Agent-Object Relationships in Level-2 Visual Perspective Taking: An Eye-Tracking Study
By: Ben Ford, Rebecca Monk, Damien Litchfield and Adam Qureshi
References
- Barr, D. J. (2013). Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 328. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328
- Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of memory and language, 68(3), 255–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Becchio, C., Bertone, C., & Castiello, U. (2008). How the gaze of others influences object processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(7), 254–258. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.005
- Blythe, H. I., Liversedge, S. P., Joseph, H. S., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2009). Visual information capture during fixations in reading for children and adults. Vision Research, 49(12), 1583–1591. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.015
- Boldry, J. G., Gaertner, L., & Quinn, J. (2007). Measuring the measures: A meta-analytic investigation of the measures of outgroup homogeneity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(2), 157–178. DOI: 10.1177/1368430207075153
- Brass, M., Schmitt, R. M., Spengler, S., & Gergely, G. (2007). Investigating action understanding: inferential processes versus action simulation. Current Biology, 17(24), 2117–2121. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.057
- Briscoe, R. (2009). Egocentric spatial representation in action and perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79(2), 423–460. DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00284.x
- Brüne, M. (2005). “Theory of mind” in schizophrenia: a review of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31(1), 21–42. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbi002
- Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind & Language, 28(5), 606–637. DOI: 10.1111/mila.12036
- Cane, J. E., Ferguson, H. J., & Apperly, I. A. (2017). Using perspective to resolve reference: The impact of cognitive load and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(4), 591–610. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000345
- Castiello, U. (2003). Understanding other people’s actions: intention and attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 416–430. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.416
- Chaigneau, S. E., Barsalou, L. W., & Zamani, M. (2009). Situational information contributes to object categorization and inference. Acta Psychologica, 130(1), 81–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.004
- Cole, G. G., Smith, D. T., & Atkinson, M. A. (2015). Mental state attribution and the gaze cueing effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(4), 1105–1115. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0780-6
- De Lillo, M., & Ferguson, H. J. (2023). Perspective-taking and social inferences in adolescents, young adults, and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/8z2tf
- Denkinger, B., & Kinn, M. (2018). Own-age bias and positivity effects in facial recognition. Experimental Aging Research, 44(5), 411–426. DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2018.1521493
- Dumontheil, I., Apperly, I. A., & Blakemore, S. J. (2010). Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science, 13(2), 331–338. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00888.x
- Estes, Z., Golonka, S., & Jones, L. L. (2011).
Thematic thinking: The apprehension and consequences of thematic relations . In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 249–294). Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00008-5 - Ferguson, H. J., Apperly, I., & Cane, J. E. (2017). Eye tracking reveals the cost of switching between self and other perspectives in a visual perspective-taking task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(8), 1646–1660. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1199716
- Ferguson, H. J., Brunsdon, V. E. A., & Bradford, E. E. F. (2018). Age of avatar modulates the altercentric bias in a visual perspective-taking task: ERP and behavioral evidence. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(6), 1298–1319. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-0641-1
- Flavell, J. H., Everett, B. A., Croft, K., & Flavell, E. R. (1981). Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence for the Level 1–Level 2 distinction. Developmental Psychology, 17, 99–103. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.17.1.99
- Foley, R. T., Whitwell, R. L., & Goodale, M. A. (2015). The two-visual-systems hypothesis and the perspectival features of visual experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 35, 225–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.005
- Ford, B., Monk, R., Litchfield, D. & Qureshi, A. (2023). Manipulating avatar age and gender in level-2 visual perspective taking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02249-7
- Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Research, 1079, 36–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.126
- Gong, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Q., Zhao, J., Zhao, N., Zou, M., …. & Wang, Y. (2021). The influence of cooperative action intention on object affordance: evidence from the perspective-taking ability of individuals. Psychological Research, 86, 1–12. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01523-4
- Hamilton, A. F. de C., Brindley, R., & Frith, U. (2009). Visual perspective taking impairment in children with autistic spectrum disorder. Cognition, 113(1), 37–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.007
- Henderson, J. M., Weeks Jr, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 210. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.1.210
- Hughes, C., & Leekam, S. (2004). What are the links between theory of mind and social relations? Review, reflections and new directions for studies of typical and atypical development. Social Development, 13(4), 590–619. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00285.x
- Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3(3),
e79 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079 - Janczyk, M. (2013). Level 2 perspective taking entails two processes: evidence from PRP experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1878. DOI: 10.1037/a0033336
- Kalénine, S., Mirman, D., Middleton, E. L., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2012). Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1274. DOI: 10.1037/a0027626
- Kawakami, K., Friesen, J., & Vingilis-Jaremko, L. (2018). Visual attention to members of own and other groups: Preferences, determinants, and consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(4),
e12380 . DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12380 - Kawakami, K., Williams, A., Sidhu, D., Choma, B. L., Rodriguez-Bailón, R., Cañadas, E., …. & Hugenberg, K. (2014). An eye for the I: Preferential attention to the eyes of ingroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(1), 1–20. DOI: 10.1037/a0036838
- Kessler, K., & Rutherford, H. (2010). The two forms of visuo-spatial perspective taking are differently embodied and subserve different spatial prepositions. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 213. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00213
- Kessler, K., & Thomson, L. A. (2010). The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference. Cognition, 114(1), 72–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.015
- Kessler, K., & Wang, H. (2012). Spatial perspective taking is an embodied process, but not for everyone in the same way: differences predicted by sex and social skills score. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 12(2–3), 133–158. DOI: 10.1080/13875868.2011.634533
- Kim, H. C., Jin, S., Jo, S., & Lee, J. H. (2020). A naturalistic viewing paradigm using 360 panoramic video clips and real-time field-of-view changes with eye-gaze tracking. NeuroImage, 216, 116617. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116617
- Klindt, D., Devaine, M., & Daunizeau, J. (2017). Does the way we read others’ mind change over the lifeitalic? Insights from a massive web poll of cognitive skills from childhood to late adulthood. Cortex, 86, 205–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.09.009
- Konovalova, E., & Le Mens, G. (2020). An information sampling explanation for the in-group heterogeneity effect. Psychological Review, 127(1), 47–93. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000160
- Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M. (2019). emmeans. R package version 1.8.8.
- Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94(4), 412–426. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.412
- Michelon, P., & Zacks, J. M. (2006). Two kinds of visual perspective taking. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(2), 327–337. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193680
- Molitor, R. J., Ko, P. C., Hussey, E. P., & Ally, B. A. (2014). Memory-related eye movements challenge behavioral measures of pattern completion and pattern separation. Hippocampus, 24(6), 666–672. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22256
- Monk, R. L., Colbert, L., Darker, G., Cowling, J., Jones, B., & Qureshi, A. W. (2020). Emotion and liking: How director emotional expression and knowledge of (dis)liking may impact adults’ ability to follow the instructions of an ignorant speaker. Psychological Research, 85, 2755–2768. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01441-x
- Morgan, E. J., Freeth, M., & Smith, D. T. (2018). Mental state attributions mediate the gaze cueing effect. Vision, 2(1), 11. DOI: 10.3390/vision2010011
- Morgan, E. J., Smith, D. T., & Freeth, M. (2021). Gaze cueing, mental States, and the effect of autistic traits. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1–9. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02368-0
- Nummenmaa, L., & Calder, A. J. (2009). Neural mechanisms of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(3), 135–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.006
- R Core Team (2013).
R: A language and environment for statistical computing . Austria, Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URLhttp://www.R-project.org/ - Richardson, H., & Saxe, R. (2020). Development of predictive responses in theory of mind brain regions. Developmental Science, 23(1),
e12863 . DOI: 10.1111/desc.12863 - Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1255–1266. DOI: 10.1037/a0018729
- Savitsky, K., Keysar, B., Epley, N., Carter, T., & Swanson, A. (2011). The closeness-communication bias: Increased egocentrism among friends versus strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 269–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.005
- Seymour, R. A., Wang, H., Rippon, G., & Kessler, K. (2018). Oscillatory networks of high-level mental alignment: a perspective-taking MEG study. NeuroImage, 177, 98–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.016
- Simpson, A. J., & Todd, A. R. (2017). Intergroup visual perspective-taking: Shared group membership impairs self-perspective inhibition but may facilitate perspective calculation. Cognition, 166, 371–381. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.003
- SR Research Experiment Builder 1.10.165 [Computer software]. (2011). Mississauga, Ontario, Canada: SR Research Ltd.
- Strickland-Hughes, C. M., Dillon, K. E., West, R. L., & Ebner, N. C. (2020). Own-age bias in face-name associations: Evidence from memory and visual attention in younger and older adults. Cognition, 200, 104253. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104253
- Surtees, A., Apperly, I., & Samson, D. (2013a). Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes. Cognition, 129(2), 426–438. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.008
- Surtees, A., Apperly, I., & Samson, D. (2013b). The use of embodied self-rotation for visual and spatial perspective-taking. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 698. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00698
- Teufel, C., Alexis, D. M., Clayton, N. S. and Davis, G. (2010a). Mental-state attribution drives rapid, reflexive gaze following. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), pp. 695–705. DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.3.695
- Teufel, C., Fletcher, P. C., & Davis, G. (2010b). Seeing other minds: attributed mental states influence perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(8), pp. 376–382. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.005
- Todd, A. R., Hanko, K., Galinsky, A. D., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). When focusing on differences leads to similar perspectives. Psychological Science, 22(1), 134–141. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610392929
- Tomasello, M. (2018). How children come to understand false beliefs: A shared intentionality account. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(34), 8491–8498. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1804761115
- Võ, M. L. H., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3), 24–24. DOI: 10.1167/9.3.24
- Wang, H., Callaghan, E., Gooding-Williams, G., McAllister, C., & Kessler, K. (2016). Rhythm makes the world go round: An MEG-TMS study on the role of right TPJ theta oscillations in embodied perspective taking. Cortex, 75, 68–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.11.011
- Ward, E., Ganis, G., McDonough, K. L., & Bach, P. (2020). Perspective taking as virtual navigation? Perceptual simulation of what others see reflects their location in space but not their gaze. Cognition, 199, 104241. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104241
- Wei, Y., Wan, Y., & Tanenhaus, M. (2020). Effects of Coordination on Perspective-taking: Evidence from Eye-tracking. In CogSci.
- Weiss, M. J., & Harris, S. L. (2001). Teaching social skills to people with autism. Behavior Modification, 25(5), 785–802. DOI: 10.1177/0145445501255007
- Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 2020–2045. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000014
- Wu, E. X. W., Laeng, B., & Magnussen, S. (2012). Through the eyes of the own-race bias: Eye-tracking and pupillometry during face recognition. Social Neuroscience, 7(2), 202–216. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2011.596946
- Wu, S., & Keysar, B. (2007). The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychological Science, 18(7), 600–606. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01946.x
- Xu, Y., Wang, X., Wang, X., Men, W., Gao, J. H., & Bi, Y. (2018). Doctor, teacher, and stethoscope: neural representation of different types of semantic relations. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(13), 3303–3317. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2562-17.2018
- Ye, T., Furumi, F., Catarino da Silva, D., & Hamilton, A. (2020). Taking the perspectives of many people: Humanization matters. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 888–897. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01850-4
- Young, A. H., & Hulleman, J. (2013). Eye movements reveal how task difficulty moulds visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 168–190. DOI: 10.1037/a0028679
- Unity Technologies. (2020). Unity (Version 2021.1.0) [computer software].
https://unity.com/releases/editor/archive
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.398 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 7, 2023
Accepted on: Aug 21, 2024
Published on: Oct 10, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2024 Ben Ford, Rebecca Monk, Damien Litchfield, Adam Qureshi, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.