (R) trials for all parameters within each paradigm and stimulus type as well as the respective effect size with 95%-confidence interval of the standardized effects.
| MA | MR | dZ | [LOW;UP] | MA | MR | dZ | [LOW;UP] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VS COLOR | VS FORM | |||||||
| a | 1.8 | 2.21 | 0.46 | [0.16;0.76] | 1.48 | 1.6 | 0.21 | [–0.06;0.48] |
| v | 3.7 | 4.65 | 0.73 | [0.45;1] | 2.04 | 2.1 | 0.08 | [–0.09;0.25] |
| t0 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.47 | [0.25;0.68] | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.06 | [–0.09;0.21] |
| w | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.32 | [0.04;0.59] | 0.56 | 0.6 | 0.33 | [0.09;0.57] |
| 2CRT | ||||||||
| a | 1.47 | 1.39 | 0.36 | [0.15;0.57] | ||||
| v | 4.12 | 3.89 | 0.25 | [0.07;0.43] | ||||
| t0 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.17 | [–0.01;0.35] | ||||
| w | 0.32 | 0.4 | 1.11 | [0.76;1.46] | ||||
| INT CONGRUENT | INT INCONGRUENT | |||||||
| a | 1.5 | 1.43 | 0.15 | [–0.06;0.36] | 1.43 | 1.45 | 0.06 | [–0.08;0.2] |
| v | 3.39 | 3.39 | 0 | [–0.11;0.11] | 3.13 | 3.27 | 0.16 | [0.01;0.31] |
| t0 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.11 | [0;0.22] | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.06 | [–0.07;0.19] |
| w | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.05 | [–0.1;0.2] | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.01 | [–0.17;0.19] |
| TS COLOR | TS FORM | |||||||
| a | 1.51 | 1.75 | 0.49 | [0.2;0.78] | 1.71 | 1.7 | 0.01 | [–0.22;0.24] |
| v | 2.4 | 3.17 | 1.03 | [0.82;1.23] | 2.23 | 2.6 | 0.61 | [0.4;0.82] |
| t0 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.93 | [0.72;1.14] | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.6 | [0.32;0.87] |
| w | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.4 | [0.08;0.72] | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.02 | [–0.26;0.3] |
[i] Note. Significant differences are highlighted using bold font. VS = visual search paradigm; 2CRT = 2CRT paradigm; Int = interference paradigm; TS = task-switching paradigm.
Table 5
Seven-parameter diffusion model: Mean (M) parameter estimates for alternation (A) and repetition (R) trials for all parameters within each paradigm and stimulus type as well as the respective effect size with 95%-confidence interval of the standardized effects.
| MA | MR | dZ | [LOW;UP] | MA | MR | dZ | [LOW;UP] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VS COLOR | VS FORM | |||||||
| a | 1.45 | 1.61 | 0.23 | [–0.08;0.54] | 1.38 | 1.49 | 0.22 | [–0.01;0.44] |
| v | 3.62 | 5.22 | 1.08 | [0.65;1.51] | 2.31 | 2.34 | 0.02 | [–0.24;0.28] |
| t0 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.45 | [0.27;0.64] | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.05 | [–0.13;0.23] |
| w | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.11 | [–0.18;0.39] | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.19 | [–0.04;0.43] |
| σv | 0.56 | 1.19 | 0.63 | [0.24;1.01] | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.03 | [–0.28;0.33] |
| 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.36 | [0.08;0.64] | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.02 | [–0.22;0.25] | |
| σw | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.05 | [–0.33;0.42] | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.12 | [–0.25;0.5] |
| 2CRT | ||||||||
| a | 1.44 | 1.31 | 0.33 | [0.14;0.53] | ||||
| v | 5.93 | 5.36 | 0.49 | [0.11;0.87] | ||||
| t0 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.11 | [–0.05;0.27] | ||||
| w | 0.29 | 0.42 | 1.49 | [0.94;2.03] | ||||
| σv | 1.8 | 1.7 | 0.11 | [–0.17;0.4] | ||||
| 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | [–0.18;0.42] | |||||
| σw | 0.1 | 0.13 | 0.27 | [–0.1;0.65] | ||||
| INT CONGRUENT | INT INCONGRUENT | |||||||
| a | 1.42 | 1.41 | 0.03 | [–0.18;0.24] | 1.39 | 1.46 | 0.13 | [–0.03;0.28] |
| v | 4.71 | 4.82 | 0.07 | [–0.23;0.37] | 4.46 | 5.08 | 0.38 | [0.13;0.63] |
| t0 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.16 | [–0.01;0.32] | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.07 | [–0.06;0.2] |
| w | 0.41 | 0.4 | 0.07 | [–0.19;0.34] | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.14 | [–0.09;0.37] |
| σv | 1.46 | 1.5 | 0.03 | [–0.25;0.3] | 1.37 | 1.69 | 0.22 | [0.01;0.44] |
| 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.09 | [–0.16;0.35] | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.02 | [–0.22;0.26] | |
| σw | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0 | [–0.37;0.38] | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.1 | [–0.23;0.43] |
| TS COLOR | TS FORM | |||||||
| a | 1.63 | 1.86 | 0.38 | [0.08;0.68] | 1.85 | 1.83 | 0.03 | [–0.19;0.26] |
| v | 3.89 | 5.04 | 0.69 | [0.32;1.05] | 3.53 | 4.11 | 0.37 | [0.07;0.66] |
| t0 | 0.34 | 0.3 | 0.69 | [0.44;0.93] | 0.34 | 0.3 | 0.56 | [0.31;0.8] |
| w | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.48 | [0.11;0.84] | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.08 | [–0.22;0.38] |
| σv | 1.61 | 1.71 | 0.08 | [–0.25;0.42] | 1.4 | 1.41 | 0 | [–0.29;0.29] |
| 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.04 | [–0.31;0.38] | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.05 | [–0.27;0.37] | |
| σw | 0.1 | 0.14 | 0.48 | [0.12;0.83] | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.08 | [–0.29;0.44] |
[i] Note. Significant differences are highlighted using bold font. VS = visual search paradigm; 2CRT = 2CRT paradigm; Int = interference paradigm; TS = task-switching paradigm.
Table 6
Results of the χ2-test computed jointly for alternation and repetition trials as well as from the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test computed separately for alternation and repetition trials for each paradigm, stimulus type, and model.
| χ2(99)(P) | DA(P) | DR(P) | χ2(99)(P) | DA(P) | DR(P) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VS COLOR | VS FORM | |||||
| ExGauss | 136(.008) | 0.0179(.056) | 0.0177(.056) | 108(.246) | 0.0072(.919) | 0.0077(.912) |
| EZ | 185(< .001) | 0.0341(< .001) | 0.034(< .001) | 127(.029) | 0.0113(.444) | 0.0121(.412) |
| Diff4 | 175(< .001) | 0.0274(< .001) | 0.0269(.001) | 114(.143) | 0.0085(.789) | 0.0091(.768) |
| Diff7 | 100(.467) | 0.0092(.729) | 0.009(.744) | 109(.232) | 0.0062(.979) | 0.0069(.958) |
| 2CRT | ||||||
| ExGauss | 184(<.001) | 0.011(.001) | 0.0111(.001) | |||
| EZ | 1494(< .001) | 0.0252(< .001) | 0.0256(< .001) | |||
| Diff4 | 299(< .001) | 0.0228(< .001) | 0.0232(< .001) | |||
| Diff7 | 244(< .001) | 0.0151(< .001) | 0.0153(< .001) | |||
| INT CONGRUENT | INT INCONGRUENT | |||||
| ExGauss | 103(.371) | 0.0038(.973) | 0.0038(.974) | 123(.051) | 0.004(.959) | 0.0039(.967) |
| EZ | 139(.005) | 0.0081(.251) | 0.0079(.266) | 155(< .001) | 0.0072(.378) | 0.0073(.362) |
| Diff4 | 117(.101) | 0.0085(.204) | 0.0083(.211) | 138(.006) | 0.0086(.187) | 0.0086(.186) |
| Diff7 | 112(.170) | 0.0075(.331) | 0.0074(.338) | 131(.018) | 0.0069(.425) | 0.0069(.436) |
| TS COLOR | TS FORM | |||||
| ExGauss | 196(< .001) | 0.0124(.015) | 0.0124(.015) | 110(.219) | 0.0028(>.999) | 0.003(.999) |
| EZ | 344(< .001) | 0.0268(< .001) | 0.0267(< .001) | 128(.027) | 0.0083(.227) | 0.0083(.231) |
| Diff4 | 250(< .001) | 0.0175(< .001) | 0.0175(< .001) | 142(.003) | 0.0119(.023) | 0.0123(.018) |
| Diff7 | 127(.032) | 0.0039(.972) | 0.0039(.969) | 120(.072) | 0.0075(.332) | 0.0076(.325) |
[i] Note. VS = visual search paradigm; 2CRT = 2CRT paradigm; Int = interference paradigm; TS = task-switching paradigm; ExGauss = ex-Gaussian distribution; EZ = EZ-diffusion model; Diff4 = four-parameter diffusion model, Diff7 = seven-parameter diffusion model.

Figure A1
Quantile-quantile plots of the predicted and observed percentile ranks () separately for each model – the ex-Gaussian (ExGauss), the EZ model (EZ), the four-parameter diffusion model (Diff 4), and the seven-parameter diffusion model (Diff 7) – for (a) the color (top) and form (bottom) targets of the visual search paradigm and (b) the 2CRT paradigm.

Figure A2
Quantile-Quantile plots of the predicted and observed percentile ranks (RTpr) separately for each model – the ex-Gaussian (ExGauss), the EZ model (EZ), the four-parameter diffusion model (Diff 4), and the seven-parameter diffusion model (Diff 7) – for (a) the congruent (top) and incongruent (bottom) stimuli of the interference paradigm and (b) the color (top) and form (bottom) task of the task-switching paradigm.
