Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Tulving’s (1989) Doctrine of Concordance Revisited Cover

Tulving’s (1989) Doctrine of Concordance Revisited

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. Abbott, E. E. (1909). On the analysis of the factor of recall in the learning process. The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements, 11(1), 159177. 10.1037/h0093018
  2. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219235. 10.1177/1088868309341564
  3. Aßfalg, A., Bernstein, D. M., & Hockley, W. (2017). The revelation effect: A meta-analytic test of hypotheses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 17181741. 10.3758/s13423-017-1227-6
  4. Baddeley, A. D., & Longman, D. J. (1978). The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics, 21(8), 627635. 10.1080/00140137808931764
  5. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 127(1), 5568. 10.1037//0096-3445.127.1.55
  6. Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulation fluctuation. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 3567). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  7. Brewer, W. F., & Sampaio, C. (2006). Processes leading to confidence and accuracy in sentence recognition. Memory, 14, 540552. 10.1080/09658210600590302
  8. Cleary, A. M. (2006). Relating familiarity-based recognition and the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Detecting a word’s recency in the absence of access to the word. Memory & Cognition, 34(4), 804816. 10.3758/BF03193428
  9. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(1), 3760. 10.3758/BF03210740
  10. Cleary, A. M. (2019). The biasing nature of the tip-of-the-tongue experience: When decisions bask in the glow of the tip-of-the-tongue state. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(7), 11781191. 10.1037/xge0000520
  11. Cleary, A. M., & Brown, A. S. (2021). The déjà vu experience (2nd ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429296116
  12. Cleary, A. M., Brown, A. S., Sawyer, B. D., Nomi, J. S., Ajoku, A. C., & Ryals, A. J. (2012). Familiarity from the configuration of objects in 3-dimensional space and its relation to déjà vu: A virtual reality investigation. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 969975. 10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.010
  13. Cleary, A. M., & Claxton, A. B. (2018). Déjà vu: An illusion of prediction. Psychological Science, 29(4), 635644. 10.1177/0956797617743018
  14. Cleary, A. M., Huebert, A. M., & McNeely-White, K. L. (2020). The tip- of-the-tongue state bias permeates unrelated concurrent decisions and behavior. Memory & Cognition, 48(4), 596606. 10.3758/s13421-019-00993-7
  15. Cleary, A. M., Huebert, A. M., McNeely-White, K. L., & Spahr, K. S. (2019). A postdictive bias associated with déjà vu. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 14331439. 10.3758/s13423-019-01578-w
  16. Cleary, A. M., Irving, Z. C., & Mills, C. (2023). What Flips Attention? Cognitive Science, 47(4), e13274. 10.1111/cogs.13274
  17. Cleary, A. M., McNeely-White, K. L., Huebert, A. M., & Claxton, A. B. (2021a). Déjà vu and the feeling of prediction: An association with familiarity strength. Memory, 29(7), 904920. 10.1080/09658211.2018.1503686
  18. Cleary, A. M., McNeely-White, K. L., Neisser, J., Drane, D. L., Liégeois-Chauvel, C., & Pedersen, N. P. (2025). Does familiarity-detection flip attention inward? The familiarity-flip-of-attention account of the primacy effect in memory for repetitions. Memory & Cognition, 114. 10.3758/s13421-024-01673-x
  19. Cleary, A. M., McNeely-White, K. L., Russell, S. A., Huebert, A. M., & Hausman, H. (2021b). The tip-of-the-tongue state as a form of access to information: Use of tip-of-the-tongue states for strategic adaptive test-taking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 10(1), 131142. 10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.08.013
  20. Cleary, A. M., & Rhodes, M. G. (2023). The science of learning initiative at Colorado State University. In C. E. Overson, C. M. Hakala, L. L. Kordonowy & V. A. Benassi (Eds.), In their own words: What scholars and teachers want you to know about why and how to apply the science of learning in your academic setting (pp. 190199). Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://teachpsych.org/ebooks/itow
  21. Cleary, A. M., & Robinson, D. H. (2025). Institutionalized Misinformation in US Education: Combatting the Overselling of Learning Styles and Underselling of Spaced Effort. Journal of Social Issues, 81(1), e70005. 10.1111/josi.70005
  22. Cleary, A. M., & Schwartz, B. L. (2025). Tip of the tongue States: Retrieval, Metacognition, and Experience. Cambridge University Press.
  23. Collier, A. K., & Beeman, M. E. (2012). Intuitive Tip of the Tongue Judgments Predict Subsequent Problem Solving One Day Later. Journal of Problem Solving, 4. 10.7771/1932-6246.1130
  24. Conte, N., Fairfield, B., Padulo, C., & Pelegrina, S. (2023). Metacognition in working memory: Confidence judgments during an n-back task. Consciousness and Cognition, 111, 103522. Epub 2023 Apr 21. PMID: 37087901. 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103522
  25. De Brigard, F. (2024). Episodic memory without autonoetic consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B379, 20230410. 10.1098/rstb.2023.0410
  26. Deepseek-AI. (2025). DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning. Company Report.
  27. Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79(1/2), 137. 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00123-2
  28. Dekker, H. D., & Kim, J. A. (2022). The widespread belief in learning styles. In D. H. Robinson, V. X. Yan, & J. A. Kim (Eds.), Learning styles, classroom instruction, and student achievement (pp. 1120). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 10.1007/978-3-030-90792-1_3
  29. Delay, C. G., & Wixted, J. T. (2021). Discrete-state vs. continuous models of the confidence-accuracy relationship in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 556564. 10.3758/s13423-020-01831-7
  30. Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(39), 1925119257. 10.1073/pnas.1821936116
  31. Dougal, S., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). Discovery misattribution: when solving is confused with remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 577592. 10.1037/0096–;3445.136.4.577
  32. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Sage.
  33. Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published in 1885).
  34. Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 120. 10.1080/00461520.2011.538645
  35. Fallow, K. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (2022). Subjective experiences of recognizing and not recognizing paintings and words. Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale, 76(3), 218225. 10.1037/cep0000291
  36. Fiechter, J. L., & Kornell, N. (2021). Answering a factual question today increases one’s confidence in the same answer tomorrow— independent of fluency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 962968. 10.3758/s13423-021-01882-4
  37. Fleck, J. I., & Weisberg, R. W. (2013). Insight versus analysis: evidence for diverse methods in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 436463. 10.1080/20445911.2013.779248
  38. Fleming, S. M. (2024). Metacognition and confidence: A review and synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology, 75(1). 10.1146/annurev-psych-022423-032425
  39. Frigo, L. C., Reas, D. L., & Lecompte, D. C. (1999). Revelation without presentation: Counterfeit study list yields robust revelation effect. Memory & Cognition, 27, 339343. 10.3758/BF03211417
  40. Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309313. 10.3758/BF03197041
  41. Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword judgments. Memory & Cognition, 18, 2330. 10.3758/BF03202642
  42. Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1993). Recognition memory and awareness: An experiential approach. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 337346. 10.1080/09541449308520122
  43. Geraci, L., McCabe, D. P., & Guillory, J. J. (2009). On interpreting the relationship between remember–know judgments and confidence: The role of instructions. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 701709. 10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.010
  44. Goldinger, S. D., & Hansen, W. A. (2005). Remembering by the Seat of Your Pants. Psychological Science, 16(7), 525529. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01569.x
  45. Gollan, T. H., & Brown, A. S. (2006). From tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) data to theoretical implications in two steps: When more TOTs means better retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 46283. 10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.462
  46. Greene, R. L. (2004). Recognition memory for pseudowords. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(3), 259267. 10.1016/j.jml.2003.12.001
  47. Greene, R. L. (2008). Repetition and spacing effects. In H. L. Roediger III. (Ed.), Cognitive Psychology of Memory. Vol. [2] of Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference (J. Byrne Editor), pp. [6578]. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-012370509-9.00168-6
  48. Greenspan, R. L., & Loftus, E. F. (2024). Interpreting eyewitness confidence: Numeric, verbal, and graded verbal scales. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 10.1002/acp.4151
  49. Grimmer, H. J., Tangen, J. M., Freydenzon, A., & Laukkonen, R. E. (2023). The illusion of insight: detailed warnings reduce but do not prevent false “Aha!” moments. Cognition and Emotion, 37, 329338. 10.31234/osf.io/shgfr
  50. Hartwig, M. K., Rohrer, D., & Dedrick, R. F. (2022). Scheduling math practice: Students’ underappreciation of spacing and interleaving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28(1), 100113. 10.1037/xap0000391
  51. Hintzman, D. L. (1974). Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium (pp. 7797). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
  52. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95(4), 528551. 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.528
  53. Huebert, A. M., McNeely-White, K. L., & Cleary, A. M. (2022). Can cue familiarity during recall failure prompt illusory recollective experience? Memory & Cognition, 50(4), 681695. 10.3758/s13421-021-01248-0
  54. Huebert, A. M., McNeely-White, K. L., & Cleary, A. M. (2023). On the relationship between tip-of-the-tongue states and partial recollective experience: Illusory partial recollective access during tip-of-the-tongue states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(2), 542570. 10.1037/xge0001292
  55. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(2), 126135. 10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.126
  56. Kang, S. H. (2017). The benefits of interleaved practice for learning. In J. Horvath, J. Lodge & J. Hattie (Eds.), From the Laboratory to the Classroom: Translating Science of Learning for Teachers (1st ed., pp. 7993). Routledge.
  57. Kapler, I. V., Weston, T., & Wiseheart, M. (2015). Spacing in a simulated undergraduate classroom: Long-term benefits for factual and higher-level learning. Learning and Instruction, 36, 3845. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.001
  58. Kirk-Johnson, A., Galla, B. M., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2019). Perceiving effort as poor learning: The misinterpreted-effort hypothesis of how experienced effort and perceived learning relate to study strategy choice. Cognitive Psychology, 115, 101237. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101237
  59. Kirwan, C. B., Shrager, Y., & Squire, L. R. (2009). Medial temporal lobe activity can distinguish between old and new stimuli independently of overt behavioral choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(34), 1461714621. 10.1073/pnas.0907624106
  60. Klein, S. B., & Nichols, S. (2012). Memory and the sense of personal identity. Mind, 121(483), 677702. 10.1093/mind/fzs080
  61. Knoll, A. R., Otani, H., Skeel, R. L., & Van Horn, K. R. (2017). Learning style, judgements of learning, and learning of verbal and visual information. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 544563. 10.1111/bjop.12214
  62. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100(4), 609639. 10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.609
  63. Koriat, A. (2012). The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review, 119, 80113. 10.1037/a0025648
  64. Koriat, A. (2024). Subjective confidence as a monitor of the replicability of the response. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10.1177/17456916231224387
  65. Kornell, N. (2009). Optimizing learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 12971317. 10.1002/acp.1537
  66. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the “enemy of induction”? Psychological Science, 19, 585592. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x
  67. Kornell, N., & Son, L. K. (2009). Learners’ choices and beliefs about self-testing. Memory, 17, 93501. 10.1080/09658210902832915
  68. Kostic, B., Booth, S. E., & Cleary, A. M. (2015). The role of analogy in reports of presque vu: Does reporting the presque vu state signal the near retrieval of a source analogy? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(6), 739754. 10.1080/20445911.2015.1031792
  69. Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 65(1), 7193. 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115154
  70. Lau, H., & Rosenthal, D. (2011). Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(8), 365373. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.009
  71. Lau, S., Hiemisch, A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2015). The experience of freedom in decisions – Questioning philosophical beliefs in favor of psychological determinants. Consciousness & Cognition, 33, 3046. 10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.008
  72. Dr. Laukkonen, R. E., Webb, M. E., Salvi, C., Tangen, J. M., Slagter, H. A., & Schooler, J. (2023). Insight and the selection of ideas. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105363
  73. Lindsay, D. S., & Kantner, J. (2011). A search for influences of feedback on recognition of music, poetry, and art. In P. A. Higham & J. P. Leboe (Eds.), Constructions of remembering and metacognition: Essays in honor of Bruce Whittlesea (pp. 137154). Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9780230305281_11
  74. Lindsay, D. S., Kantner, J., & Fallow, K. M. (2015). Recognition memory response bias is conservative for paintings and we don’t know why. In Remembering: Attributions, processes, and control in human memory: Essays in honor of Larry Jacoby (pp. 213229).
  75. McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63131). Elsevier.
  76. McNeely-White, K. L., & Cleary, A. M. (2019). Music recognition without identification and its relation to déjà entendu: A study using “Piano Puzzlers”. New Ideas in Psychology, 55, 5057. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.04.002
  77. McNeely-White, K. L., & Cleary, A. M. (2023). Piquing Curiosity: Déjà vu-Like States Are Associated with Feelings of Curiosity and Information-Seeking Behaviors. Journal of Intelligence, 11(6), 112. 10.3390/jintelligence11060112
  78. Metcalfe, J. (1993). Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model: Interpretations for Korsakoff amnesia. Psychological Review, 100, 322. 10.1037/0033-295X.100.1.3
  79. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Eich, T. S. (2020). Epistemic curiosity and the region of proximal learning. Current Opinion in Behavioral Science, 35, 4047. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.007
  80. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 851861. 10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.851
  81. Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238246. 10.3758/BF03197722
  82. Miller, J. K. (2010). Learning about frequency on the fly: Recent experience changes strategies regarding linguistic frequency in recognition memory. The Journal of general psychology, 137(2), 151174. 10.1080/00221301003645103
  83. Moraitou, D., & Efklides, A. (2009). The Blank in the Mind Questionnaire (BIMQ). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 115122. 10.1027/1015-5759.25.2.115
  84. Moulin, C. (2018). The cognitive neuropsychology of déjà vu. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315524931
  85. Mudros, L., Boly, M., Dehaene, S., Fleming, S. M., Lamme, V., Seth, A., & Melloni, L. (2025). Unpacking the complexities of consciousness: Theories and reflections. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 170. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106053
  86. Neisser, J., Abreu, G., Drane, D. L., Pedersen, N. P., Parsons, T. D., & Cleary, A. M. (2023). Opening a conceptual space for metamemory experience. New Ideas in Psychology, 69, 100995. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100995
  87. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125141). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
  88. Okada, N. S., McNeely-White, K. L., Cleary, A. M., Carlaw, B. N., Drane, D. L., Parsons, T. D., McMahan, T., Neisser, J., & Pedersen, N. P. (2024). A virtual reality paradigm with dynamic scene stimuli for use in memory research. Behavior Research Methods, 56(7), 64406463. 10.3758/s13428-023-02243-w
  89. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest, 9(3), 105119. 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
  90. Persuh, M. (2018). Measuring perceptual consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02320
  91. Peynircioğlu, Z. F., & Tekcan, A. İ. (1993). Revelation effect: Effort or priming does not create the sense of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 382388. 10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.382
  92. Popper, K. R., & Eccles, J. C. (1977). The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism. Berlin: Springer International. 10.1007/978-3-642-61891-8
  93. Pournaghdali, A., Schwartz, B. L., & Soto, F. A. (2025; in press). Tip-of-the-Tongue and Feeling-of-Knowing Experiences Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity of Confidence Evaluation of Semantic Memory. Journal of Cognition. 10.31234/osf.io/mbwu2
  94. Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89102. 10.3758/BF03211168
  95. Rhodes, M. G., Cleary, A. M., & DeLosh, E. L. (2020). A Guide to Effective Studying and Learning: Practical Strategies from the Science of Learning. Oxford University Press. New York, NY.
  96. Robinson, D. H., Yan, V. X., & Kim, J. A. (Eds.). (2022). Learning styles, classroom instruction, and student achievement. Springer.
  97. Roediger, H. L. 3rd, & Karpicke, J. D. (2018). Reflections on the Resurgence of Interest in the Testing Effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 236241. 10.1177/1745691617718873
  98. Roediger, H. L. III, & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 10431056.
  99. Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Stershic, S. (2015). Interleaved practice improves mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 900908. 10.1037/edu0000001
  100. Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 14321463. 10.1037/a0037559
  101. Ryals, A. J., & Cleary, A. M. (2012). The recognition without cued recall phenomenon: Support for a feature-matching theory over a partial recollection account. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 747762. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.002
  102. Ryals, A. J., Kelly, M. E., & Cleary, A. M. (2021). Increased pupil dilation during tip-of-the-tongue states. Consciousness and Cognition, 92, 103152. 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103152
  103. Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Wallas’ Four-Stage Model of the Creative Process: More Than Meets the Eye? Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 342352. 10.1080/10400419.2015.1087277
  104. Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Franconeri, S. L., Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2015). Sudden insight is associated with shutting out visual inputs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 18141819. 10.3758/s13423-015-0845-0
  105. Seabrook, R., Brown, G. D. A., & Solity, J. E. (2005). Distributed and Massed Practice: From Laboratory to Classroom. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 107122. 10.1002/acp.1066
  106. Schacter, D. L., Benoit, R. G., & Szpunar, K. K. (2017). Episodic future thinking: mechanisms and functions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 4150. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.06.002
  107. Schoeller, F., Jain, A., Pizzagalli, D. A., & Reggente, N. (2024). The neurobiology of aesthetic chills: How bodily sensations shape emotional experiences. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 24, 617630. 10.3758/s13415-024-01168-x
  108. Schwartz, B. L. (1999). Sparkling at the end of the tongue: The etiology and phenomenology of tip-of-the-tongue states. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 379393. 10.3758/BF03210827
  109. Schwartz, B. L. (2002). Tip-of-the-tongue states: Phenomenology, mechanism, and lexical retrieval. Lawrence Erlbaum: New Jersey. 10.4324/9781410604019
  110. Schwartz, B. L. (2024). Inferential theories of retrospective confidence. Metacognition and Learning, 19, 907938. 10.1007/s11409-024-09396-9
  111. Schwartz, B. L., & Cleary, A. M. (2016). Tip-of-the-tongue states, déjà vu experiences, and other odd metacognitive experiences. In J. Dunlosky & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metamemory (pp. 95108). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.5
  112. Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (2011). Tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states: Retrieval, Behavior, and Experience. Memory & Cognition, 39, 737749. 10.3758/s13421-010-0066-8
  113. Schwartz, B. L., & Pournaghdali, A. (2021). Tip-of-the-tongue-states: Past and Future. In A. Cleary & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Memory Quirks: The Study of Odd Phenomena in Memory (pp. 207223). Routledge Press. 10.4324/9780429264498-16
  114. Schwartz, B. L., & Smith, S. M. (1997). The retrieval of related information influences tip-of-the tongue states. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 6886. 10.1006/jmla.1996.2471
  115. Servais, A., Préa, N., Hurter, C., & Barbeau, E. J. (2023). Why and when do you look away when trying to remember? Gaze aversion as a marker of the attentional switch to the internal world during memory retrieval. Acta Psychologica, 240, 104041. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104041
  116. Shaw, J. S. III.. (1996). Increases in eyewitness confidence resulting from postevent questioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 126146. 10.1037/1076-898X.2.2.126
  117. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701703.
  118. Starns, J. J., & Ratcliff, R. (2008). Two dimensions are not better than one: STREAK and the univariate signal detection model of remember/know performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 169182. 10.1016/j.jml.2008.04.003
  119. Tekin, E., & Roediger, H. L. III.. (2017). The range of confidence scales does not affect the relationship between confidence and accuracy in recognition memory. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. PMID: 29285520; PMCID: PMC5736762. 10.1186/s41235-017-0086-z
  120. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). The architecture of intuition: fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen., 138(1), 3963. 10.1037/a0014678
  121. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
  122. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 112. 10.1037/h0080017
  123. Tulving, E. (1989). Memory: Performance, knowledge, and experience. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 326. 10.1080/09541448908403069
  124. Tulving, E. (1998). Personal communication, May 10, 1998.
  125. Umanath, S., & Coane, J. H. (2020). Face validity of remembering and knowing: Empirical consensus and disagreement between participants and researchers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 14001422. 10.1177/1745691620917672
  126. Umanath, S., Coane, J. H., Huff, M. J., Cimenian, T., & Chang, K. (2023). Ecological validity of don’t remember and don’t know for distinguishing accessibility-versus availability-based retrieval failures in older and younger adults: Knowledge for news events. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 8, 2. 10.1186/s41235-022-00458-7
  127. Umanath, S. Coane, J. H., Renaker, J. T., Whitman, K., Lee, A. A., & Kim, S. (2025). Using the phenomenology of knowledge-based retrieval failures in younger and older adults to characterize proximity to retrieval success and identify a Zone of Proximal Retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 140, 104582. 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104582
  128. Undorf, M., Söllner, A., & Bröder, A. (2018). Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition, 46, 507519. 10.3758/s13421-017-0780-6
  129. Valueva, E., Lapteva, E., & Ushakov, D. (2016). Aha-cueing in problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 204208. 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.003
  130. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. Harcourt, Brace and Company.
  131. Walter, J. (2021). Consciousness as a multidimensional phenomenon: implications for the assessment of disorders of consciousness. Neuroscience of Consciousness, niab047(2). 10.1093/nc/niab047
  132. Watkins, M. J., & Peynircioglu, Z. F. (1990). The revelation effect: When disguising test items induces recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(6), 10121020. 10.1037/0278-7393.16.6.1012
  133. Weisberg, R. W. (2013). On the “demystification” of insight: a critique of neuroimaging studies of insight. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 114. 10.1080/10400419.2013.752178
  134. Wiley, J., & Danek, A. H. (2024). Restructuring processes and Aha! experiences in insight problem solving. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3(1), 4255. 10.1038/s44159-023-00257-x
  135. Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266271. 10.1177/0098628315589505
  136. Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 152176. 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152
  137. Wixted, J. T., & Mickes, L. (2010). A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. Psychological Review, 117(4), 10251054. 10.1037/a0020874
  138. Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., Clark, S. E., Gronlund, S. D., & Roediger, H. L. III.. (2015). Initial eyewitness confidence reliably predicts eyewitness identification accuracy. American Psychologist, 70(6), 515526. 10.1037/a0039510
  139. Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between Eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A New Synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18, 1065. 10.1177/1529100616686966
  140. Yaniv, I., & Meyer, D. E. (1987). Activation and metacognition of in-accessible stored information: Potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 187205. 10.1037//0278-7393.13.2.187
  141. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441517. 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.447 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 6, 2025
Accepted on: May 6, 2025
Published on: May 23, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Bennett L. Schwartz, Anne M. Cleary, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.