Revisiting the Plausibility Effect in Remembering Truth and Falsity: An Analysis of Underlying Memory and Guessing Processes
By: Daria Ford and Lena Nadarevic
References
- Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(1), 57–86. 10.3758/BF03210812
- Bayen, U. J., & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2011). Influences of source–item contingency and schematic knowledge on source monitoring: Tests of the probability-matching account. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(1), 1–17. 10.1016/j.jml.2010.09.001
- Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 197–215. 10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.197
- Bayen, U. J., Nakamura, G. V., Dupuis, S. E., & Yang, C.-L. (2000). The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28(3), 480–500. 10.3758/BF03198562
- Bell, R., Buchner, A., & Musch, J. (2010). Enhanced old–new recognition and source memory for faces of cooperators and defectors in a social-dilemma game. Cognition, 117(3), 261–275. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.020
- Bröder, A., & Meiser, T. (2007). Measuring Source Memory. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215(1), 52–60. 10.1027/0044-3409.215.1.52
- de Bruïne, A., Vel Tromp, M., Koornneef, A., Brod, G., & Jolles, D. (2025). The interactive effects of surprise and plausibility on memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 51(6), 954–967. 10.1037/xlm0001388
- Erdfelder, E., Auer, T.-S., Hilbig, B. E., Aßfalg, A., Moshagen, M., & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial Processing Tree Models: A Review of the Literature. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217(3), 108–124. 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.108
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. 10.3758/BF03193146
- Fazio, L. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2009). Surprising feedback improves later memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 88–92. 10.3758/PBR.16.1.88
- Fazio, L. K., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2019). Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1705–1710. 10.3758/s13423-019-01651-4
- Ford, D., & Nieznański, M. (2023). Cognitive load reduces context recollection for true sentences. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 35(6–7), 663–676. 10.1080/20445911.2023.2245600
- Heck, D. W., Arnold, N. R., & Arnold, D. (2018). TreeBUGS: An R package for hierarchical multinomial-processing-tree modeling. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 264–284. 10.3758/s13428-017-0869-7
- Henninger, F., Shevchenko, Y., Mertens, U., Kieslich, P. J., & Hilbig, B. E. (2024). lab.js: A free, open, online experiment builder (Version v23.0.0-alpha4) [Computer software]. Zenodo. 10.5281/ZENODO.597045
- Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59(1), 21–47. 10.1007/BF02294263
- Keefe, R. S. E., Arnold, M. C., Bayen, U. J., McEvoy, J. P., & Wilson, W. H. (2002). Source-monitoring deficits for self-generated stimuli in schizophrenia: Multinomial modeling of data from three sources. Schizophrenia Research, 57(1), 51–67. 10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00306-1
- Klauer, K. C. (2010). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree model: A latent-trait approach. Psychometrika, 75(1), 70–98. 10.1007/S11336-009-9141-0
- Knapp, B. R., & Batchelder, W. H. (2004). Representing parametric order constraints in multi-trial applications of multinomial processing tree models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48(4), 215–229. 10.1016/j.jmp.2004.03.002
- Krawczyk, M. C., Fernández, R. S., Pedreira, M. E., & Boccia, M. M. (2017). Toward a better understanding on the role of prediction error on memory processes: From bench to clinic. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 142, 13–20. 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.12.011
- Kuhlmann, B. G., Erdfelder, E., & Moshagen, M. (2019). Testing interactions in multinomial processing tree models. Frontiers in Psychology, 10,
2364 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02364 - Lange, K., Kühn, S., & Filevich, E. (2015). “Just Another Tool for Online Studies” (JATOS): An easy solution for setup and management of web servers supporting online studies. PLOS ONE, 10(6),
e0130834 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0130834 - Mercier, H. (2017). How gullible are we? A review of the evidence from psychology and social science. Review of General Psychology, 21(2), 103–122. 10.1037/gpr0000111
- Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 42–54. 10.3758/BRM.42.1.42
- Murnane, K., & Bayen, U. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory & Cognition, 24(4), 417–428. 10.3758/BF03200931
- Nadarevic, L. (2025). Effects of statement type and study context on memory for truth and falsity. PsyArXiv. 10.31234/osf.io/9t8fb_v1
- Nadarevic, L., & Bell, R. (2024). Remembering the truth or falsity of advertising claims: A preregistered model-based test of three competing theoretical accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31(5), 2323–2331. 10.3758/s13423-024-02482-8
- Nadarevic, L., & Erdfelder, E. (2013). Spinoza’s error: Memory for truth and falsity. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 176–186. 10.3758/s13421-012-0251-z
- Nadarevic, L., & Erdfelder, E. (2019). More evidence against the Spinozan model: Cognitive load diminishes memory for “true” feedback. Memory & Cognition, 47(7), 1386–1400. 10.3758/s13421-019-00940-6
- Niedziałkowska, D., & Nieznański, M. (2021). Recollection of “true” feedback is better than “false” feedback independently of a priori beliefs: An investigation from the perspective of dual-recollection theory. Memory, 29(9), 1186–1196. 10.1080/09658211.2021.1973037
- R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [Computer software].
https://www.R-project.org/ - Richter, T. (2015). Validation and comprehension of text information: Two sides of the same coin. Discourse Processes, 52(5–6), 337–355. 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1025665
- Schmidt, O., Erdfelder, E., & Heck, D. W. (2025). How to develop, test, and extend multinomial processing tree models: A tutorial. Psychological Methods, 30(4), 720–743. 10.1037/met0000561
- Singer, M. (2013). Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 361–366. 10.1177/0963721413495236
- Singer, M. (2019). Challenges in processes of validation and comprehension. Discourse Processes, 56(5–6), 465–483. 10.1080/0163853X.2019.1598167
- Singmann, H., & Kellen, D. (2013). MPTinR: Analysis of multinomial processing tree models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 560–575. 10.3758/s13428-012-0259-0
- Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(1), 34–50. 10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.34
- Vorms, M., Harris, A. J. L., Topf, S., & Hahn, U. (2022). Plausibility matters: A challenge to Gilbert’s “Spinozan” account of belief formation. Cognition, 220,
104990 . 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104990 - Wiswede, D., Koranyi, N., Müller, F., Langner, O., & Rothermund, K. (2013). Validating the truth of propositions: Behavioral and ERP indicators of truth evaluation processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(6), 647–653. 10.1093/scan/nss042
- Wulff, L., Bell, R., Mieth, L., & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2021). Guess what? Different source-guessing strategies for old versus new information. Memory, 29(3), 416–426. 10.1080/09658211.2021.1900260
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.459 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 15, 2024
Accepted on: Aug 14, 2025
Published on: Sep 2, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
© 2025 Daria Ford, Lena Nadarevic, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.