Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Language Comprehension in Background Noise – Effects of Noise Type and Task Modality Cover

Language Comprehension in Background Noise – Effects of Noise Type and Task Modality

Open Access
|Jan 2026

References

  1. Aust, F., & Barth, M. (2022). papaja: Prepare Reproducible APA Journal Articles with R Markdown. R package version 0.1.3. 10.32614/CRAN.package.papaja
  2. Bradley, J. S., & Sato, H. (2008). The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(4), 20782086. 10.1121/1.2839285
  3. Brännström, K. J., Johansson, E., Vigertsson, D., Morris, D. J., Sahlén, B., & Lyberg-Åhlander, V. (2017). How children perceive the acoustic environment of their school. Noise & health, 19(87), 8494. 10.4103/nah.NAH_33_16
  4. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 3142. 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
  5. Carlie, J., Sahlén, B., Johansson, R., Andersson, K., Whitling, S., & Brännström, K. J. (2024). The effect of background noise, bilingualism, socioeconomic status, and cognitive functioning on primary school children’s narrative listening comprehension. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 67(3), 960973. 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00637
  6. Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278294. 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
  7. Diakidoy, I.-A. N., Stylianou, P., Karefillidou, C., & Papageorgiou, P. (2005). The relationship between listening and reading comprehension of different types of text at increasing grade levels. Reading Psychology, 26(1), 5580. 10.1080/02702710590910584
  8. Dockrell, J. E., & Shield, B. M. (2006). Acoustical barriers in classrooms: The impact of noise on performance in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 509525. 10.1080/01411920600635494
  9. Dragulescu, A., & Arendt, C. (2020). Xlsx: Read, Write, Format Excel 2007 and Excel 97/2000/XP/2003 files. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=xlsx.
  10. Elliott, E. M. (2002). The irrelevant-speech effect and children: Theoretical implications of developmental change. Memory & Cognition, 30(3), 478487. 10.3758/BF03194948
  11. Elliott, E. M., Hughes, R. W., Briganti, A., Joseph, T. N., Marsh, J. E., & Macken, B. (2016). Distraction in verbal short-term memory: Insights from developmental differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 88, 3950. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.008
  12. Fidêncio, V. L. D., Moret, A. L. M., & Jacob, R. T. D. S. (2014). Measuring noise in classrooms: A systematic review. CoDAS, 26(2), 155158. 10.1590/2317-1782/2014029in
  13. Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating Differences in General Comprehension Skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 430445. 10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.430
  14. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 610. 10.1177/074193258600700104
  15. Guerra, G., Tijms, J., Vaessen, A., Tierney, A., Dick, F., & Bonte, M. (2021). Loudness and intelligibility of irrelevant background speech differentiallyhinder children’s short story reading. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(1), 7787. 10.1111/mbe.12264
  16. Guerreiro, M. J. S., Murphy, D. R., & van Gerven, P. W. M. (2010). The role of sensory modality in age-related distraction: A critical review and a renewed view. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 9751022. 10.1037/a0020731
  17. Hughes, R. W. (2014). Auditory distraction: A duplex-mechanism account. PsyCh Journal, 3(1), 3041. 10.1002/pchj.44
  18. Hyönä, J., & Ekholm, M. (2016). Background speech effects on sentence processing during reading: An eye movement study. PLOS ONE, 11(3), e0152133. 10.1371/journal.pone.0152133
  19. Johnson, J. A., & Zatorre, R. J. (2005). Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: Behavioral and neural correlates. Cerebral Cortex, 15(10), 16091620. 10.1093/cercor/bhi039
  20. Joseph, T. N., Hughes, R. W., Sörqvist, P., & Marsh, J. E. (2018). Differences in auditory distraction between adults and children: A duplex-mechanism approach. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 112. 10.5334/joc.15
  21. Kassambara, A. (2020). ggpubr: ’Ggplot2’ based publication ready plots. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr
  22. Kassambara, A. (2021). rstatix: Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix
  23. Kim, Y.-S. (2015). Language and cognitive predictors of text comprehension: Evidence from multivariate analysis. Child Development, 86(1), 128144. 10.1111/cdev.12293
  24. Kintsch, W., & Mangalath, P. (2011). The construction of meaning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 346370. 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01107.x
  25. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363394. 10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
  26. Klatte, M., Bergström, K., & Lachmann, T. (2013). Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 578. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00578
  27. Klatte, M., Lachmann, T., & Meis, M. (2010a). Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise & Health, 12(49), 270282. 10.4103/1463-1741.70506
  28. Klatte, M., Lachmann, T., Schlittmeier, S., & Hellbrück, J. (2010b). The irrelevant sound effect in short-term memory: Is there developmental change? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(8), 11681191. 10.1080/09541440903378250
  29. Klatte, M., Meis, M., Sukowski, H., & Schick, A. (2007). Effects of irrelevant speech and traffic noise on speech perception and cognitive performance in elementary school children. Noise & Health, 9(36), 6474. 10.4103/1463-1741.36982
  30. Lakens, D., & Caldwell, A. (2021). Simulation-based power analysis for factorial analysis of variance designs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920951503. 10.1177/2515245920951503
  31. Leist, L., Breuer, C., Yadav, M., Fremerey, S., Fels, J., Raake, A., & Klatte, M. (2022). Differential effects of task-irrelevant monaural and binaural classroom scenarios on children’s and adults’ speech perception, listening comprehension, and visual–verbal short-term memory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15998. 10.3390/ijerph192315998
  32. Lundquist, P. (2003). Classroom noise: Exposure and subjective response among pupils (Doctoral dissertation, Umeå University).
  33. MacCutcheon, D., Pausch, F., Füllgrabe, C., Eccles, R., van der Linde, J., Panebianco, C., Fels, J., & Ljung, R. (2019). The contribution of individual differences in memory span and language ability to spatial release from masking in young children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(10), 37413751. 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-19-0012
  34. Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2008). Auditory distraction in semantic memory: A process-based approach. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 682700. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.002
  35. Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2009). Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction. Cognition, 110(1), 2338. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003
  36. Marsh, J. E., Ljung, R., Nöstl, A., Threadgold, E., & Campbell, T. A. (2015). Failing to get the gist of what’s being said: Background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 548. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00548
  37. Marsh, J. E., Vachon, F., Sörqvist, P., Marsja, E., Röer, J. P., Richardson, B. H., & Ljungberg, J. K. (2024). Irrelevant changing-state vibrotactile stimuli disrupt verbal serial recall: Implications for theories of interference in short-term memory. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 78100. 10.1080/20445911.2023.2198065
  38. McCreery, R. W., Spratford, M., Kirby, B., & Brennan, M. (2017). Individual differences in language and working memory affect children’s speech recognition in noise. International Journal of Audiology, 56(5), 306315. 10.1080/14992027.2016.1266703
  39. Meng, Z., Lan, Z., Yan, G., Marsh, J. E., & Liversedge, S. P. (2020). Task demands modulate the effects of speech on text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(10), 18921905. 10.1037/xlm0000861
  40. Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2022). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs (Version 0.9.12-4.4). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesFactor
  41. Murphy, D. R., Daneman, M., & Schneider, B. A. (2006). Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations? Psychology and Aging, 21(1), 4961. 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.49
  42. R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  43. Röer, J. P., Bell, R., Körner, U., & Buchner, A. (2018). Equivalent auditory distraction in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 172, 4158. 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.02.005
  44. Sala, E., & Rantala, L. (2016). Acoustics and activity noise in school classrooms in Finland. Applied Acoustics, 114, 252259. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.08.009
  45. Schwarz, H., Schlittmeier, S., Otto, A., Persike, M., Klatte, M., Imhof, M., & Meinhardt-Injac, B. (2015). Age differences in the irrelevant sound effect: A serial recognition paradigm. Psihologija, 48(1), 3543. 10.2298/PSI1501035S
  46. Seitz, J., & Fels, J. (2025). Activity-based acoustic situations in primary schools: Analyzing classroom noise and listening effort. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 157(3), 17721783. 10.1121/10.0036129
  47. Shield, B. M., & Dockrell, J. E. (2003). The effects of noise on children at school: A review. Building Acoustics, 10(2), 97116. 10.1260/135101003768965960
  48. Silbert, N. H., de Jong, K., Regier, K., Albin, A., & Hao, Y.-C. (2014). Acoustic properties of multi-talker babble. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(4), 2227. 10.1121/1.4877284
  49. Sjöberg, D. D., Curry, M., Hannum, M., Whiting, K., & Zabor, E. C. (2021). gtsummary: Presentation-ready data summary and analytic result tables. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gtsummary
  50. Sörqvist, P., Nöstl, A., & Halin, N. (2012). Disruption of writing processes by the semanticity of background speech. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(2), 97102. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00936.x
  51. Sullivan, J. R., Osman, H., & Schafer, E. C. (2015). The effect of noise on the relationship between auditory working memory and comprehension in school-age children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 10431051. 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0204
  52. Trauzettel-Klosinski, S., & Dietz, K. (2012). Standardized assessment of reading performance: The new international reading speed texts IReST. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 53(9), 54525461. 10.1167/iovs.11-8284
  53. Valente, D. L., Plevinsky, H. M., Franco, J. M., Heinrichs-Graham, E. C., & Lewis, D. E. (2012). Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(1), 232246. 10.1121/1.3662059
  54. Vasilev, M. R., Kirkby, J. A., & Angele, B. (2018). Auditory distraction during reading: A Bayesian meta-analysis of a continuing controversy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(5), 567597. 10.1177/1745691617747398
  55. Vasilev, M. R., Liversedge, S. P., Rowan, D., Kirkby, J. A., & Angele, B. (2019). Reading is disrupted by intelligible background speech: Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(11), 14841512. 10.1037/xhp0000680
  56. Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(1), 332. 10.1080/10888430709336632
  57. Wasiuk, P. A., Radvansky, G. A., Greene, R. L., & Calandruccio, L. (2021). Spoken narrative comprehension for young adult listeners: Effects of competing voices and noise. International Journal of Audiology, 60(9), 711722. 10.1080/14992027.2021.1878397
  58. Weissman, D. H., Warner, L. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2004). The neural mechanisms for minimizing cross-modal distraction. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(48), 1094110949. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3669-04.2004
  59. Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., D’Agostino McGowan, L., François, R., Grolemund, G., et al. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. 10.21105/joss.01686
  60. Xie, Y. (2014). Knitr: A comprehensive tool for reproducible research in R. In V. Stodden, F. Leisch, & R. D. Peng (Eds.), Implementing reproducible computational research. Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781466561595
  61. Zhu, H. (2021). kableExtra: Construct complex table with ‘kable’ and pipe syntax. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=kableExtra
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.478 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 14, 2022
Accepted on: Dec 8, 2025
Published on: Jan 7, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Michaela Socher, Isabella Ström, Josefine Andin, Åsa Elwér, Åsa Wengelin, Elisabeth Ingo, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.